Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Enhanced UV-B and ozone reduced wheat chlorophyll, carotenoid and ascorbic acid contents.

A claim from Effects of Enhanced UV-B Radiation and Tropospheric Ozone on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Field Grown Wheat · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B and ozone reduced wheat chlorophyll, carotenoid and ascorbic acid contents.

Treatment
Enhanced UV-B radiation and O3e0
Outcome
chlorophyll, carotenoid and ascorbic acid contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced UV-B radiation and O3 reduced biomass, yield, photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll, carotenoid and ascorbic acid contents and catalase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–411
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127

Title

Effects of Enhanced UV-B Radiation and Tropospheric Ozone on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Field Grown Wheat

N.K. Ambasht; M. Agrawal Biologia Plantarum 2003. doi:10.1023/b:biop.0000041076.95209.c3

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e424cb483ba7fd5e42d9233ece28d35de6b3428f81feaf9aba1a38fc6c182589 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

uv · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 7 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

ozone · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

21 papers: 0 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.