Paper · 2018 · New Phytologist

Removal of soil biota alters soil feedback effects on plant growth and defense chemistry

Minggang Wang; Weibin Ruan; Olga Kostenko; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We examined how the removal of soil biota affects plant-soil feedback (PSF) and defense chemistry of Jacobaea vulgaris, an outbreak plant species in Europe containing the defense compounds pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs). Macrofauna and mesofauna, as well as fungi and bacteria, were removed size selectively from unplanted soil or soil planted with J. vulgaris exposed or not to above- or belowground insect herbivores. Wet-sieved fractions, using 1000-, 20-, 5- and 0.2-μm mesh sizes, were added to sterilized soil and new plants were grown. Sieving treatments were verified by molecular analysis of the inocula. In the feedback phase, plant biomass was lowest in soils with 1000- and 20-μm inocula, and soils conditioned with plants gave more negative feedback than without plants. Remarkably, part of this negative PSF effect remained present in the 0.2-μm inoculum where no bacteria were present. PA concentration and composition of plants with 1000- or 20-μm inocula differed from those with 5- or 0.2-μm inocula, but only if soils had been conditioned by undamaged plants or plants damaged by aboveground herbivores. These effects correlated with leaf hyperspectral reflectance. We conclude that size-selective removal of soil biota altered PSFs, but that these PSFs were also influenced by herbivory during the conditioning phase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant biomass was lowest with 1000- and 20-μm soil inocula.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
1000- and 20-μm inoculae0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant biomass was lowest in soils with 1000- and 20-μm inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–698 · show in text ↑
e1

“defense chemistry of Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soils conditioned with plants gave more negative plant-soil feedback than soils without plants.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
soils conditioned with plantse0
Outcome
feedbacke0
Direction
more negativee0
Comparator
without plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soils conditioned with plants gave more negative feedback than without plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“defense chemistry of Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some negative plant-soil feedback persisted in the 0.2-μm inoculum without bacteria.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
0.2-μm inoculume0
Outcome
negative PSF effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“part of this negative PSF effect remained present in the 0.2-μm inoculum where no bacteria were present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“defense chemistry of Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentration differed between larger and smaller soil inoculum fractions under specified conditioning.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
1000- or 20-μm inoculae0
Outcome
PA concentratione0
Direction
differede0
Qualifier
only if soils had been conditioned by undamaged plants or plants damaged by aboveground herbivorese0
Comparator
5- or 0.2-μm inoculae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PA concentration and composition of plants with 1000- or 20-μm inocula differed from those with 5- or 0.2-μm inocula, but only if soils had been conditioned by undamaged plants or plants damaged by aboveground herbivores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“defense chemistry of Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant pyrrolizidine alkaloid composition differed between larger and smaller soil inoculum fractions under specified conditioning.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Treatment
1000- or 20-μm inoculae0
Outcome
PA concentration and compositione0
Direction
differede0
Comparator
5- or 0.2-μm inoculae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PA concentration and composition of plants with 1000- or 20-μm inocula differed from those with 5- or 0.2-μm inocula, but only if soils had been conditioned by undamaged plants or plants damaged by aboveground herbivores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“defense chemistry of Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These soil fraction effects correlated with leaf hyperspectral reflectance.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarise1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
leaf hyperspectral reflectancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects correlated with leaf hyperspectral reflectance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“defense chemistry of Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–118 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Jacobaea vulgaris (stinking willie)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.