Paper · 2017 · Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Evaluation of Irrigation Scheduling Program and Wheat Yield Response in Egyptian Sandy Soil Conditions

Abou El Enin MM

6
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were performed in EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governorate under the condition of sandy soil during 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 seasons, to study the impact of three amount of water irrigation 60, 70 and 90% from evapotranspiration rate (1216 m3) and three compost rates (2, 4 and 6 ton/fed.) on some growth, yield and its components of two wheat varieties (sakha 93 and Gemmeiza 9). In both of seasons, the treatments were arranged in split split design in three replicates. Results of the two seasons showed that, by increasing the water irrigation amount from 60 to 70 or 90% of the evapotranspiration (1216 m3) that led to gradually significant increases for (leaf area (cm2)/plant, dry weight (gm)/plant) and yield and yield components (No. spikes/ m2, weight of grains /spike, No of grains/spike, weight of 1000 grains, economic yield (kg/fed) and harvest index). Compost rates had significant impacts on previous characteristics, during the two experimental seasons. The best compost rate was (6 ton/fed) which gave the best results for these traits. As compared with the lowest rate of 2 ton/fed. Results revealed that, Gemmieza 9 wheat variety exiled sakha 93 wheat variety significantly for above mentioned measurements during the two seasons. As for the first and second order interactions between the tested factors, results in the two trial seasons showed that, most of the interactions had significant effects on that character. It wealthy mentions that significant interaction effect was found between water irrigation amount with compost rates and wheat varieties was found during the two seasons. The highest values for previous characters were obtained by sowing Gemmieza-9 with adding irrigation quantity of 90% from evapotranspiration and practicing 6 ton compost per Fadden.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation from 60% to 70% or 90% of evapotranspiration increased leaf area and dry weight per plant of wheat.

Treatment
water irrigation amounte1
Outcome
leaf area (cm2)/plant, dry weight (gm)/plante1
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
60e1
Setting
EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governoratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two field experiments were performed in EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governorate under the condition of sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“by increasing the water irrigation amount from 60 to 70 or 90% of the evapotranspiration (1216 m3) that led to gradually significant increases for (leaf area (cm2)/plant, dry weight (gm)/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation increased the yield components number of spikes, weight of grains per spike and number of grains per spike of wheat.

Treatment
water irrigation amounte1
Outcome
No. spikes/ m2, weight of grains /spike, No of grains/spikee2
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
60e1
Setting
EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governoratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two field experiments were performed in EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governorate under the condition of sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“by increasing the water irrigation amount from 60 to 70 or 90% of the evapotranspiration (1216 m3) that led to gradually significant increases for (leaf area (cm2)/plant, dry weight (gm)/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–726 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield and yield components (No. spikes/ m2, weight of grains /spike, No of grains/spike, weight of 1000 grains, economic yield (kg/fed) and harvest index)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation increased the weight of 1000 grains, economic yield and harvest index of wheat.

Treatment
water irrigation amounte1
Outcome
weight of 1000 grains, economic yield (kg/fed) and harvest indexe2
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
60e1
Setting
EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governoratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two field experiments were performed in EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governorate under the condition of sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“by increasing the water irrigation amount from 60 to 70 or 90% of the evapotranspiration (1216 m3) that led to gradually significant increases for (leaf area (cm2)/plant, dry weight (gm)/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–726 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield and yield components (No. spikes/ m2, weight of grains /spike, No of grains/spike, weight of 1000 grains, economic yield (kg/fed) and harvest index)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The best compost rate of 6 ton/fed gave the best results for these traits compared with the lowest rate of 2 ton/fed.

Treatment
compost ratee4
Outcome
results for these traitse4
Direction
beste4
Value
6 ton/fede4
Comparator
2 ton/fede4
Setting
EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governoratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two field experiments were performed in EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governorate under the condition of sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compost rates had significant impacts on previous characteristics, during the two experimental seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–989 · show in text ↑
e4

“The best compost rate was (6 ton/fed) which gave the best results for these traits. As compared with the lowest rate of 2 ton/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmeiza 9 wheat excelled sakha 93 significantly for the above mentioned measurements.

Material
Gemmieza 9e5
Outcome
above mentioned measurementse5
Direction
exilede5
Comparator
sakha 93e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results revealed that, Gemmieza 9 wheat variety exiled sakha 93 wheat variety significantly for above mentioned measurements during the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant interaction effect was found between water irrigation amount, compost rates and wheat varieties.

Outcome
interaction effect was found between water irrigation amount with compost rates and wheat varietiese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“It wealthy mentions that significant interaction effect was found between water irrigation amount with compost rates and wheat varieties was found during the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1629 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.