Abstract
Intensification of agricultural production provides the development and introduction of new, progressive, and cost-effective practices, including plant growth regulators. The effect of various growth regulators on the productivity of fodder beet of the Eckendorf yellow variety type was studied in the conditions of the Central-Non-Chernozem region of the Russian Federation in an experimental field in the Kaluga branch of Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy in the period from 2019 to 2021. The studies found that the level of productivity of fodder beet under the action of various growth regulators relative to the control variant significantly increases during pre-sowing seed treatment on 5–10,9% and when using phytoregulators by vegetation on 4,8–11,5%. The most significant increase in productivity and the yield of absolutely dry substances of root crops were noted in an intensive version of the technology using growth regulators Biodux and Zircon. The yield range for three years with these regulators was in the range of 560–561 c/ha, the yield of ACB was 72,5–72,8 c/ha during seed etching, and 559–564 c/ha and the yield of ACB72,5–73,1 c/ha during foliar treatments. In general, the percentage increase in the content of absolutely dry matter of fodder beetroots relative to the control variant with the use of growth regulators was 0,24–0,25%, the increase in the yield of feed units for variants with pre-sowing use of growth regulators was 3–6,6 c/ha or 4,9–10,9%, with foliar application – 2,8–7 c/ha or 4,6–11,5%. Thus, the research work for 2019–2021 proved the effectiveness of modern growth regulators in the Non-Chernozem zone of the Russian Federation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Pre sowing growth regulator seed treatment increased fodder beet productivity by 5–10,9% versus control.
Verbatim
e0“the level of productivity of fodder beet under the action of various growth regulators relative to the control variant significantly increases during pre-sowing seed treatment on 5–10,9%”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar growth regulator use increased fodder beet productivity by 4,8–11,5% versus control.
Verbatim
e0“the level of productivity of fodder beet under the action of various growth regulators relative to the control variant significantly increases during pre-sowing seed treatment on 5–10,9% and when using phytoregulators by vegetation on 4,8–11,5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Biodux and Zircon in the intensive treatment produced the largest productivity increase.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The most significant increase in productivity and the yield of absolutely dry substances of root crops were noted in an intensive version of the technology using growth regulators Biodux and Zircon”
t0“FODDER BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Biodux and Zircon in the intensive treatment produced the largest increase in root crop dry substance yield.
- Taxon
- FODDER BEETt0
- Treatment
- Biodux and Zircone0
- Outcome
- yield of absolutely dry substances of root cropse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The most significant increase in productivity and the yield of absolutely dry substances of root crops were noted in an intensive version of the technology using growth regulators Biodux and Zircon”
t0“FODDER BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
With Biodux and Zircon seed treatment, fodder beet yield was 560–561 c/ha.
Verbatim
e0“The yield range for three years with these regulators was in the range of 560–561 c/ha, the yield of ACB was 72,5–72,8 c/ha during seed etching”
t0“FODDER BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
With regulator seed treatment, ACB yield was 72,5–72,8 c/ha.
Verbatim
e0“the yield of ACB was 72,5–72,8 c/ha during seed etching”
t0“FODDER BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
With foliar regulator treatment, fodder beet yield was 559–564 c/ha.
Verbatim
e0“559–564 c/ha and the yield of ACB72,5–73,1 c/ha during foliar treatments”
e1“The yield range for three years with these regulators was in the range of 560–561 c/ha”
t0“FODDER BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
With foliar regulator treatment, ACB yield was 72,5–73,1 c/ha.
Verbatim
e0“the yield of ACB72,5–73,1 c/ha during foliar treatments”
t0“FODDER BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators increased fodder beet root dry matter content by 0,24–0,25% versus control.
Verbatim
e0“the percentage increase in the content of absolutely dry matter of fodder beetroots relative to the control variant with the use of growth regulators was 0,24–0,25%”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre sowing growth regulators increased feed unit yield by 3–6,6 c/ha or 4,9–10,9%.
- Taxon
- FODDER BEETt0
- Treatment
- pre-sowing use of growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- yield of feed unitse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3–6,6 c/ha or 4,9–10,9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the increase in the yield of feed units for variants with pre-sowing use of growth regulators was 3–6,6 c/ha or 4,9–10,9%”
t0“FODDER BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar growth regulators increased feed unit yield by 2,8–7 c/ha or 4,6–11,5%.
- Taxon
- FODDER BEETt0
- Treatment
- foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- yield of feed unitse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2,8–7 c/ha or 4,6–11,5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the increase in the yield of feed units for variants with pre-sowing use of growth regulators was 3–6,6 c/ha or 4,9–10,9%, with foliar application – 2,8–7 c/ha or 4,6–11,5%”
t0“FODDER BEET”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →class · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.