Paper · 2009 · Plant and Soil

Soil-borne microorganisms and soil-type affect pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Jacobaea vulgaris

Lotte Joosten; Patrick P. J. Mulder; Peter G. L. Klinkhamer; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Secondary metabolites like pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) play a crucial part in plant defense. We studied the effects of soil-borne microorganisms and soil-type on pyrrolizidine alkaloids in roots and shoots of Jacobaea vulgaris. We used clones of two genotypes from a dune area (Meijendel), propagated by tissue culture and grown on two sterilized soils and sterilized soils inoculated with 5% of non-sterilized soil of either of the two soil-types. Soil-borne microorganisms and soil-type affected the composition of PAs. By changing the composition rather than the total concentration below and aboveground, plants have a more complex defense strategy than formerly thought. Interestingly, a stronger negative effect on plant growth was found in sterilized soils inoculated with their ‘own’ microbial community suggesting that pathogenic and/or other plant inhibiting microorganisms were adapted to their ‘own’ soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbes and soil type altered PA composition.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarist0
Treatment
Soil-borne microorganisms and soil-typee0
Interactor
Soil-borne microorganismse0other
Outcome
composition of PAse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-borne microorganisms and soil-type affected the composition of PAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants changed PA composition rather than total concentration.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarist0
Organ / stage
below and abovegrounde0
Outcome
composition rather than the total concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changing the composition rather than the total concentration below and aboveground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with a plant’s own soil microbial community had a stronger negative effect on growth.

Taxon
Jacobaea vulgarisJacobaea vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculated with their ‘own’ microbial communitye0
Interactor
microbial communitye0other
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
stronger negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jacobaea vulgaris
Jacobaea vulgaris · TaxonJulie Anne Workman · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a stronger negative effect on plant growth was found in sterilized soils inoculated with their ‘own’ microbial community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jacobaea vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–91 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Jacobaea vulgaris (stinking willie)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.