Paper · 2022 · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B

Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects induced by associated commercial glyphosate and 2,4-D formulations using theAllium cepabioassay

Mariana Finkler; Gabriela Zimmermann Prado Rodrigues; Juliana Machado Kayser; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies assessing the toxicity of glyphosate and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid mixture are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the mixture of these herbicides using Allium cepa. Roots were exposed to glyphosate (1.56 and 11.66 mg mL−1), 2,4-D (0.28 and 17.5 mg mL−1) and mixture for 24 h, based on the average concentration applied in the field and the acute reference dose (ARfD) established in Brazil. Both isolated and associated herbicides induced a significative decrease in mitotic index (MI) (P < 0.0001) in all tested concentrations. Regarding the genotoxicity results, 2,4-D and the mixture showed, at concentrations applied in the field, a significative increase of chromosomal anomalies (CA) index compared to control (P < 0.0001) and glyphosate (P = 0.024 and P = 0.0002, respectively). All tested groups from the ARfD showed a significative difference compared to the control group (P < 0.0001), as well as glyphosate and 2,4-D isolated compared to the mixture (P = 0.0005 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The most observed CA were apoptotic bodies, giant cells, and nuclear erosions. We emphasize the need for further studies assessing the toxicity of these herbicides’ mixture due to the distinct effects caused in different organisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate significantly reduced the Allium mitotic index at all tested concentrations.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
glyphosatet0
Outcome
mitotic index (MI)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
all tested concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both isolated and associated herbicides induced a significative decrease in mitotic index (MI) (P < 0.0001) in all tested concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“glyphosate and 2,4-D formulations using theAllium cepabioassay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D significantly reduced the Allium mitotic index at all tested concentrations.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
2,4-Dt0
Outcome
mitotic index (MI)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
all tested concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both isolated and associated herbicides induced a significative decrease in mitotic index (MI) (P < 0.0001) in all tested concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“2,4-D formulations using theAllium cepabioassay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture significantly reduced the Allium mitotic index at all tested concentrations.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
mixturee1
Outcome
mitotic index (MI)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
all tested concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both isolated and associated herbicides induced a significative decrease in mitotic index (MI) (P < 0.0001) in all tested concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“Roots were exposed to glyphosate (1.56 and 11.66 mg mL−1), 2,4-D (0.28 and 17.5 mg mL−1) and mixture for 24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At field concentrations, 2,4-D increased chromosomal anomalies relative to control and glyphosate.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
chromosomal anomalies (CA) indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
concentrations applied in the fielde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D and the mixture showed, at concentrations applied in the field, a significative increase of chromosomal anomalies (CA) index compared to control (P < 0.0001) and glyphosate (P = 0.024 and P = 0.0002, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At field concentrations, the herbicide mixture increased chromosomal anomalies relative to control and glyphosate.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
chromosomal anomalies (CA) indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
concentrations applied in the fielde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D and the mixture showed, at concentrations applied in the field, a significative increase of chromosomal anomalies (CA) index compared to control (P < 0.0001) and glyphosate (P = 0.024 and P = 0.0002, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested acute-reference-dose groups differed significantly from controls in chromosomal anomalies.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
All tested groups from the ARfDe0
Outcome
chromosomal anomalies (CA) indexe1
Comparator
control groupe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tested groups from the ARfD showed a significative difference compared to the control group (P < 0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–955 · show in text ↑
e1

“chromosomal anomalies (CA) index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At the acute reference dose, isolated glyphosate differed significantly from the mixture.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
chromosomal anomalies (CA) indexe1
Comparator
mixturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate and 2,4-D isolated compared to the mixture (P = 0.0005 and P < 0.0001, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“chromosomal anomalies (CA) index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At the acute reference dose, isolated 2,4-D differed significantly from the mixture.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
chromosomal anomalies (CA) indexe1
Comparator
mixturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate and 2,4-D isolated compared to the mixture (P = 0.0005 and P < 0.0001, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“chromosomal anomalies (CA) index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apoptotic bodies, giant cells and nuclear erosions were the most observed chromosomal anomalies.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Outcome
apoptotic bodies, giant cells, and nuclear erosionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most observed CA were apoptotic bodies, giant cells, and nuclear erosions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · cytology · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glyphosate · cytology · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.