Paper · 2022 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Root characteristics and yield of rice as affected by the cultivation pattern of strong seedlings with increased planting density and reduced nitrogen application

Xian-jiao GUAN; Jin CHEN; Xian-mao CHEN; et al.

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

To address the relationships between the amount of nitrogen fertilizer application and the yield of double cropping rice systems, we investigated the effects of a cultivation pattern of strong seedlings with increased planting density and reduced nitrogen application (SDN) on the morphological and physiological characteristics of double cropping rice. Our results indicated that the effects of SDN on the morphological characteristics of the single plant roots of double cropping rice were not significant, but the morphological characteristics of the population roots were largely different. Specifically, SDN significantly increased the morphological indexes of the root population such as root fresh weight, root volume, root number, root length and root dry weight. The effects of SDN on the total root absorption areas and root active absorption areas of the single plants were non-significant, but it dramatically enhanced the total root absorption areas and root active absorption areas of the plant population during the tillering, heading and mature stages. In addition, SDN significantly increased the root bleeding intensity and elevated the soluble sugar and free amino acid contents of root bleeding sap. Compared to the traditional cultivation pattern (CK), SDN significantly increased root bleeding intensity at the heading stage by 4.37 and 8.90% for early and late rice, respectively. Meanwhile, SDN profoundly enhanced the soluble sugar contents of root bleeding sap by 12.85 and 10.41% for early and late rice, respectively. In addition, SDN also significantly enhanced free amino acid content of root bleeding sap by 43.25% for early rice and by 37.50% for late rice systems compared to CK. Furthermore, SDN increased the actual yield of double cropping rice mainly due to the higher effective panicle number and the larger seed-setting rate. The actual yields of early rice under SDN were higher than CK by 9.37 and 5.98% in 2016 and 2017, and the actual yields of late rice under SDN were higher than CK by 0.20 and 1.41% in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that the significant positive correlations were observed between the majority of the root indexes and the actual yield across the four different growth stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN had no significant effect on single-plant root morphology.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
morphological characteristics of the single plant rootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of SDN on the morphological characteristics of the single plant roots of double cropping rice were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN increased population root fresh weight, volume, number, length and dry weight.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
root fresh weight, root volume, root number, root length and root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN significantly increased the morphological indexes of the root population such as root fresh weight, root volume, root number, root length and root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN did not significantly affect single-plant root absorption areas.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
total root absorption areas and root active absorption areas of the single plantse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of SDN on the total root absorption areas and root active absorption areas of the single plants were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN enhanced population total and active root absorption areas at tillering, heading and maturity.

Organ / stage
tillering, heading and mature stagese0
Treatment
increased planting density and reduced nitrogen applicationt0
Outcome
total root absorption areas and root active absorption areas of the plant populatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it dramatically enhanced the total root absorption areas and root active absorption areas of the plant population during the tillering, heading and mature stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice as affected by the cultivation pattern of strong seedlings with increased planting density and reduced nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN increased root bleeding intensity at heading by 4.37% in early rice.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
root bleeding intensitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.37e0
Qualifier
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN significantly increased root bleeding intensity at the heading stage by 4.37 and 8.90% for early and late rice, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN increased root bleeding intensity at heading by 8.90% in late rice.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
root bleeding intensitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.90%e0
Qualifier
latee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN significantly increased root bleeding intensity at the heading stage by 4.37 and 8.90% for early and late rice, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN increased root bleeding sap soluble sugar by 12.85% in early rice.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
soluble sugar contents of root bleeding sape0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12.85e0
Qualifier
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN profoundly enhanced the soluble sugar contents of root bleeding sap by 12.85 and 10.41% for early and late rice, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN increased root bleeding sap soluble sugar by 10.41% in late rice.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
soluble sugar contents of root bleeding sape0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
10.41%e0
Qualifier
latee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN profoundly enhanced the soluble sugar contents of root bleeding sap by 12.85 and 10.41% for early and late rice, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN increased free amino acids in bleeding sap by 43.25% in early rice.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
free amino acid content of root bleeding sape0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
43.25%e0
Qualifier
earlye0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN also significantly enhanced free amino acid content of root bleeding sap by 43.25% for early rice and by 37.50% for late rice systems compared to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN increased free amino acids in bleeding sap by 37.50% in late rice.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
free amino acid content of root bleeding sape0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
37.50%e0
Qualifier
latee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN also significantly enhanced free amino acid content of root bleeding sap by 43.25% for early rice and by 37.50% for late rice systems compared to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1711 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SDN raised rice yield mainly through more effective panicles and greater seed setting.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
actual yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
higher effective panicle number and the larger seed-setting ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDN increased the actual yield of double cropping rice mainly due to the higher effective panicle number and the larger seed-setting rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-rice yield under SDN exceeded CK by 9.37% in 2016.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
actual yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.37e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“actual yields of early rice under SDN were higher than CK by 9.37 and 5.98% in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-rice yield under SDN exceeded CK by 5.98% in 2017.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
actual yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.98%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“actual yields of early rice under SDN were higher than CK by 9.37 and 5.98% in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-rice yield under SDN exceeded CK by 0.20% in 2016.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
actual yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.20e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“actual yields of late rice under SDN were higher than CK by 0.20 and 1.41% in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-rice yield under SDN exceeded CK by 1.41% in 2017.

Treatment
SDNe0
Outcome
actual yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.41%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“actual yields of late rice under SDN were higher than CK by 0.20 and 1.41% in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2062 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most root indexes correlated positively and significantly with yield across four growth stages.

Organ / stage
four different growth stagese0
Outcome
actual yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
majority of the root indexese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive correlations were observed between the majority of the root indexes and the actual yield across the four different growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2267 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑

density · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.