Paper · 2020 · Indian Forester

Growth Behaviour and Phenology of some Teak Clones

T. R. Pradhan; N. Bhol; A. K. Parida; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study was carried out in a Teak plantation of31-32 years old inside the Silvicultural Research Station, Koshia in Angui district of Odisha during January 2013 to June 14 to assess the growth behaviour and phenology of selected teak clones. The trial consists of 15 plus trees ofPurunakote and Barbara provenances of Odisha. The clone ORPUB 18 exhibited maximum DBH (26.60 and 28.01 cm) and height (19.45 and 19.46 m) at 31 and 32 years age, respectively among the clones. The lowest DBH of 19.22 and 20.61 cm and height o f 15.23 and 15.31 m were found in clone ORPUB 13 in 31 and 32 years of age, respectively. The phenology of ORPUB21 was observed earlier as compared to other clones. The peak ieafshedding ofdifferent clones was noticed between 3rd week ofDecemberto last week of January. Between the month of April to Mayieafrenewai in different clones occurred. The peak flowering ofciones was observed in last week of July to 1st week ofSeptember. Time of peak fruiting and peak fruit fail occurred in 1st week ofSeptember to last week ofOctober and 3rd week of December to last week ofJanuary, respectively. The variations in the diameter and height growth were indicating that these parameters are under genetic control whereas duration of different phenoiogicai events is influenced by environmental factors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ORPUB 18 had maximum DBH at 31 and 32 years, 26.60 and 28.01 cm.

Taxon
Teakt0
Material
ORPUB 18e0
Outcome
DBHe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
26.60 and 28.01 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“The clone ORPUB 18 exhibited maximum DBH (26.60 and 28.01 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ORPUB 18 had maximum height at 31 and 32 years, 19.45 and 19.46 m.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
heighte0
Value
19.45 and 19.46 me0
Qualifier
31 and 32 years agee0

Verbatim

e0

“and height (19.45 and 19.46 m) at 31 and 32 years age, respectively among the clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ORPUB 13 had the lowest DBH at 31 and 32 years, 19.22 and 20.61 cm.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
DBHe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19.22 and 20.61 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest DBH of 19.22 and 20.61 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ORPUB 13 had the lowest height at 31 and 32 years, 15.23 and 15.31 m.

Taxon
Teakt0
Material
ORPUB 13e0
Outcome
heighte0
Value
15.23 and 15.31 me0

Verbatim

e0

“height o f 15.23 and 15.31 m were found in clone ORPUB 13 in 31 and 32 years of age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ORPUB21 had earlier phenology than other clones.

Taxon
Teakt0
Material
ORPUB21e0
Outcome
phenologye0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
other clonese0

Verbatim

e0

“The phenology of ORPUB21 was observed earlier as compared to other clones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak leaf shedding was between the third week of December and the last week of January.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
peak ieafsheddinge0
Value
3rd week ofDecemberto last week of Januarye0

Verbatim

e0

“The peak ieafshedding ofdifferent clones was noticed between 3rd week ofDecemberto last week of January.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf renewal occurred between April and May.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
Mayieafrenewaie0
Value
April to Maye0

Verbatim

e0

“Between the month of April to Mayieafrenewai in different clones occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak flowering occurred from late July to early September.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
peak floweringe0
Value
last week of July to 1st week ofSeptembere0

Verbatim

e0

“The peak flowering ofciones was observed in last week of July to 1st week ofSeptember.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak fruiting occurred from early September to late October.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
peak fruitinge0
Value
1st week ofSeptember to last week ofOctobere0

Verbatim

e0

“Time of peak fruiting and peak fruit fail occurred in 1st week ofSeptember to last week ofOctober and 3rd week of December to last week ofJanuary, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak fruit fall occurred from the third week of December to the last week of January.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
peak fruit faile0
Value
3rd week of December to last week ofJanuarye0

Verbatim

e0

“peak fruit fail occurred in 1st week ofSeptember to last week ofOctober and 3rd week of December to last week ofJanuary, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted diameter and height variation as indicating genetic control.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
diameter and height growthe0
Qualifier
under genetic controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The variations in the diameter and height growth were indicating that these parameters are under genetic control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed phenological duration to environmental factors.

Taxon
Teakt0
Outcome
duration of different phenoiogicai eventse0
Qualifier
environmental factorse0

Verbatim

e0

“duration of different phenoiogicai events is influenced by environmental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑