Paper · 2022 · Land Degradation and Development

Impact of crop establishment and residue management on soil properties and productivity in rice‐fallow ecosystems in India

Rakesh Kumar; Janki Sharan Mishra; Sushanta Kumar Naik; et al.

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The degradation of agricultural land, both chemical and biological, is a big concern all over the world. Crop cultivation practices that are distinctive to each location have negative consequences for agricultural production. Therefore, there is an urgent need for better crop and soil management techniques. This experiment was conducted for 5 years (2016–2020) to identify the best crop establishment‐cum‐residue management (CERM) practices and suitable crops for succession after the rice harvest in rice‐fallow ecosystems of India. Experimentation was conducted in the split‐plot design and each treatment was replicated thrice, having CERM in main‐plot and post‐rainy season/winter crops in sub‐plot. All the CERM treatments had two variants, with crop residue (R+) and without crop residue (R−). Rice yields were markedly higher (19.1%–32.2%) in transplanted puddled rice with residue (TPR‐R+) over conventional‐till direct seeded rice (CTDSR) and zero‐till DSR (ZTDSR) treatments. However, TPR adversely impacted the performance of all the post‐rainy pulses/oilseed crops. Post‐rainy season crop yields under ZTDSR/CTDSR were 14.9%–45.8% higher leading to higher system productivity as compared to TPR. ZTDSR with residue retention showed higher soil aggregation. The practice of ZTDSR increased the soil dehydrogenase activity (46.2%), urease activity (29.8%), soil microbial biomass carbon (65.4), and fluorescein diacetate activity (9.0%) in the crop root zone with 3.3‐ and 4.47‐times higher earthworm population and earthworm biomass, respectively. The rice‐pulse system showed 1.74‐times more earthworm population over rice‐oilseed sequences. Total soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in ZTDSR was 21.8% higher over TPR in 0–45 cm soil profile. Thus, the adoption of ZTDSR practices and diversification of rice‐fallows with pulses crops is recommended for enhancing the crop productivity, increasing SOC stock, and improving soil biological properties in the rice‐fallow ecosystems of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted puddled rice with residue yielded 19.1%–32.2% more rice than conventional-till and zero-till direct seeded rice.

Treatment
transplanted puddled rice with residue (TPR‐R+)e0
Outcome
Rice yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.1%–32.2%e0
Comparator
conventional‐till direct seeded rice (CTDSR) and zero‐till DSR (ZTDSR) treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yields were markedly higher (19.1%–32.2%) in transplanted puddled rice with residue (TPR‐R+) over conventional‐till direct seeded rice (CTDSR) and zero‐till DSR (ZTDSR) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted puddled rice adversely affected post-rainy pulse and oilseed crop performance.

Taxon
pulses/oilseed cropse0
Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
adversely impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“TPR adversely impacted the performance of all the post‐rainy pulses/oilseed crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-rainy crops under zero-till or conventional-till direct seeded rice yielded 14.9%–45.8% more than under transplanted puddled rice.

Taxon
Post‐rainy season crope0
Treatment
ZTDSR/CTDSRe0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.9%–45.8%e0
Comparator
TPRe0

Verbatim

e0

“Post‐rainy season crop yields under ZTDSR/CTDSR were 14.9%–45.8% higher leading to higher system productivity as compared to TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till or conventional-till direct seeded rice led to higher system productivity than transplanted puddled rice.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
ZTDSR/CTDSRe0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
TPRe0

Verbatim

e0

“Post‐rainy season crop yields under ZTDSR/CTDSR were 14.9%–45.8% higher leading to higher system productivity as compared to TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice with residue retention had higher soil aggregation.

Treatment
ZTDSR with residue retentione0
Outcome
soil aggregatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZTDSR with residue retention showed higher soil aggregation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice increased soil dehydrogenase activity by 46.2%.

Treatment
ZTDSRe0
Outcome
soil dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
46.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The practice of ZTDSR increased the soil dehydrogenase activity (46.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice increased soil urease activity by 29.8%.

Treatment
ZTDSRe0
Outcome
urease activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZTDSR increased the soil dehydrogenase activity (46.2%), urease activity (29.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice increased soil microbial biomass carbon by 65.4.

Treatment
ZTDSRe0
Outcome
soil microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
65.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZTDSR increased the soil dehydrogenase activity (46.2%), urease activity (29.8%), soil microbial biomass carbon (65.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice increased fluorescein diacetate activity by 9.0%.

Treatment
ZTDSRe0
Outcome
fluorescein diacetate activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZTDSR increased the soil dehydrogenase activity (46.2%), urease activity (29.8%), soil microbial biomass carbon (65.4), and fluorescein diacetate activity (9.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice had 3.3-times higher earthworm population.

Treatment
ZTDSRe0
Outcome
earthworm populatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The practice of ZTDSR increased the soil dehydrogenase activity (46.2%), urease activity (29.8%), soil microbial biomass carbon (65.4), and fluorescein diacetate activity (9.0%) in the crop root zone with 3.3‐ and 4.47‐times higher earthworm population and earthworm biomass, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice had 4.47-times higher earthworm biomass.

Treatment
ZTDSRe0
Outcome
earthworm biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.47‐timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The practice of ZTDSR increased the soil dehydrogenase activity (46.2%), urease activity (29.8%), soil microbial biomass carbon (65.4), and fluorescein diacetate activity (9.0%) in the crop root zone with 3.3‐ and 4.47‐times higher earthworm population and earthworm biomass, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice-pulse sequences had 1.74-times more earthworms than rice-oilseed sequences.

Treatment
rice‐pulse systeme0
Outcome
earthworm populatione0
Direction
moree0
Value
1.74‐timese0
Comparator
rice‐oilseed sequencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice‐pulse system showed 1.74‐times more earthworm population over rice‐oilseed sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct seeded rice had 21.8% higher soil organic carbon stock than transplanted puddled rice.

Treatment
ZTDSRe0
Outcome
Total soil organic carbon (SOC) stocke0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.8%e0
Qualifier
0–45 cm soil profilee0
Comparator
TPRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in ZTDSR was 21.8% higher over TPR in 0–45 cm soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice‐fallow ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend zero-till direct seeded rice and rice-fallow diversification with pulses to improve productivity, soil carbon and soil biology.

Outcome
adoption of ZTDSR practices and diversification of rice‐fallows with pulses cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adoption of ZTDSR practices and diversification of rice‐fallows with pulses crops is recommended for enhancing the crop productivity, increasing SOC stock, and improving soil biological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1969 · show in text ↑

transplanting · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

transplanting · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

tillage · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

organic · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.