Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Genetic variation and response to selection of photosynthetic and forage characteristics in Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) ecotypes under drought conditions

Nikwan Shariatipour; Zahra Shams; Bahram Heidari; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.). Methods In the present study, 100 P . pratensis ecotypes collected from different geographical areas in Iran were assessed under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Genetic variation and response to selection for the photosynthetic characteristics [i.e., net photosynthesis rate (A), stomatal conductance ( g s ), transpiration rate (T r ), chlorophyll content (Chl), and photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm)] and forage yield [fresh forage yield (FY) and dry forage yield (Dy)] traits were analyzed during the 2018 and 2019 growing seasons. Results and discussion Drought stress had negative effects on evaluated photosynthesis parameters and significantly reduced dry and fresh forage yields. On average, FY with a 45% decrease and g s with a 326% decrease under drought stress conditions showed the highest reduction rate among forage yield and photosynthesis traits, respectively. Genotypic coefficients of variation (GCV) for FY were lower under drought stress. The estimates of heritability, genetic advance, and genetic advance as percentage of mean showed the predominance of additive gene action for the traits. Overall, the results showed that “Ciakhor”, “Damavand”, “Karvandan”, “Basmenj”, “Abr2”, “Abrumand”, “Borhan”, “Hezarkanian”, “LasemCheshmeh”, “Torshab”, and “DoSar” have higher forage yield production with little change between two irrigation regimes, which makes them promising candidates for developing high-yielding drought-tolerant varieties through breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress had negative effects on the evaluated photosynthesis parameters of Kentucky bluegrass ecotypes.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Material
ecotypese1
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
photosynthesis parameterse2
Direction
negative effectse2
Comparator
well-waterede1
Setting
Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 P . pratensis ecotypes collected from different geographical areas in Iran were assessed under well-watered and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–409 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought stress had negative effects on evaluated photosynthesis parameters and significantly reduced dry and fresh forage yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced dry and fresh forage yields of the ecotypes.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Material
ecotypese1
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
dry and fresh forage yieldse2
Direction
significantly reducede2
Comparator
well-waterede1
Setting
Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 P . pratensis ecotypes collected from different geographical areas in Iran were assessed under well-watered and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–409 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought stress had negative effects on evaluated photosynthesis parameters and significantly reduced dry and fresh forage yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, fresh forage yield (FY) decreased by 45% under drought stress, the highest reduction rate among forage yield and photosynthesis traits.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Material
ecotypese1
Treatment
drought stress conditionse3
Outcome
FYe3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
45%e3
Qualifier
highest reduction rate among forage yield and photosynthesis traitse3
Comparator
well-waterede1
Setting
Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 P . pratensis ecotypes collected from different geographical areas in Iran were assessed under well-watered and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–409 · show in text ↑
e3

“On average, FY with a 45% decrease and g s with a 326% decrease under drought stress conditions showed the highest reduction rate among forage yield and photosynthesis traits, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance (g s) showed a 326% decrease under drought stress.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Material
ecotypese1
Treatment
drought stress conditionse3
Outcome
g se3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
326%e3
Comparator
well-waterede1
Setting
Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 P . pratensis ecotypes collected from different geographical areas in Iran were assessed under well-watered and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–409 · show in text ↑
e3

“On average, FY with a 45% decrease and g s with a 326% decrease under drought stress conditions showed the highest reduction rate among forage yield and photosynthesis traits, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic coefficients of variation for FY were lower under drought stress.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Material
ecotypese1
Treatment
drought stresse4
Outcome
Genotypic coefficients of variation (GCV) for FYe4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
well-waterede1
Setting
Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 P . pratensis ecotypes collected from different geographical areas in Iran were assessed under well-watered and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–409 · show in text ↑
e4

“Genotypic coefficients of variation (GCV) for FY were lower under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heritability and genetic advance estimates showed a predominance of additive gene action for the traits.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Outcome
additive gene actione5
Qualifier
estimates of heritability, genetic advancee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e5

“The estimates of heritability, genetic advance, and genetic advance as percentage of mean showed the predominance of additive gene action for the traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven named ecotypes had higher forage yield production with little change between two irrigation regimes.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Material
“Ciakhor”, “Damavand”, “Karvandan”, “Basmenj”, “Abr2”, “Abrumand”, “Borhan”, “Hezarkanian”, “LasemCheshmeh”, “Torshab”, and “DoSar”e6
Outcome
forage yield productione6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
little change between two irrigation regimese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall, the results showed that “Ciakhor”, “Damavand”, “Karvandan”, “Basmenj”, “Abr2”, “Abrumand”, “Borhan”, “Hezarkanian”, “LasemCheshmeh”, “Torshab”, and “DoSar” have higher forage yield production with little change between two irrigation regimes, which makes them promising candidates for developing high-yielding drought-tolerant varieties through breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1734 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The named ecotypes are promising candidates for developing high-yielding drought-tolerant varieties through breeding programs.

Taxon
Poa pratensis L.Poa pratensise0
Outcome
developing high-yielding drought-tolerant varietiese6
Qualifier
through breeding programse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of the effects of water-limited conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics and forage yield is important for enhancing the forage productivity and drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–236 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall, the results showed that “Ciakhor”, “Damavand”, “Karvandan”, “Basmenj”, “Abr2”, “Abrumand”, “Borhan”, “Hezarkanian”, “LasemCheshmeh”, “Torshab”, and “DoSar” have higher forage yield production with little change between two irrigation regimes, which makes them promising candidates for developing high-yielding drought-tolerant varieties through breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1734 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · yield · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.