Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Ecology

The negative effects of soil microorganisms on plant growth only extend to the first weeks

Jing Zhang; Peter G L Klinkhamer; Klaas Vrieling; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Soil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance. In this paper, we ask the question: how long-lasting the effect of the soil microbial community on plant growth is. We examined the plant growth rates at three stages: early, mid and late growth. We performed two growth experiments with Jacobaea vulgaris, which lasted 49 and 63 days in sterilized soil or live soil. In a third experiment, we examined the effect of the timing of soil inoculation prior to planting on the relative growth rate of J. vulgaris with four different timing treatments. In all experiments, differences in biomass of plants grown in sterilized soil and live soil increased throughout the experiment. Also, the relative growth rate of plants in the sterilized soil was only significantly higher than that of plants in the live soil in the first two to three weeks. In the third experiment, plant biomass decreased with increasing time between inoculation and planting. Overall, our results showed that plants of J. vulgaris grew less well in live soil than in sterilized soil. The negative effects of soil inoculation on plant mass appeared to extend over the whole growth period but arise from the negative effects on relative growth rates that occurred in the first weeks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass differences between sterilized and live soil increased throughout all experiments.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
sterilized soile0
Interactor
Soil biotic communitiese2other
Outcome
differences in biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
throughout the experimente0
Comparator
live soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all experiments, differences in biomass of plants grown in sterilized soil and live soil increased throughout the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“We performed two growth experiments with Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–326 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate was significantly higher in sterilized than live soil only during the first two to three weeks.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
sterilized soile0
Interactor
Soil biotic communitiese2other
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in the first two to three weekse0
Comparator
live soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, the relative growth rate of plants in the sterilized soil was only significantly higher than that of plants in the live soil in the first two to three weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“We performed two growth experiments with Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–326 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass decreased as the interval between soil inoculation and planting increased.

Taxon
J. vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
increasing time between inoculation and plantinge0
Interactor
Soil biotic communitiese2other
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the third experiment, plant biomass decreased with increasing time between inoculation and planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“the relative growth rate of J. vulgaris with four different timing treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–567 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J. vulgaris grew less well in live than sterilized soil.

Taxon
J. vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise0
Treatment
live soile0
Interactor
Soil biotic communitiese1other
Outcome
grew less welle0
Direction
less welle0
Comparator
sterilized soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, our results showed that plants of J. vulgaris grew less well in live soil than in sterilized soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Persistent negative effects of soil inoculation on plant mass appeared to arise from reduced relative growth rates in the first weeks.

Taxon
J. vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
soil inoculatione0
Interactor
Soil biotic communitiese2other
Outcome
plant masse0
Qualifier
arise from the negative effects on relative growth rates that occurred in the first weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effects of soil inoculation on plant mass appeared to extend over the whole growth period but arise from the negative effects on relative growth rates that occurred in the first weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants of J. vulgaris grew less well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–71 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Jacobaea vulgaris (stinking willie)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.