Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Three irrigations after planting gave the highest net return.

A claim from ECONOMIC EVALUATION FOR THE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION RATES ON SOME BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations after planting gave the highest net return.

Treatment
3 irrigations after plantinge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the second irrigation treatment (3 irrigations after planting) achieved the highest feddan productivity, highest revenue, highest net return and highest value of the invested pound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1599
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74

Title

ECONOMIC EVALUATION FOR THE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION RATES ON SOME BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES

Sahar Ibrahem; Wafaa Eid; Y. El-Gohary Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019. doi:10.21608/ejarc.2019.210770

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-b322321d99fa1ac0b6bf996b28bdc97c63ca4d4a6381fd5954eb44ca766bd21a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.