Abstract
An experiment was conducted during 2019 and 2020 at College of Agriculture, Sumerpur (Rajasthan) to study the effect of organic weed management and organic nutrient management treatments practices on maize (Zea mays L.)in split plot design with 3 replications.The two years mean data revealed that the minimum weed infestation (79.1%) and maximum weed control efficiency (93.1%) was recorded in weed free check as against weedy check among various weed management treatments at harvest. Most of the growth attributes, grain (3.36 t ha-1) and stover (6.26 t ha-1) yield of maize were significantly affected by weed management and nutrient management practices and found maximum in weed free check maintained up to 60 DAS closely followed by stale seedbed+ hoeing once at 20 DAS + straw mulch applied @ 5 t ha-1 at 30 DAS against weedy check. The application of vermicompost @ 75% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN i.e. 90 kg N equivalent) in two splits (75% at sowing +25% as top dressing at 30 DAS) along with seed treatment with fermented beejamurt and two sprays of jeevamurt registered significantly hgher growth parameters besides grain yield of 3.17 t ha-1as compared to 100% RDN through FYM. The mean gross return, net return and B:C ratio were significantly affected by various weed and nutrient management practice and maximum values were recorded with weedy check and 755% RDN through vermicompost + STB + JT, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Weed free management produced minimum weed infestation of 79.1%.
- Treatment
- weed free checke0
- Outcome
- weed infestatione0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 79.1%e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum weed infestation (79.1%) and maximum weed control efficiency (93.1%) was recorded in weed free check as against weedy check”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed free management had maximum weed control efficiency of 93.1%.
- Treatment
- weed free checke0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 93.1%e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum weed control efficiency (93.1%) was recorded in weed free check as against weedy check”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed free management up to 60 DAS maximized maize growth attributes.
- Treatment
- weed free check maintained up to 60 DASe0
- Outcome
- growth attributese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Most of the growth attributes, grain (3.36 t ha-1) and stover (6.26 t ha-1) yield of maize were significantly affected by weed management and nutrient management practices and found maximum in weed free check maintained up to 60 DAS closely followed by stale seedbed+ hoeing once at 20 DAS + straw mulch applied @ 5 t ha-1 at 30 DAS against weedy check”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed free management produced maximum grain yield of 3.36 t ha-1.
- Treatment
- weed free check maintained up to 60 DASe0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.36 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain (3.36 t ha-1) and stover (6.26 t ha-1) yield of maize were significantly affected by weed management and nutrient management practices and found maximum in weed free check maintained up to 60 DAS closely followed by stale seedbed+ hoeing once at 20 DAS + straw mulch applied @ 5 t ha-1 at 30 DAS against weedy check”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed free management produced maximum stover yield of 6.26 t ha-1.
- Treatment
- weed free check maintained up to 60 DASe0
- Outcome
- stovere0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 6.26 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“stover (6.26 t ha-1) yield of maize were significantly affected by weed management and nutrient management practices and found maximum in weed free check maintained up to 60 DAS closely followed by stale seedbed+ hoeing once at 20 DAS + straw mulch applied @ 5 t ha-1 at 30 DAS against weedy check”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost with beejamurt and jeevamurt increased growth parameters relative to FYM.
- Treatment
- vermicompost @ 75% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN i.e. 90 kg N equivalent)e0
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- hghere0
- Comparator
- 100% RDN through FYMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of vermicompost @ 75% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN i.e. 90 kg N equivalent) in two splits (75% at sowing +25% as top dressing at 30 DAS) along with seed treatment with fermented beejamurt and two sprays of jeevamurt registered significantly hgher growth parameters besides grain yield of 3.17 t ha-1as compared to 100% RDN through FYM”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost with beejamurt and jeevamurt produced 3.17 t ha-1 grain yield versus FYM.
- Treatment
- vermicompost @ 75% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN i.e. 90 kg N equivalent)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- hghere0
- Value
- 3.17 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- 100% RDN through FYMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of vermicompost @ 75% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN i.e. 90 kg N equivalent) in two splits (75% at sowing +25% as top dressing at 30 DAS) along with seed treatment with fermented beejamurt and two sprays of jeevamurt registered significantly hgher growth parameters besides grain yield of 3.17 t ha-1as compared to 100% RDN through FYM”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross return reached a maximum under the reported weed and nutrient practices.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean gross return, net return and B:C ratio were significantly affected by various weed and nutrient management practice and maximum values were recorded with weedy check and 755% RDN through vermicompost + STB + JT, respectively”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Net return reached a maximum under the reported weed and nutrient practices.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean gross return, net return and B:C ratio were significantly affected by various weed and nutrient management practice and maximum values were recorded with weedy check and 755% RDN through vermicompost + STB + JT, respectively”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit to cost ratio reached a maximum under the reported weed and nutrient practices.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean gross return, net return and B:C ratio were significantly affected by various weed and nutrient management practice and maximum values were recorded with weedy check and 755% RDN through vermicompost + STB + JT, respectively”
t0“maize”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
139 papers more in this group
See all 143 papers →herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
402 papers more in this group
See all 406 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
744 papers more in this group
See all 748 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.