Paper · 2022 · Journal of Food Quality

Quality Improvement in Vegetable Greenhouse by Cadmium Pollution Remediation

Zhihui Yu; Jie Tang

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Greenhouse vegetable production (GVP) has grown in importance as a source of public vegetable consumption as well as income for farmers. Due to the high cropping index, substantial agricultural input, and confined environment, numerous contaminants can accumulate in GVP. Polluted soil is treated with metal cadmium pollution remediation technology in order to improve the quality of vegetable greenhouse soil and increase crop yields. The heavy metal cadmium-contaminated soil in vegetable greenhouses is rectified utilizing three methods: chemical remediation, bioremediation, and physical remediation. Soil restoration with broom sedge planting might result in a 9.78 percent reduction in cadmium pollution. Planting broom sedge has a root > stem > leaf effect on pollution remediation. The elimination of cadmium from the soil around the anode can be as high as 75.1 percent. The clearance rate of the soil near the anode was 75.1 percent and 77.9 percent, respectively, when the anode cadmium mass fraction dropped fast. Hence this paper focuses on the reduction of cadmium pollution to improve the quality of GVP crop to yield more benefit. Chemical leaching is faster, more efficient, and less dangerous, with a higher application value. The approach of bioremediation is of low cost and creates no secondary contaminants. Physical electrodynamics is easy to understand and has a distinct effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broom sedge planting may reduce soil cadmium pollution by 9.78 percent.

Taxon
broom sedgeAnatherum virginicume0
Treatment
broom sedge plantinge0
Outcome
cadmium pollutione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
9.78 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anatherum virginicum
Anatherum virginicum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil restoration with broom sedge planting might result in a 9.78 percent reduction in cadmium pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–709 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broom sedge showed a root greater than stem greater than leaf pattern in pollution remediation.

Taxon
broom sedgeAnatherum virginicume0
Organ / stage
root > stem > leafe0
Outcome
pollution remediatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anatherum virginicum
Anatherum virginicum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting broom sedge has a root > stem > leaf effect on pollution remediation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anode soil cadmium removal reached 75.1 percent.

Outcome
elimination of cadmium from the soil around the anodee0
Direction
as high ase0
Value
75.1 percente0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The elimination of cadmium from the soil around the anode can be as high as 75.1 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–878 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical leaching was described as faster, more efficient and less dangerous.

Outcome
faster, more efficient, and less dangerouse0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical leaching is faster, more efficient, and less dangerous, with a higher application value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioremediation was described as low cost and without secondary contaminants.

Outcome
low cost and creates no secondary contaminantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The approach of bioremediation is of low cost and creates no secondary contaminants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1328 · show in text ↑