Paper · 2022 · Biology

Small-Sized Nanophosphorus Has a Positive Impact on the Performance of Fenugreek Plants under Soil-Water Deficit Stress: A Case Study under Field Conditions

Alaa I. B. Abou-Sreea; Marwa Kamal; Dalia M. El Sowfy; et al.

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is an essential macronutrient necessary for plant growth, development, and reproduction. Two field experiments were carried out in 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 on P-deficient soil to evaluate the impact of foliar fertilization with nanophosphorus (nP) on growth, yield, and physio-biochemical indices, as well as trigonelline content of fenugreek plants under deficient irrigation (dI) stress (a deficit of 20 and 40% of crop evapotranspiration; dI-20 and dI-40). The growth and yield traits, leaf integrity (relative water content and membrane stability index), photosynthetic pigment contents, leaf and seed P contents, and stem and leaf anatomical features significantly decreased under dI-20, with greater reductions recorded under dI-40. In contrast, water-use efficiency, osmoprotective compounds, including free amino acids, soluble sugars, proline, and trigonelline, along with antioxidant contents (ascorbate, glutathione, phenolics, and flavonoids) and their activity increased significantly under both dI-20 and dI-40. However, foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features. Besides, water-use efficiency, osmoprotectant contents, and antioxidant content and activity were further increased under both dI-20 and dI-40. The positive effects were more pronounced with the smaller nP (25 nm) than the larger nP (50 nm). The results of this study backed up the idea of using foliar nourishment with nP, which can be effective in modulating fenugreek plant growth and seed production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced growth and yield traits.

Treatment
dI-20e0
Outcome
growth and yield traitse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield traits, leaf integrity (relative water content and membrane stability index), photosynthetic pigment contents, leaf and seed P contents, and stem and leaf anatomical features significantly decreased under dI-20, with greater reductions recorded under dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced leaf integrity and photosynthetic pigment content.

Treatment
dI-20e0
Outcome
leaf integrity (relative water content and membrane stability index), photosynthetic pigment contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf integrity (relative water content and membrane stability index), photosynthetic pigment contents, leaf and seed P contents, and stem and leaf anatomical features significantly decreased under dI-20, with greater reductions recorded under dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced leaf and seed phosphorus content.

Treatment
dI-20e0
Outcome
leaf and seed P contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf and seed P contents, and stem and leaf anatomical features significantly decreased under dI-20, with greater reductions recorded under dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced stem and leaf anatomical features.

Treatment
dI-20e0
Outcome
stem and leaf anatomical featurese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem and leaf anatomical features significantly decreased under dI-20, with greater reductions recorded under dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both deficit irrigation treatments increased water-use efficiency.

Treatment
both dI-20 and dI-40e0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-use efficiency, osmoprotective compounds, including free amino acids, soluble sugars, proline, and trigonelline, along with antioxidant contents (ascorbate, glutathione, phenolics, and flavonoids) and their activity increased significantly under both dI-20 and dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both deficit irrigation treatments increased osmoprotective compounds.

Treatment
both dI-20 and dI-40e0
Outcome
osmoprotective compounds, including free amino acids, soluble sugars, proline, and trigonellinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“osmoprotective compounds, including free amino acids, soluble sugars, proline, and trigonelline, along with antioxidant contents (ascorbate, glutathione, phenolics, and flavonoids) and their activity increased significantly under both dI-20 and dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both deficit irrigation treatments increased antioxidant contents and activity.

Treatment
both dI-20 and dI-40e0
Outcome
antioxidant contents (ascorbate, glutathione, phenolics, and flavonoids) and their activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant contents (ascorbate, glutathione, phenolics, and flavonoids) and their activity increased significantly under both dI-20 and dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-P increased growth and yield traits.

Treatment
foliar feeding with nano-Pe0
Outcome
plant growth and yield traitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-P increased leaf integrity and pigment contents.

Treatment
foliar feeding with nano-Pe0
Outcome
leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-P increased leaf and seed phosphorus contents.

Treatment
foliar feeding with nano-Pe0
Outcome
leaf and seed P contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-P increased anatomical features.

Treatment
foliar feeding with nano-Pe0
Outcome
anatomical featurese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-P further increased water-use efficiency under both deficits.

Treatment
nano-Pe1
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
further increasede0
Qualifier
both dI-20 and dI-40e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-use efficiency, osmoprotectant contents, and antioxidant content and activity were further increased under both dI-20 and dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-P further increased osmoprotectant contents under both deficits.

Treatment
nano-Pe1
Outcome
osmoprotectant contentse0
Direction
further increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-use efficiency, osmoprotectant contents, and antioxidant content and activity were further increased under both dI-20 and dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-P further increased antioxidant content and activity under both deficits.

Treatment
nano-Pe1
Outcome
antioxidant content and activitye0
Direction
further increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-use efficiency, osmoprotectant contents, and antioxidant content and activity were further increased under both dI-20 and dI-40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar feeding with nano-P considerably increased plant growth and yield traits, leaf integrity, photosynthetic pigments contents, leaf and seed P contents, and anatomical features.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smaller 25 nm nano-P had more pronounced positive effects than 50 nm nano-P.

Treatment
smaller nP (25 nm)e0
Outcome
positive effectse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
larger nP (50 nm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The positive effects were more pronounced with the smaller nP (25 nm) than the larger nP (50 nm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors endorsed foliar nP for fenugreek growth and seed production.

Outcome
foliar nourishment with nPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using foliar nourishment with nP, which can be effective in modulating fenugreek plant growth and seed production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.