Paper · 2022 · Scientific Reports

Assessing the potential of native ecotypes of Poa pratensis L. for forage yield and phytochemical compositions under water deficit conditions

Nikwan Shariatipour; Bahram Heidari; Zahra Shams; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Evaluation of forage yield and antioxidant activity in Poa pratensis with high quality and good spring green-up forage might help variety improvement for use under water deficit condition. Germplasm and phenotypic diversity evaluations lay a foundation for genotype selection and improvement of varieties for drought tolerance in P. pratensis. The present study was conducted to assess the genetic potential of a collection of P. pratensis accessions for drought stress and to identify the association between polyphenol compounds and forage yield traits. Vegetative clone samples of 100 accessions collected from a diverse geographical area of Iran were clonally propagated in a greenhouse and evaluated in the field under two moisture regimes (non-stress and drought stress) in 2018 and 2019. Drought stress had negative effects on fresh and dry forage yields and reduced phenotypic variances. On average, drought stress reduced fresh and dry forage yields by 45% and 28%, respectively. The results of Mantel test showed no significant correlation between forage yield traits and geographical distances. Genetic coefficients of variation for forage yield and most of the phytochemicals were lower under drought stress, suggesting that deficit irrigation may reduce genetic variation for the tested traits. The estimates of heritability were higher under non-stress conditions than under drought stress treatment for forage yield traits and few polyphenols. However, the majority of polyphenol compounds had higher heritability than forage yield traits under drought stress, which suggests the potential for indirect selection. The 'Ciakhor', 'Damavand', 'Karvandan', 'Abrumand', and 'Abr2' accessions had high quantities for polyphenols and yield traits under both moisture regimes. These accessions are promising candidates for use in variety crossing programs and for developing high-yielding varieties under water-deficit conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced fresh forage yield by 45%.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
forage yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
45%e0
Qualifier
freshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress reduced fresh and dry forage yields by 45% and 28%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced dry forage yield by 28%.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
dry forage yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress reduced fresh and dry forage yields by 45% and 28%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced phenotypic variances.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
phenotypic variancese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress had negative effects on fresh and dry forage yields and reduced phenotypic variances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage yield traits did not correlate significantly with geographical distance.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Outcome
forage yield traitse0
Direction
no significant correlatione0
Setting
geographical distancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant correlation between forage yield traits and geographical distances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic coefficients of variation for forage yield and most phytochemicals were lower under drought.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Genetic coefficients of variation for forage yield and most of the phytochemicalse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic coefficients of variation for forage yield and most of the phytochemicals were lower under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heritability for forage yield traits and a few polyphenols was higher without stress.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought stress treatmente0
Outcome
estimates of heritabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“estimates of heritability were higher under non-stress conditions than under drought stress treatment for forage yield traits and few polyphenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most polyphenols had higher heritability than forage yield traits under drought.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
heritabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
forage yield traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“majority of polyphenol compounds had higher heritability than forage yield traits under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five named accessions had high polyphenol quantities and yield traits under both moisture regimes.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Material
'Ciakhor', 'Damavand', 'Karvandan', 'Abrumand', and 'Abr2'e0
Outcome
polyphenols and yield traitse0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
both moisture regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'Ciakhor', 'Damavand', 'Karvandan', 'Abrumand', and 'Abr2' accessions had high quantities for polyphenols and yield traits under both moisture regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The five named accessions were recommended as crossing candidates for drought adapted, high yielding varieties.

Taxon
Poa pratensisPoa pratensist0
Outcome
promising candidates for use in variety crossing programs and for developing high-yielding varieties under water-deficit conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These accessions are promising candidates for use in variety crossing programs and for developing high-yielding varieties under water-deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poa pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.