Paper · 2020 · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research

Performance of Some Pomegranate Cultivars under Different Irrigation levels inNorth Sinai

A Haleem; W Ghieth; A Hegazy; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought is one of the main serious problems for agriculture production which its intensity is increasing in many parts of the world. Hence, this experiment was carried out during 2015 and 2016 to study responses of four pomegranate cultivars Manfalouty, Nab-Elgamal, Wonderful and Wardi grown in sandy soil, in North Sinai Research Station, under different irrigation levels 100%, 75% and 50% of the recommended water level (11, 8.25 and 5.5m 3 /tree/year) on growth, flowering, yield and fruit quality. The results obtained that the highest irrigation level 100% (11 m 3 /tree /year) enhanced vegetative growth, fruit set (%), number of fruits/tree, yield/kg/tree and fruit quality (fruit weight, diameter, length,) followed by descending moderate irrigation level 75% (8.25 m 3 /tree /year) while, 50% (5.5 m 3 /tree/year) gave the lowest values during both seasons. One the other hand, the data showed that the percentage of total sugars, acidity and proline significantly increased by decreasing amount of water. Manfalouty cultivar gave the highest values of growth parameters, total flowers/tree, fruit set (%), no of fruits, yield, fruit weight aspects and sugar content, and the lowest fruit drop (%), fruit peel (%), peel thickness (cm) followed by descending order of Nab-Elgamal cultivar. While, Wonderful and Wardi cultivars exhibited the lowest significant values in both seasons respectively. Moreover, data indicated generally that the best treatment combination was gained from using irrigation level at 100% (11 m 3 /tree /year) with Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamal which exhibited the highest values for all vegetative growth parameters, fruit set (%), fruit weight aspects, fruit arils and the least sugar content. Whereas, the maximum flower/tree, number of fruits/tree, fruit retention (%) and yield was observed with Manfalouty under the same irrigation level. On the other hand, Wardi cultivar under least irrigation treatment at 50% (5.5 m 3 /tree/years) recorded the highest significant values of fruit drop (%), fruit peel (%), fruit thickness (cm), proline (%) and acidity (%). Generally, data clarified that Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamal pomegranate cultivars are considered as a highly tolerant and significant to drought stress under North Sinai conditions compared to Wonderful and Wardi cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation enhanced vegetative growth, fruit set, fruit number and yield relative to reduced irrigation.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100% (11 m 3 /tree /year)e0
Outcome
vegetative growth, fruit set (%), number of fruits/treee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
75% (8.25 m 3 /tree /year)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest irrigation level 100% (11 m 3 /tree /year) enhanced vegetative growth, fruit set (%), number of fruits/tree, yield/kg/tree and fruit quality (fruit weight, diameter, length,) followed by descending moderate irrigation level 75% (8.25 m 3 /tree /year) while, 50% (5.5 m 3 /tree/year) gave the lowest values during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation enhanced yield and fruit weight, diameter and length.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100% (11 m 3 /tree /year)e0
Outcome
yield/kg/tree and fruit quality (fruit weight, diameter, length,)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
75% (8.25 m 3 /tree /year)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest irrigation level 100% (11 m 3 /tree /year) enhanced vegetative growth, fruit set (%), number of fruits/tree, yield/kg/tree and fruit quality (fruit weight, diameter, length,) followed by descending moderate irrigation level 75% (8.25 m 3 /tree /year) while, 50% (5.5 m 3 /tree/year) gave the lowest values during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugars, acidity and proline rose as irrigation water declined.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
decreasing amount of watere0
Outcome
percentage of total sugars, acidity and prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of total sugars, acidity and proline significantly increased by decreasing amount of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manfalouty had the highest growth, flowering, fruit set, yield, fruit weight and sugar content.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Manfaloutye0
Outcome
growth parameters, total flowers/tree, fruit set (%)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manfalouty cultivar gave the highest values of growth parameters, total flowers/tree, fruit set (%), no of fruits, yield, fruit weight aspects and sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manfalouty had the lowest fruit drop, peel proportion and peel thickness.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Manfaloutye1
Outcome
fruit drop (%), fruit peel (%), peel thickness (cm)e0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest fruit drop (%), fruit peel (%), peel thickness (cm) followed by descending order of Nab-Elgamal cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“Manfalouty cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wonderful and Wardi had the lowest significant trait values in both seasons.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Wonderful and Wardie0
Outcome
lowest significant valuese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wonderful and Wardi cultivars exhibited the lowest significant values in both seasons respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation with Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamal gave the highest growth, fruit set, fruit weight and arils but least sugar.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamale0
Treatment
100% (11 m 3 /tree /year)e0
Outcome
vegetative growth parameters, fruit set (%), fruit weight aspectse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using irrigation level at 100% (11 m 3 /tree /year) with Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamal which exhibited the highest values for all vegetative growth parameters, fruit set (%), fruit weight aspects, fruit arils and the least sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manfalouty at full irrigation had maximum flowers, fruits, retention and yield.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Manfaloutye0
Treatment
same irrigation levele0
Outcome
flower/tree, number of fruits/tree, fruit retention (%)e0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum flower/tree, number of fruits/tree, fruit retention (%) and yield was observed with Manfalouty under the same irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wardi at 50% irrigation had the highest fruit drop, peel, proline and acidity values.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Wardie0
Treatment
50% (5.5 m 3 /tree/years)e0
Outcome
fruit drop (%), fruit peel (%), fruit thickness (cm)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wardi cultivar under least irrigation treatment at 50% (5.5 m 3 /tree/years) recorded the highest significant values of fruit drop (%), fruit peel (%), fruit thickness (cm), proline (%) and acidity (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamal were judged more drought tolerant than Wonderful and Wardi in North Sinai.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Material
Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamale0
Outcome
highly tolerant and significant to drought stresse0
Direction
highly tolerante0
Comparator
Wonderful and Wardi cultivarse0
Setting
North Sinaie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manfalouty and Nab-Elgamal pomegranate cultivars are considered as a highly tolerant and significant to drought stress under North Sinai conditions compared to Wonderful and Wardi cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2320 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.