Paper · 2022 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Effect of Different Sources of Nutrients on Productivity, Profitability and Quality of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Manickam S; Suganthy M; Ganesh R

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2020 to evaluate the efficacy of various sources of nutrients on the growth, quality, yield and economics of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L). There were six nutrient management practices consisting of organic, inorganic and combined sources of nutrients, which were evaluated, in randomized block design with five replications. Among the practices, the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8), number of fruits per plant (11.6) and yield per hectare (25,794 kg). Whereas, the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1), net return (Rs. 183844 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.59). The quality parameters like ascorbic acid content, total soluble solids (TSS) and titrable acidity were also higher under the organic source of nutrients compared to only chemical or integrated nutrient sources. It can be concluded that the productivity of tomatoes were higher under state recommended nutrient management practice (FYM @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + RDF). However for getting highly profitable and quality tomato production, the organic package – 50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + application of Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water can be recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

State recommended nutrient management gave plant height 88.7.

Treatment
state recommended nutrient management practicee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
performed welle0
Value
88.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

State recommended nutrient management gave 49.8 primary and secondary branches per plant.

Treatment
state recommended nutrient management practicee0
Outcome
number of primary and secondary branches per plante0
Direction
performed welle0
Value
49.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

State recommended nutrient management gave 11.6 fruits per plant.

Treatment
state recommended nutrient management practicee0
Outcome
number of fruits per plante0
Direction
performed welle0
Value
11.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8), number of fruits per plant (11.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

State recommended nutrient management gave yield of 25,794 kg per hectare.

Treatment
state recommended nutrient management practicee0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
performed welle0
Value
25,794 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the state recommended nutrient management practice (Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 25 t ha-1 + Azophos @ 2 kg ha-1 + Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)) performed well with respect to plant height (88.7), number of primary and secondary branches per plant (49.8), number of fruits per plant (11.6) and yield per hectare (25,794 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic management gave gross return of Rs. 299288 ha-1.

Treatment
organic nutrient managemente0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
performed welle0
Value
Rs. 299288 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic management gave net return of Rs. 183844 ha-1.

Treatment
organic nutrient managemente0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
performed welle0
Value
Rs. 183844 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1), net return (Rs. 183844 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic management gave benefit cost ratio of 2.59.

Treatment
organic nutrient managemente0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
performed welle0
Value
2.59e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the organic nutrient management (50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water) performed well with respect to gross return (Rs. 299288 ha-1), net return (Rs. 183844 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.59)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient sources raised ascorbic acid content, soluble solids and acidity.

Treatment
organic source of nutrientse0
Outcome
ascorbic acid content, total soluble solids (TSS) and titrable aciditye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
only chemical or integrated nutrient sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid content, total soluble solids (TSS) and titrable acidity were also higher under the organic source of nutrients compared to only chemical or integrated nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend the organic package for profitable, high quality tomato production.

Outcome
organic packagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for getting highly profitable and quality tomato production, the organic package – 50 % N requirement through organic manures (50 % FYM + 50 % Vermicompost) + seedling treatment with Beejamrit + application of Ghanajeevamrit @ 250 kg ha-1, Jeevamrit @ 500 litres ha-1 time-1 twice a month with irrigation water can be recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1863 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.