Paper · 2022 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Soil Acidity Conditioning the Productivity and Physiology of Wheat Inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense

Thomas Newton Martin; Marlo Bison Pinto; Luciane Almeri Tabaldi; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The increase in the world population creates the need for sustainable food production and the use of synthetic fertilizers with growth-promoting bacteria. The objective of this research was to evaluate the acidity on the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and treated with osmoprotective additives. Combinations of A. brasilense, osmoprotectant and chemical treatment were evaluated in wheat seeds planted in contrasting acidity soil (pHs: 4.8 and 6.5). Evaluations of the physiological parameters were carried out in the foliar tissue (hydrogen peroxide content, superoxide dismutase activity, lipid peroxidation, content of chlorophyll a, b, and total and carotenoid and nitrate reductase enzyme activity) during the vegetative period and flowering. The grain yield components were evaluated after the physiological maturation. Plants grown in uncorrected soil acidity (pH: 4.8) showed higher lipid peroxidation. The other plants (pH: 6.5) have higher levels of nitrate reductase. Higher nitrate reductase activity was also observed in plants inoculated with A. brasilense. Therefore, in soil acidity 6.5, both A. brasilense isolate or combined with osmoprotective additive increased the grain yield. Nevertheless, the osmoprotectant application did not attenuate the effects of the chemical treatment of seeds and exerted a negative effect to inoculation with A. brasilense.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grown in uncorrected soil acidity (pH 4.8) had higher lipid peroxidation than at pH 6.5.

Treatment
uncorrected soil acidity (pH: 4.8)e2
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
pH: 6.5e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–308 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants grown in uncorrected soil acidity (pH: 4.8) showed higher lipid peroxidation. The other plants (pH: 6.5) have higher levels of nitrate reductase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat at pH 6.5 had higher nitrate reductase levels than at uncorrected pH 4.8.

Treatment
pH: 6.5e2
Outcome
nitrate reductasee2
Direction
higher levelse2
Comparator
uncorrected soil acidity (pH: 4.8)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–308 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants grown in uncorrected soil acidity (pH: 4.8) showed higher lipid peroxidation. The other plants (pH: 6.5) have higher levels of nitrate reductase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1034 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity was higher in wheat inoculated with A. brasilense.

Treatment
plants inoculated with A. brasilensee3
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee3symbiont
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye3
Direction
Highere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–308 · show in text ↑
e3

“Higher nitrate reductase activity was also observed in plants inoculated with A. brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. brasilense isolate increased wheat grain yield at soil pH 6.5.

Treatment
A. brasilense isolatee4
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee4symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
in soil acidity 6.5e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–308 · show in text ↑
e4

“Therefore, in soil acidity 6.5, both A. brasilense isolate or combined with osmoprotective additive increased the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined A. brasilense with osmoprotective additive increased wheat grain yield at soil pH 6.5.

Treatment
combined with osmoprotective additivee4
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee4symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
in soil acidity 6.5e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–308 · show in text ↑
e4

“Therefore, in soil acidity 6.5, both A. brasilense isolate or combined with osmoprotective additive increased the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The osmoprotectant application did not attenuate the effects of the chemical seed treatment on wheat.

Treatment
osmoprotectant applicatione5
Outcome
effects of the chemical treatment of seedse5
Direction
did not attenuatee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–308 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nevertheless, the osmoprotectant application did not attenuate the effects of the chemical treatment of seeds and exerted a negative effect to inoculation with A. brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The osmoprotectant application had a negative effect on wheat inoculation with A. brasilense.

Treatment
osmoprotectant applicatione5
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee5symbiont
Outcome
inoculation with A. brasilensee5
Direction
negative effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the physiological and productive variables of wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–308 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nevertheless, the osmoprotectant application did not attenuate the effects of the chemical treatment of seeds and exerted a negative effect to inoculation with A. brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1429 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

ph · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.