Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing irrigation from 60% to 70% or 90% of evapotranspiration increased leaf area and dry weight per plant of wheat.

A claim from Evaluation of Irrigation Scheduling Program and Wheat Yield Response in Egyptian Sandy Soil Conditions · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation from 60% to 70% or 90% of evapotranspiration increased leaf area and dry weight per plant of wheat.

Treatment
water irrigation amounte1
Outcome
leaf area (cm2)/plant, dry weight (gm)/plante1
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
60e1
Setting
EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governoratee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–68
e0

“Two field experiments were performed in EL-Busily region, EL-Behira governorate under the condition of sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113
e1

“by increasing the water irrigation amount from 60 to 70 or 90% of the evapotranspiration (1216 m3) that led to gradually significant increases for (leaf area (cm2)/plant, dry weight (gm)/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–726

Title

Evaluation of Irrigation Scheduling Program and Wheat Yield Response in Egyptian Sandy Soil Conditions

Abou El Enin MM Advances in Crop Science and Technology 2017. doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000263

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-d7a33093dd17990e481ef56d3a7fbce0912268b4bc1ea9654bd37bac825e0e57 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.