Paper · 2016 · HortScience

Low Nitrogen Fertigation Promotes Root Development and Transplant Quality in Globe Artichoke

Daniel Leskovar; Yahia Othman

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effective nutrition and irrigation are important nursery strategies to produce high-quality seedlings able to withstand heat and drought stress in the field. The objectives of this study were 2-fold, first to identify the influence of two nitrogen (N) levels (75 and 150 mg·L −1 ) and two fertigation (FR) methods, overhead (OH) and flotation (FL) of artichoke ( Cynara cardunculus cv. Green Globe Improved) transplants on root/shoot growth and leaf physiology during the nursery period. A repeated greenhouse experiment was conducted and morphophysiological measurements were determined at 4 and 7 weeks after seeding (WAS). The second objective was to determine the impact of the nursery treatments (FR method and N level) on the subsequent crop growth and yield under three field irrigation methods [surface drip, subsurface drip, and overhead-linear system (OH-L)]. Field measurements were conducted at 50 and 150 days after field transplanting (DAT) during Fall–Winter 2015. Transplants fertilized with 75 mg·L −1 N (low N) had improved root components as compared to those with 150 mg·L −1 N (high N), especially at 4 WAS. The low N transplants had higher root surface area, root length, root branching, thinner root diameter, and less shoot area than the high N transplants. Wilting for low N transplants was 13.5% less than that for high N at 5 DAT, with a total yield similar or slightly higher than those of high N. Although growth of OH and FL transplants was statistically similar at transplanting, those irrigated with OH (greenhouse) had a 10% higher yield than FL irrigated transplants, regardless of the field irrigation method evaluated. Overall, low N level (75 mg·L −1 N) applied with OH irrigation in the nursery positively improved the transplant root system and transplant quality of artichoke seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplants fertilized with 75 mg·L −1 N had improved root components compared with 150 mg·L −1 N, especially at 4 WAS.

Material
Green Globe Improvede1
Organ / stage
Transplantse2
Treatment
75 mg·L −1 Ne2
Outcome
root componentse2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
especially at 4 WASe2
Comparator
150 mg·L −1 Ne2
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“A repeated greenhouse experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–534 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cynara cardunculus cv. Green Globe Improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–406 · show in text ↑
e2

“Transplants fertilized with 75 mg·L −1 N (low N) had improved root components as compared to those with 150 mg·L −1 N (high N), especially at 4 WAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N transplants had higher root surface area, root length and root branching than high N transplants.

Treatment
low Ne3
Outcome
root surface area, root length, root branchinge3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
high Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The low N transplants had higher root surface area, root length, root branching, thinner root diameter, and less shoot area than the high N transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N transplants had thinner root diameter than high N transplants.

Treatment
low Ne3
Outcome
root diametere3
Direction
thinnere3
Comparator
high Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The low N transplants had higher root surface area, root length, root branching, thinner root diameter, and less shoot area than the high N transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N transplants had less shoot area than high N transplants.

Treatment
low Ne3
Outcome
shoot areae3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
high Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The low N transplants had higher root surface area, root length, root branching, thinner root diameter, and less shoot area than the high N transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilting of low N transplants was 13.5% less than that of high N transplants at 5 DAT.

Treatment
low Ne4
Outcome
Wiltinge4
Direction
lesse4
Value
13.5%e4
Qualifier
at 5 DATe4
Comparator
high Ne4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“Wilting for low N transplants was 13.5% less than that for high N at 5 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield of low N transplants was similar to or slightly higher than that of high N transplants.

Treatment
low Ne4
Outcome
total yielde5
Direction
similar or slightly highere5
Comparator
high Ne5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“Wilting for low N transplants was 13.5% less than that for high N at 5 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1356 · show in text ↑
e5

“with a total yield similar or slightly higher than those of high N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplants irrigated with OH had a 10% higher yield than FL irrigated transplants, regardless of the field irrigation method.

Treatment
irrigated with OHe6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
10%e6
Qualifier
regardless of the field irrigation method evaluatede6
Comparator
FL irrigated transplantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e6

“those irrigated with OH (greenhouse) had a 10% higher yield than FL irrigated transplants, regardless of the field irrigation method evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of OH and FL transplants was statistically similar at transplanting.

Treatment
OHe7
Outcome
growthe7
Direction
statistically similare7
Qualifier
at transplantinge7
Comparator
FLe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“growth of OH and FL transplants was statistically similar at transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1509 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.