Paper · 2022 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

A Preliminary Study on Inducing Naomi Mango Trees to Produce an Additional Crop

M Ayed; M Sharaf; M Khamis; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted on 7 years old Naomi mango trees budded on Succary rootstock, grown under drip irrigation in sandy soil orchard at Wady EL-Natroon, EL-Behaira Governorate, Egypt during (2019-2020) and (2020-2021) seasons. Specific and interaction effects of shading with ceroon net, inflorescence thinning and their combinations were investigated. Most evaluated parameters responded specifically to shading application i.e., two yield measurements (No. & weight of fruits /tree), fruit weight, pulp%, TSS% and TSS/Acid ratio of shaded trees were significantly higher than those of non shaded ones. Meanwhile, total sugars and vitamin C did not respond considerably. Such trend was detected with both common and additional crops. As for the specific effect of inflorescences thinning application both crops followed two conflicted trends. With the secondry (additional) crop thinning especially at 50% increased it obviously (10 times much more as control), while decreased its most fruit quality (fruit weight, pulp%, TSS%, total sugars% and vitamin C content). The revers was detected with the common crop parameters. Concerning interaction effect, specific effect of each factor reflected on their combinations, whereas the greatest yield values (No. & weight /tree) of the secondry crop was significantly coupled with the 50% thinned trees under shading application. While, good fruit quality was exhibited by the common crop of the nonthinned trees especially shaded ones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly raised fruit number and fruit weight per tree.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
shaded treese0
Outcome
No. & weight of fruits /treee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non shaded onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two yield measurements (No. & weight of fruits /tree), fruit weight, pulp%, TSS% and TSS/Acid ratio of shaded trees were significantly higher than those of non shaded ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly raised fruit weight, pulp percentage and TSS percentage.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
shaded treese0
Outcome
fruit weight, pulp%, TSS%e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non shaded onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight, pulp%, TSS% and TSS/Acid ratio of shaded trees were significantly higher than those of non shaded ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly raised the TSS to acid ratio.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
shaded treese0
Outcome
TSS/Acid ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non shaded onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSS/Acid ratio of shaded trees were significantly higher than those of non shaded ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugars and vitamin C did not respond considerably to shading in both crops.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
shadinge1
Outcome
total sugars and vitamin Ce0
Direction
did not respond considerablye0
Qualifier
both common and additional cropse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total sugars and vitamin C did not respond considerably. Such trend was detected with both common and additional crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“responded specifically to shading application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% thinning increased the additional crop approximately tenfold compared with control.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
thinning especially at 50%e0
Outcome
secondry (additional) crope0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10 timese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the secondry (additional) crop thinning especially at 50% increased it obviously (10 times much more as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning lowered the additional crop fruit weight, pulp, TSS, total sugars and vitamin C.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
thinninge1
Outcome
fruit weight, pulp%, TSS%e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
secondry (additional) crope1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased its most fruit quality (fruit weight, pulp%, TSS%, total sugars% and vitamin C content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the secondry (additional) crop thinning especially at 50% increased it obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning lowered additional crop total sugars and vitamin C.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
thinninge1
Outcome
total sugars% and vitamin C contente0
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total sugars% and vitamin C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the secondry (additional) crop thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–899 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased its most fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning produced the reverse pattern in the common crop.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
inflorescences thinning applicatione1
Outcome
common crop parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The revers was detected with the common crop parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“inflorescences thinning application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest additional crop fruit count and weight per tree occurred with 50% thinning under shading.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
50% thinned trees under shading applicatione0
Outcome
yield values (No. & weight /tree)e0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
secondry crope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatest yield values (No. & weight /tree) of the secondry crop was significantly coupled with the 50% thinned trees under shading application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Good common crop fruit quality occurred in nonthinned trees, especially shaded trees.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
nonthinned trees especially shaded onese0
Outcome
good fruit qualitye0
Qualifier
common crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“good fruit quality was exhibited by the common crop of the nonthinned trees especially shaded ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Naomi Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–49 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

shade · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

shade · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.