Paper · 2022 · AIP conference proceedings

Studying the possibility of using UV-C radiation to improve seedling qualities and increase the productivity of soft spring wheat

E. A. Sharlaeva; V. Yu. Chirkova; V. S. Bublik

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One of the factors of abiotic stress is ultraviolet radiation. Acting on the photosynthetic apparatus of the cell, radiation causes a change in the intensity of photosynthesis - the main physiological process that determines the growth, development and productivity of plants. Quantitative changes in the content of photosynthetic pigments and the intensity of growth processes are indirect indicators of plant resistance to the effects of various environmental factors. With the right treatment regimes, UV radiation can be used to improve the sowing quality of seeds and increase the productivity of grain crops. The article presents the results of studying the effects of small doses of UV-C radiation on laboratory germination, the content of chlorophylls a and b, carotenoids in soft spring wheat seedlings, as well as indicators of the amount of chlorophylls, the ratio of chlorophylls a / b, the ratio of the sum of chlorophylls and carotenoids. According to the results obtained, the effect of UV radiation in the studied time range (30-180 seconds) led to an increase in laboratory germination and an increase in the content of chlorophylls and carotenoids, no dependence on the change in pigment ratios on exposure time was revealed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV radiation for 30-180 seconds increased laboratory germination of soft spring wheat.

Taxon
soft spring wheate1
Treatment
UV radiatione0
Outcome
laboratory germinatione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
studied time range (30-180 seconds)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of UV radiation in the studied time range (30-180 seconds) led to an increase in laboratory germination and an increase in the content of chlorophylls and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“carotenoids in soft spring wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV radiation increased the content of chlorophylls and carotenoids in soft spring wheat seedlings.

Taxon
soft spring wheate1
Treatment
UV radiatione0
Outcome
content of chlorophylls and carotenoidse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of UV radiation in the studied time range (30-180 seconds) led to an increase in laboratory germination and an increase in the content of chlorophylls and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“carotenoids in soft spring wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–811 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigment ratios in soft spring wheat seedlings showed no dependence on UV exposure time.

Taxon
soft spring wheate1
Treatment
exposure timee2
Outcome
change in pigment ratiose2
Direction
no dependencee2

Verbatim

e1

“carotenoids in soft spring wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–811 · show in text ↑
e2

“no dependence on the change in pigment ratios on exposure time was revealed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1242 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 7 positive, 12 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

uv · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 19 positive, 26 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.