Paper · 2022 · Forest Science and Technology

Optimum plant density and harvest age for maximizing productivity and minimizing competition in a Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation in West Java, Indonesia

Enny Widyati; Sutiyono; Darwo; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To produce large volumes of biomass for implementing its green energy policy, the Government of Indonesia has issued a short rotation energy plantation program for a number of tree species including Calliandra calothyrsus (Meissn.). Optimum density and prompt harvesting are needed to maximise productivity, but information regarding both factors is insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the optimum growth spacing and ideal felling age to produce the largest volumes of biomass both economically and sustainably. Experiments were arranged on one hectare of land, which was divided into four plots with different plant spacing treatments (1 × 1.5 m; 1.5 × 1.5 m; 2 × 1.5 m; and 2 × 2 m). Growth and yield observations were carried out on plants aged 12, 18, and 24 months in each plot, with 30 sample trees left for growth observations and ten sample trees cut at each of the three ages after planting. This resulted in a total of 240 samples from the 2,710 trees planted. Trees were felled at 50 cm from the soil surface, and the resulting stools were left to regrow. A year after felling, resulting coppices, were observed and cut. Growth, productivity and calorific value were studied for both ‘primary’ and ‘coppiced’ wood. Study results demonstrate that competition between plants strongly determines the growth and productivity of ‘primary’ wood. The plot with the densest plant spacing had the lowest nutrient content for almost all soil nutrients. Higher plant density showed higher competition index values, and resulted in fewer and smaller diameter stems emerging from stools, and lower biomass productivity. Competition index values, which increased with plant age, can be used as an indicator for determining harvest timing. Productivity increased by up to 15% following development as a coppice plantation. Optimum wood productivity and greatest economy came from parent stands with plant spacing of 2 × 2 m, harvested at 18 months old and coppiced. This treatment yielded an average biomass/tree of primary wood 7.2 kg and coppice wood 8.22 kg, respectively, with lignin content of approximately 22%, and calorific value of around 18,807 kJ. These values match biomass energy requirements for feedstock for electricity generation. Harvesting at 24 months showed no significant increases in productivity, lignin content, or calorific value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition influenced primary wood growth and productivity.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Outcome
growth and productivity of ‘primary’ woode0
Qualifier
competition between plantse0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“competition between plants strongly determines the growth and productivity of ‘primary’ wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The densest spacing had the lowest content for almost all soil nutrients.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
densest plant spacinge0
Outcome
nutrient content for almost all soil nutrientse0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
plote0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plot with the densest plant spacing had the lowest nutrient content for almost all soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased competition index.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
Higher plant densitye0
Outcome
competition index valuese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant density showed higher competition index values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density produced fewer stems from stools.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
Higher plant densitye0
Outcome
stems emerging from stoolse0
Direction
fewere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant density showed higher competition index values, and resulted in fewer and smaller diameter stems emerging from stools, and lower biomass productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density produced smaller stem diameters.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
Higher plant densitye0
Outcome
diameter stems emerging from stoolse0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant density showed higher competition index values, and resulted in fewer and smaller diameter stems emerging from stools, and lower biomass productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density lowered biomass productivity.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
Higher plant densitye0
Outcome
biomass productivitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant density showed higher competition index values, and resulted in fewer and smaller diameter stems emerging from stools, and lower biomass productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition index rose with plant age.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Organ / stage
plant agee0
Outcome
Competition index valuese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition index values, which increased with plant age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coppice development increased productivity by up to 15%.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
development as a coppice plantatione0
Outcome
Productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Productivity increased by up to 15% following development as a coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 2 × 2 m and harvest at 18 months with coppicing gave optimum wood productivity and economy.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
plant spacing of 2 × 2 m, harvested at 18 months old and coppicede0
Outcome
wood productivity and greatest economye0
Direction
Optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum wood productivity and greatest economy came from parent stands with plant spacing of 2 × 2 m, harvested at 18 months old and coppiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–1970 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum treatment yielded 7.2 kg primary wood biomass per tree.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
biomass/tree of primary woode0
Value
7.2 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment yielded an average biomass/tree of primary wood 7.2 kg and coppice wood 8.22 kg, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum treatment yielded 8.22 kg coppice wood biomass per tree.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
coppice woode0
Value
8.22 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment yielded an average biomass/tree of primary wood 7.2 kg and coppice wood 8.22 kg, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced approximately 22% lignin content.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Outcome
lignin contente0
Value
approximately 22%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with lignin content of approximately 22%, and calorific value of around 18,807 kJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2082–2163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced calorific value around 18,807 kJ.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Outcome
calorific valuee0
Value
around 18,807 kJe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with lignin content of approximately 22%, and calorific value of around 18,807 kJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2082–2163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest at 24 months did not significantly increase productivity.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
Harvesting at 24 monthse0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
no significant increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting at 24 months showed no significant increases in productivity, lignin content, or calorific value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2254–2361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest at 24 months did not significantly increase lignin content.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
Harvesting at 24 monthse0
Outcome
lignin contente0
Direction
no significant increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting at 24 months showed no significant increases in productivity, lignin content, or calorific value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2254–2361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest at 24 months did not significantly increase calorific value.

Taxon
CalliandraCalliandrat0
Treatment
Harvesting at 24 monthse0
Outcome
calorific valuee0
Direction
no significant increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calliandra
Calliandra · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting at 24 months showed no significant increases in productivity, lignin content, or calorific value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2254–2361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–142 · show in text ↑