Abstract
In 2018–2020 in the department of fruit-growing technology of RUE “Institute of Fruit-growing”, the effect of foliar application of preparations of different spectrum of action (growth regulator “Epinˮ, organomineral fertilizer “Megafolˮ and complex fertilizer “KompleMet COˮ) on the yield and commercial quality of apple-tree fruits of early ripening period species Mechta and Kovalenkovskoye on a semi-dwarf rootstock 54-118. As a result of the investigations, it was found that the use of complex preparations of various effects on average over three years of research did not lead to an increase in yield in both studied apple-tree species, however their using influenced the commercial quality of the resulting crop. The output of Mechta species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial species with foliar application of the growth regulator “Epinˮ was 97.0 %, with the application of organic mineral fertilizer “Megafolˮ – 97.5 %, with the application of complex fertilizer “KompleMet COˮ – 95.8 %, which is 2.1–3.8 % more than in the control. The output of Kovalenkovskoye species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial species with foliar application of the “KompleMet СOˮ complex fertilizer was 95.3 %, which is 1.6 % more than in the control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Complex preparations did not increase yield in either apple-tree species averaged over three years.
- Taxon
- apple-tree
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- complex preparations of various effectse1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- did not lead to an increasee1
- Qualifier
- on average over three years of researche1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the use of complex preparations of various effects on average over three years of research did not lead to an increase in yield in both studied apple-tree species, however their using influenced the commercial quality of the resulting crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Complex preparations influenced the commercial quality of the apple-tree crop; the direction is not stated.
- Taxon
- apple-treeMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- complex preparations of various effectse1
- Outcome
- commercial qualitye1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the use of complex preparations of various effects on average over three years of research did not lead to an increase in yield in both studied apple-tree species, however their using influenced the commercial quality of the resulting crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Mechta apple-tree first and second commercial class output was 97.0 % with the growth regulator Epin, 2.1–3.8 % more than control.
- Taxon
- apple-treeMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Mechtae1
- Treatment
- foliar application of the growth regulatore1
- Outcome
- output of Mechta species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial speciese1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 97.0 %e1
- Qualifier
- 2.1–3.8 %e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The output of Mechta species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial species with foliar application of the growth regulator “Epinˮ was 97.0 %, with the application of organic mineral fertilizer “Megafolˮ – 97.5 %, with the application of complex fertilizer “KompleMet COˮ – 95.8 %, which is 2.1–3.8 % more than in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Mechta apple-tree first and second commercial class output was 97.5 % with organic mineral fertilizer, 2.1–3.8 % more than control.
- Taxon
- apple-treeMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Mechtae1
- Treatment
- organic mineral fertilizere1
- Outcome
- output of Mechta species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial speciese1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 97.5 %e1
- Qualifier
- 2.1–3.8 %e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The output of Mechta species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial species with foliar application of the growth regulator “Epinˮ was 97.0 %, with the application of organic mineral fertilizer “Megafolˮ – 97.5 %, with the application of complex fertilizer “KompleMet COˮ – 95.8 %, which is 2.1–3.8 % more than in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Mechta apple-tree first and second commercial class output was 95.8 % with complex fertilizer, 2.1–3.8 % more than control.
- Taxon
- apple-treeMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Mechtae1
- Treatment
- complex fertilizere1
- Outcome
- output of Mechta species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial speciese1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 95.8 %e1
- Qualifier
- 2.1–3.8 %e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The output of Mechta species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial species with foliar application of the growth regulator “Epinˮ was 97.0 %, with the application of organic mineral fertilizer “Megafolˮ – 97.5 %, with the application of complex fertilizer “KompleMet COˮ – 95.8 %, which is 2.1–3.8 % more than in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Kovalenkovskoye apple-tree first and second commercial class output was 95.3 % with complex fertilizer, 1.6 % more than control.
- Taxon
- apple-treeMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Kovalenkovskoyee1
- Treatment
- complex fertilizere1
- Outcome
- output of Kovalenkovskoye species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial speciese1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 95.3 %e1
- Qualifier
- 1.6 %e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The output of Kovalenkovskoye species apple-tree fruits of the first and second commercial species with foliar application of the “KompleMet СOˮ complex fertilizer was 95.3 %, which is 1.6 % more than in the control”
The same questions in other papers
class · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
137 papers more in this group
See all 141 papers →fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
174 papers more in this group
See all 178 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.