Abstract
Aluminium stress is one of the major problems of wheat production that significantly reduces the growth and development. Al toxicity can be recovered by exogenous application of different growth inducing nutrient elements. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the ameliaration effect of B under Al toxicity. Therefore, a petri dish and hydroponic culture experiment of wheat was conducted at Crop Physiology Laboratory, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during the period from January 2016 to February 2017 to investigate the effect of boron on amelioration of aluminium toxicity in germination and seedling stage. Both the experiments were designed in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. The experiments were comprised of four levels of boron and aluminium concentrations viz., 0 µM B + 0 µM Al (control), 0 µM Al + 40 µM B, 200 µM Al + 40 µM B and 0 µM B + 200 µM Al and five wheat varieties viz; BARI Gom-23, BARI Gom-24, BARI Gom-28, BARI Gom-27 and BARI Gom-30. Results indicated that germination percentage, radicle and plumule length, root and shoot length, leaf length, fresh and dry mass plant-1 were greater in 0 µM Al + 40 µM B treated plants than 0 µM B + 200 µM Al induced conditions. It indicates that wheat seedlings are susceptible to aluminium and boron can ameliorate aluminium toxicity. However, among the studied varieties, the reduction of dry mass under aluminium stress was minimum in BARI Gom-28 followed by BARI Gom-23 indicating BARI Gom-28 was more tolerant to aluminium stress than the other varieties. On the contrary, the varieties, BARI Gom-27 and BARI Gom-24 were more susceptible to aluminium stress. So it indicates that aluminium stress severely affects the growth and developments especially in the sensitive varieties and tolerant varieties have the self-ability to grow and develop even under aluminium stress condition. Progressive Agriculture 32 (2): 127-139, 2021
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Boron without aluminium yielded greater wheat germination percentage than aluminium without boron.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- 0 µM Al + 40 µM Be0
- Outcome
- germination percentagee0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- 0 µM B + 200 µM Ale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“germination percentage, radicle and plumule length, root and shoot length, leaf length, fresh and dry mass plant-1 were greater in 0 µM Al + 40 µM B treated plants than 0 µM B + 200 µM Al induced conditions.”
e1“experiment of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron without aluminium yielded greater radicle, plumule, root, shoot and leaf lengths than aluminium without boron.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- 0 µM Al + 40 µM Be0
- Outcome
- radicle and plumule length, root and shoot length, leaf lengthe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- 0 µM B + 200 µM Ale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“germination percentage, radicle and plumule length, root and shoot length, leaf length, fresh and dry mass plant-1 were greater in 0 µM Al + 40 µM B treated plants than 0 µM B + 200 µM Al induced conditions.”
e1“experiment of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron without aluminium yielded greater fresh and dry plant mass than aluminium without boron.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- 0 µM Al + 40 µM Be0
- Outcome
- fresh and dry mass plant-1e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- 0 µM B + 200 µM Ale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“germination percentage, radicle and plumule length, root and shoot length, leaf length, fresh and dry mass plant-1 were greater in 0 µM Al + 40 µM B treated plants than 0 µM B + 200 µM Al induced conditions.”
e1“experiment of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
BARI Gom-28 had the minimum dry-mass reduction under aluminium stress, followed by BARI Gom-23.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- BARI Gom-28e0
- Treatment
- aluminium stresse0
- Outcome
- reduction of dry masse0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Comparator
- BARI Gom-23e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the reduction of dry mass under aluminium stress was minimum in BARI Gom-28 followed by BARI Gom-23”
e1“wheat varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
BARI Gom-28 was more tolerant to aluminium stress than the other wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- BARI Gom-28e0
- Treatment
- aluminium stresse0
- Outcome
- tolerant to aluminium stresse0
- Direction
- more tolerante0
- Comparator
- other varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“BARI Gom-28 was more tolerant to aluminium stress than the other varieties”
e1“wheat varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
BARI Gom-27 and BARI Gom-24 were more susceptible to aluminium stress.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- BARI Gom-27 and BARI Gom-24e0
- Treatment
- aluminium stresse0
- Outcome
- susceptible to aluminium stresse0
- Direction
- more susceptiblee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the varieties, BARI Gom-27 and BARI Gom-24 were more susceptible to aluminium stress”
e1“wheat varieties”
The same questions in other papers
aluminium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.