Abstract
The wheat crop is considered one of the main grain crops and one of the most important strategic crops in the Egyptian diet. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of irrigation rates on some wheat genotypes using data of a field experiment conducted in the Agricultural Research Station of Itay Al-Baroud, Beheira Governorate during 2016/2017-2017/2018 seasons. Three irrigation rates (2, 3 and 4 irrigations after planting) were applied to six wheat genotypes (Egypt 2, Gemmiza 11, Egypt 1, Shandaweal 1, strain 1, strain 2). By studying the statistical relationship between the area, in thousand feddans, and time factor, it was shown that the area significantly increased annually by 52.84 thousand feddans. Also, the productivity increased by 0.04 ardab/fed and this increase was not significant. meanwhile, the total production significantly increased annually by 1094.14 thousand ardb. This increase was due to the increase in the cultivated area. The results indicated that the increase in the farm price, productivity costs, total revenue, net revenue per feddan is estimated at 26.97 pound/fed, 240,48 pound/fed, 611.26 pound/fed, 370.79 pounds/fed, respectively. It was also found that the return of the invested pound is considered an economic gain for the farmer during the period (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017). The results revealed that the second irrigation treatment (3 irrigations after planting) achieved the highest feddan productivity, highest revenue, highest net return and highest value of the invested pound. Moreover, the wheat cultivar Egypt 1 gave the highest productivity, highest revenue, the highest net return and highest return of the invested pound in the first season, while strain 1 achieved the highest productivity, the highest revenue, the highest net return and the highest return of the invested pound in the second season.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat area increased annually by 52.84 thousand feddans.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- areae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 52.84 thousand feddanse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the area significantly increased annually by 52.84 thousand feddans.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat productivity increased nonsignificantly by 0.04 ardab/fed.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.04 ardab/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the productivity increased by 0.04 ardab/fed and this increase was not significant.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat production increased annually by 1094.14 thousand ardb.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- total productione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 1094.14 thousand ardbe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the total production significantly increased annually by 1094.14 thousand ardb.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Farm price increased by 26.97 pound/fed.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- farm pricee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 26.97 pound/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the increase in the farm price, productivity costs, total revenue, net revenue per feddan is estimated at 26.97 pound/fed, 240,48 pound/fed, 611.26 pound/fed, 370.79 pounds/fed, respectively.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Productivity costs increased by 240,48 pound/fed.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- productivity costse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 240,48 pound/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the increase in the farm price, productivity costs, total revenue, net revenue per feddan is estimated at 26.97 pound/fed, 240,48 pound/fed, 611.26 pound/fed, 370.79 pounds/fed, respectively.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Total revenue increased by 611.26 pound/fed.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- total revenuee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 611.26 pound/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the increase in the farm price, productivity costs, total revenue, net revenue per feddan is estimated at 26.97 pound/fed, 240,48 pound/fed, 611.26 pound/fed, 370.79 pounds/fed, respectively.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Net revenue increased by 370.79 pounds/fed.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- net revenue per feddane0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 370.79 pounds/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the increase in the farm price, productivity costs, total revenue, net revenue per feddan is estimated at 26.97 pound/fed, 240,48 pound/fed, 611.26 pound/fed, 370.79 pounds/fed, respectively.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
The return on invested pounds was an economic gain for farmers.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- economic gain for the farmere0
- Qualifier
- during the period (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the return of the invested pound is considered an economic gain for the farmer during the period (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017).”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Three irrigations after planting gave the highest productivity.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 3 irrigations after plantinge0
- Outcome
- feddan productivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the second irrigation treatment (3 irrigations after planting) achieved the highest feddan productivity, highest revenue, highest net return and highest value of the invested pound.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Three irrigations after planting gave the highest revenue.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 3 irrigations after plantinge0
- Outcome
- revenuee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the second irrigation treatment (3 irrigations after planting) achieved the highest feddan productivity, highest revenue, highest net return and highest value of the invested pound.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Three irrigations after planting gave the highest net return.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 3 irrigations after plantinge0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the second irrigation treatment (3 irrigations after planting) achieved the highest feddan productivity, highest revenue, highest net return and highest value of the invested pound.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Three irrigations after planting gave the highest invested-pound value.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 3 irrigations after plantinge0
- Outcome
- value of the invested pounde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the second irrigation treatment (3 irrigations after planting) achieved the highest feddan productivity, highest revenue, highest net return and highest value of the invested pound.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Egypt 1 had the highest productivity, revenue, net return and invested-pound return in the first season.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Egypt 1e0
- Outcome
- productivity, highest revenue, the highest net return and highest return of the invested pounde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- first seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the wheat cultivar Egypt 1 gave the highest productivity, highest revenue, the highest net return and highest return of the invested pound in the first season”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Strain 1 had the highest productivity, revenue, net return and invested-pound return in the second season.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- strain 1e0
- Outcome
- productivity, the highest revenue, the highest net return and the highest return of the invested pounde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- second seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“strain 1 achieved the highest productivity, the highest revenue, the highest net return and the highest return of the invested pound in the second season.”
t0“BREAD WHEAT”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.