Abstract
The experiment was conducted during the cropping season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 at Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Dapoli, Maharashtra on 35 years old uniform mango (cv. Alphonso) trees with an objective study the effect of nutrients, irrigation and plant growth regulators on induction of post-harvest vegetative flush in mango. In the investigation the physiological behaviour of the mango trees were assessed in relation to influence of nutrients, plant growth regulator sprays and irrigation. Treatments differed significantly for rate of photosynthesis at all stages. Among the treatments the treatment foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10) recorded highest rate of photosynthesis at bud break stage than control. Treatments differed significantly for rate of transpiration at all stages. The rate of transpiration increased from before bud break stage to flower initiation stage. Among the treatments, foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10) recorded lowest rate of transpiration at before bud break stage. The highest rate was recorded by control. The rate of stomatal conductance decreased from before bud break stage to flower initiation stage in all the treatments and differ significantly. Among the treatments foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10) recorded highest rate of stomatal conductance followed by foliar application of GA 100 ppm with irrigation (T11) at before bud break stage. The lowest rate was recorded by control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments significantly differed in photosynthesis at all stages.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae1 - Outcome
- rate of photosynthesise0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Treatments differed significantly for rate of photosynthesis at all stages.”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% with irrigation had the highest photosynthesis at bud break versus control.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Material
- cv. Alphonsoe1
- Organ / stage
- bud break stagee0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10)e0
- Outcome
- rate of photosynthesise0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10) recorded highest rate of photosynthesis at bud break stage than control”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments significantly differed in transpiration at all stages.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Outcome
- rate of transpiratione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatments differed significantly for rate of transpiration at all stages.”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Transpiration increased from before bud break to flower initiation.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Organ / stage
- flower initiation stagee0
- Outcome
- rate of transpiratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- before bud break stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rate of transpiration increased from before bud break stage to flower initiation stage.”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% with irrigation had the lowest transpiration before bud break.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Organ / stage
- before bud break stagee0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10)e0
- Outcome
- rate of transpiratione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10) recorded lowest rate of transpiration at before bud break stage. The highest rate was recorded by control.”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Stomatal conductance fell from before bud break to flower initiation in all treatments.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Organ / stage
- flower initiation stagee0
- Outcome
- rate of stomatal conductancee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- before bud break stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rate of stomatal conductance decreased from before bud break stage to flower initiation stage in all the treatments and differ significantly.”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% with irrigation had highest stomatal conductance before bud break versus control.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Organ / stage
- before bud break stagee0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10)e0
- Outcome
- rate of stomatal conductancee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of 19:19:19 (Foliar grade) 2% with irrigation (T10) recorded highest rate of stomatal conductance followed by foliar application of GA 100 ppm with irrigation (T11) at before bud break stage. The lowest rate was recorded by control.”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar GA at 100 ppm with irrigation ranked second for stomatal conductance before bud break.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Organ / stage
- before bud break stagee0
- Treatment
- foliar application of GA 100 ppm with irrigation (T11)e0
- Outcome
- rate of stomatal conductancee0
- Direction
- followed bye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest rate of stomatal conductance followed by foliar application of GA 100 ppm with irrigation (T11) at before bud break stage”
e1“mango (cv. Alphonso) trees”
The same questions in other papers
application · physiology: photosynthesis · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.