Abstract
In the variant without water treatment (control), the duration of the pea growing season was 77 days, spraying the crops with structured water extended the growing season by one day. The density of pea crops before harvesting in different variants was 695-936 pieces/m2. The densest was the sowing of peas on the option of watering with structured water, which was 19% more than in the control. The percentage of damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by disease was 4-7%. The most affected leaves were in the variant of spraying with ordinary water, which was 2% more than in the control. Irrigation of pea crops with structured water reduced the damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by diseases by 1%, compared with the control. No differences were found in other variants compared to the control. Damage of pea seeds by pests was 4-7% of beans. The highest percentage of bean damage was found in the variant of spraying with structured water, and the lowest - in the control and watering with structured water. Weediness of pea crops in different variants was 46-79 pieces/m2. Weeds were found more than in the control with watering options: structured water - by 39.5%, ordinary water - by 22%. In the other cases, the weeds did not differ from the control. The number of beans per pea plant ranged from 6.9 to 9.5 pieces. Most beans were observed in the variant of watering with structured water, which was 14.7% more than in the control. The number of grains in one pea was 5.3-6.2 pcs. The largest number of grains in beans was found in the options of spraying with structured water, watering with structured water, and watering with ordinary water, which was 8.1% more than in the control. The mass of a thousand pea seeds was 244-248 g. The largest mass of a thousand seeds was observed in the variant of watering with structured water, which was 1.2% more than in the control. The highest yield of pea grain was established on the variant of irrigation with structured water - 5.79 t/ha, which was 42.3% more than on the control and 22.3% more than on the variant of irrigation with ordinary water. Spraying with structured water provides a yield of 4.65 t/ha, which was 28.2% more than in the control and 28.8% more than when spraying with ordinary water, but 19.7% less than when watering with structured with water.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying structured water extended the pea growing season by one day from the untreated 77 days.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- spraying the crops with structured watere0
- Outcome
- growing seasone0
- Direction
- extendede0
- Value
- one daye0
- Comparator
- without water treatment (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the variant without water treatment (control), the duration of the pea growing season was 77 days, spraying the crops with structured water extended the growing season by one day”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea crop density before harvest ranged from 695 to 936 pieces/m2.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- density of pea crops before harvestinge0
- Value
- 695-936 pieces/m2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The density of pea crops before harvesting in different variants was 695-936 pieces/m2”
Claim · model-written summary
Watering with structured water increased pea stand density by 19% versus control.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- watering with structured watere0
- Outcome
- sowing of pease0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 19%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The densest was the sowing of peas on the option of watering with structured water, which was 19% more than in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea leaf disease damage ranged from 4 to 7%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by diseasee0
- Value
- 4-7%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage of damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by disease was 4-7%”
Claim · model-written summary
Structured-water irrigation reduced pea leaf disease damage by 1% versus control.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Irrigation of pea crops with structured watere0
- Outcome
- damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by diseasese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 1%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of pea crops with structured water reduced the damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by diseases by 1%, compared with the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Other water variants did not differ from control in leaf disease damage.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Treatment
- other variantse0
- Outcome
- damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by diseasese1
- Direction
- No differencese0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No differences were found in other variants compared to the control”
e1“damage to the leaf surface of pea plants by diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Pests damaged 4–7% of pea beans.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- Damage of pea seeds by pestse0
- Value
- 4-7% of beanse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Damage of pea seeds by pests was 4-7% of beans”
Claim · model-written summary
Structured-water spraying had the highest bean pest damage.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Treatment
- spraying with structured watere0
- Outcome
- percentage of bean damagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest percentage of bean damage was found in the variant of spraying with structured water, and the lowest - in the control and watering with structured water”
e1“Damage of pea seeds by pests”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed density in pea crops ranged from 46 to 79 pieces/m2.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- Weediness of pea cropse0
- Value
- 46-79 pieces/m2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weediness of pea crops in different variants was 46-79 pieces/m2”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea plants had 6.9–9.5 beans each.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- number of beans per pea plante0
- Value
- 6.9 to 9.5 piecese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of beans per pea plant ranged from 6.9 to 9.5 pieces”
Claim · model-written summary
Structured-water irrigation increased beans per pea plant by 14.7% versus control.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Treatment
- watering with structured watere0
- Outcome
- beanse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 14.7%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Most beans were observed in the variant of watering with structured water, which was 14.7% more than in the control”
e1“beans per pea plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Grains per pea bean ranged from 5.3 to 6.2.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- number of grains in one peae0
- Value
- 5.3-6.2 pcse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of grains in one pea was 5.3-6.2 pcs”
Claim · model-written summary
Thousand-seed mass ranged from 244 to 248 g and was 1.2% greater under structured-water irrigation.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- watering with structured watere0
- Outcome
- mass of a thousand seedse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 1.2%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mass of a thousand pea seeds was 244-248 g. The largest mass of a thousand seeds was observed in the variant of watering with structured water, which was 1.2% more than in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Structured-water irrigation produced 5.79 t/ha, 42.3% above control and 22.3% above ordinary-water irrigation.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- irrigation with structured watere0
- Outcome
- yield of pea graine0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 5.79 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 42.3% more than on the control and 22.3% more than on the variant of irrigation with ordinary watere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of pea grain was established on the variant of irrigation with structured water - 5.79 t/ha, which was 42.3% more than on the control and 22.3% more than on the variant of irrigation with ordinary water”
Claim · model-written summary
Structured-water spraying yielded 4.65 t/ha, 28.2% above control and 28.8% above ordinary-water spraying, but 19.7% below structured-water irrigation.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Treatment
- Spraying with structured watere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 4.65 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 28.2% more than in the control and 28.8% more than when spraying with ordinary water, but 19.7% less than when watering with structured with watere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying with structured water provides a yield of 4.65 t/ha, which was 28.2% more than in the control and 28.8% more than when spraying with ordinary water, but 19.7% less than when watering with structured with water”
e1“the pea growing season”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →application · pest · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
79 papers more in this group
See all 83 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.