Paper · 2021 · Journal of AgriSearch

Evaluation of INM on Growth, Yield and Quality of Summer Cowpea [Vigna unguiculatal (L) Walp.] Under Doab region of Uttar - Pradesh

OMBIR SINGH; SANDEEP KUMAR; ARUN KUMAR; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agriculture Research farm of Chaudhary Chhotu Ram(PG) College Muzaffarnagar during summer season of 2019 and 2020 to evaluate the Integrated Nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of summer cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.) under Doab region of Uttar Pradesh. There were sixteen treatments combinations with four fertility levels (Control - F0, 50% RDF - F1, 75% RDF - F2 and 100% RDF - F3) and bio - organics (control - B0, PSB - B1, Vermicompost @2t/ha - B2 and B1+B2 = B3) and tested in a Randomized block Design with three replication. The recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) was considered as 20 kg N, 40 kg P2O5 and 40 kg K2O/ha. Results indicated that application of 75% RDF - F2 being at bar with that of 100% RDF (F3) but significantly superior in respect to all the growth as well as yield and yield attributes to other treatments tested in study. Further analysis of data clearly indicate that application of vermicompost @2t/ha being at per with PSB + Vermicompost, but superior to other treatments. Combined application of 75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2) proved to be the best treatment in terms of pod / plant, seed yield and N uptake as well as protein production. Net return work out of different treatment combination in this study is also witness this fact.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF matched 100% RDF and exceeded other treatments for growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
75% RDF - F2e0
Outcome
growth as well as yield and yield attributese0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Comparator
100% RDF (F3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF - F2 being at bar with that of 100% RDF (F3) but significantly superior in respect to all the growth as well as yield and yield attributes to other treatments tested in study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost matched PSB plus vermicompost and exceeded other treatments.

Treatment
vermicompost @2t/hae0
Outcome
superior to other treatmentse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
PSB + Vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of vermicompost @2t/ha being at per with PSB + Vermicompost, but superior to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF with vermicompost was best for cowpea pod / plant.

Treatment
75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2)e0
Outcome
pod / plante0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2) proved to be the best treatment in terms of pod / plant, seed yield and N uptake as well as protein production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF with vermicompost was best for cowpea seed yield.

Treatment
75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2) proved to be the best treatment in terms of pod / plant, seed yield and N uptake as well as protein production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF with vermicompost was best for cowpea N uptake.

Treatment
75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2)e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2) proved to be the best treatment in terms of pod / plant, seed yield and N uptake as well as protein production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF with vermicompost was best for cowpea protein production.

Treatment
75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2)e0
Outcome
protein productione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 75% RDF and Vermicompost @2t/ha (F2B2) proved to be the best treatment in terms of pod / plant, seed yield and N uptake as well as protein production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns supported the advantage of the combined treatment.

Outcome
Net returne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net return work out of different treatment combination in this study is also witness this fact.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.