Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2020 to evaluate the efficacy of various sources of nutrients on the growth, quality, yield and economics of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L). There were six nutrient management practices consisting of organic, inorganic and combined sources of nutrients, which were evaluated, in randomized block design with five replications. Among the practices, the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8), number of fruits per plant (11.6) and yield per hectare (25,794 kg). Whereas, the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1), net return (Rs. 183844 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.59). The quality parameters like ascorbic acid content, total soluble solids (TSS) and titrable acidity were also higher under the organic source of nutrients compared to only chemical or integrated nutrient sources. It can be concluded that the productivity of tomatoes were higher under state recommended nutrient management practice (FYM @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + RDF). However for getting highly profitable and quality tomato production, the organic package – 50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + application of Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water can be recommended.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
State recommended nutrient management gave plant height 88.7.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- state recommended nutrient management practicee0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- performed welle0
- Value
- 88.7e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7)”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
State recommended nutrient management gave 49.8 primary and secondary branches per plant.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- state recommended nutrient management practicee0
- Outcome
- number of primary and secondary branches per plante0
- Direction
- performed welle0
- Value
- 49.8e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8)”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
State recommended nutrient management gave 11.6 fruits per plant.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- state recommended nutrient management practicee0
- Outcome
- number of fruits per plante0
- Direction
- performed welle0
- Value
- 11.6e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8), number of fruits per plant (11.6)”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
State recommended nutrient management gave yield of 25,794 kg per hectare.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- state recommended nutrient management practicee0
- Outcome
- yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- performed welle0
- Value
- 25,794 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8), number of fruits per plant (11.6) and yield per hectare (25,794 kg)”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic management gave gross return of Rs. 299288 ha-1.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- organic nutrient managemente0
- Outcome
- gross returne0
- Direction
- performed welle0
- Value
- Rs. 299288 ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1)”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic management gave net return of Rs. 183844 ha-1.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- organic nutrient managemente0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- performed welle0
- Value
- Rs. 183844 ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1), net return (Rs. 183844 ha-1)”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic management gave benefit cost ratio of 2.59.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- organic nutrient managemente0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- performed welle0
- Value
- 2.59e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1), net return (Rs. 183844 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.59)”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic nutrient sources raised ascorbic acid content, soluble solids and acidity.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- organic source of nutrientse0
- Outcome
- ascorbic acid content, total soluble solids (TSS) and titrable aciditye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- only chemical or integrated nutrient sourcese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“ascorbic acid content, total soluble solids (TSS) and titrable acidity were also higher under the organic source of nutrients compared to only chemical or integrated nutrient sources”
t0“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend the organic package for profitable, high quality tomato production.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- organic packagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“for getting highly profitable and quality tomato production, the organic package – 50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + application of Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water can be recommended”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.