Paper · 2021 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

MITIGATION OF EXCESSIVE SOLAR RADIATION AND WATER STRESS ON ‘KEITT’ MANGO Mangifera indica TREES THROUGH SHADING

Ayman E.A. Shaban; Ahmed A. Rashedy; Mohammed I.M. El-Banna

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Excessive solar radiation “global warming” and water scarcity are consider the main environmental constraints for plant growth and production under arid and semi-arid regions. The current research was aimed to study the effect of irrigation levels (100%, 85%, 70% of irrigation requirements), and shading levels (60%, 40%, 0%) on the growth and productivity of ‘Keitt’ mango trees. This experiment was conducted during two growing seasons (2016/2017 and 2017/2018) at El Behera Governorate, Egypt. Decreasing irrigation level (IR) decreased leaf area, malformed panicle, powdery mildew infection, final fruit set, fruit numbers, yield but it increased chlorophyll content, proline content, leaf water content. While, increasing shading levels (SH) increased leaves number, leaf area, fruit set, powdery mildew infection, malformed panicle but it decreased fruit sunburn damage, proline content, chlorophyll content and relative water content. Moreover, accumulative effects of 85% IR + 40% SH significantly increased leaf area, fruit set, fruit number, yield, chlorophyll content, WUE, proline content, relative water content, leaf water content while decreasing powdery mildew and sunburn damage. Results suggest that shading at 40% increased the yield up to 20% and decreased sunburn damage up to 0% under irrigation level of 70%. Shading may be a new technique to alleviate the adverse effects of water stress beside their role in avoiding excessive solar radiation on ‘Keitt’ mango trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation decreased mango leaf area, malformed panicles and powdery mildew infection.

Treatment
Decreasing irrigation levele0
Outcome
leaf area, malformed panicle, powdery mildew infectione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing irrigation level (IR) decreased leaf area, malformed panicle, powdery mildew infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation decreased final fruit set, fruit numbers and yield.

Treatment
Decreasing irrigation levele0
Outcome
final fruit set, fruit numbers, yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing irrigation level (IR) decreased leaf area, malformed panicle, powdery mildew infection, final fruit set, fruit numbers, yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation increased chlorophyll, proline and leaf water content.

Treatment
Decreasing irrigation levele1
Outcome
chlorophyll content, proline content, leaf water contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased chlorophyll content, proline content, leaf water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–708 · show in text ↑
e1

“Decreasing irrigation level (IR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater shading increased mango leaf number, leaf area and fruit set.

Treatment
increasing shading levelse0
Outcome
leaves number, leaf area, fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing shading levels (SH) increased leaves number, leaf area, fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater shading increased powdery mildew infection and malformed panicles.

Treatment
increasing shading levelse0
Outcome
powdery mildew infection, malformed paniclee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing shading levels (SH) increased leaves number, leaf area, fruit set, powdery mildew infection, malformed panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater shading decreased sunburn damage, proline and chlorophyll content.

Treatment
increasing shading levelse1
Outcome
fruit sunburn damage, proline content, chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased fruit sunburn damage, proline content, chlorophyll content and relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing shading levels (SH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater shading decreased relative water content.

Treatment
increasing shading levelse1
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased fruit sunburn damage, proline content, chlorophyll content and relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing shading levels (SH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 85% irrigation and 40% shading significantly increased leaf area, fruit set and fruit number.

Treatment
85% IR + 40% SHe0
Outcome
leaf area, fruit set, fruit numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“85% IR + 40% SH significantly increased leaf area, fruit set, fruit number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 85% irrigation and 40% shading significantly increased yield, chlorophyll and water-use efficiency.

Treatment
85% IR + 40% SHe0
Outcome
yield, chlorophyll content, WUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“85% IR + 40% SH significantly increased leaf area, fruit set, fruit number, yield, chlorophyll content, WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 85% irrigation and 40% shading significantly increased proline, relative water and leaf water content.

Treatment
85% IR + 40% SHe0
Outcome
proline content, relative water content, leaf water contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“85% IR + 40% SH significantly increased leaf area, fruit set, fruit number, yield, chlorophyll content, WUE, proline content, relative water content, leaf water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 85% irrigation and 40% shading decreased powdery mildew and sunburn damage.

Treatment
85% IR + 40% SHe0
Outcome
powdery mildew and sunburn damagee0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“85% IR + 40% SH significantly increased leaf area, fruit set, fruit number, yield, chlorophyll content, WUE, proline content, relative water content, leaf water content while decreasing powdery mildew and sunburn damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70% irrigation, 40% shading increased yield up to 20%.

Treatment
shading at 40%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
under irrigation level of 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shading at 40% increased the yield up to 20% and decreased sunburn damage up to 0% under irrigation level of 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70% irrigation, 40% shading decreased sunburn damage to 0%.

Treatment
shading at 40%e0
Outcome
sunburn damagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0%e0
Qualifier
under irrigation level of 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shading at 40% increased the yield up to 20% and decreased sunburn damage up to 0% under irrigation level of 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango Mangifera indica”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest shading to alleviate water stress and excessive radiation in Keitt mango.

Material
‘Keitt’e0
Outcome
alleviate the adverse effects of water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading may be a new technique to alleviate the adverse effects of water stress beside their role in avoiding excessive solar radiation on ‘Keitt’ mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1491 · show in text ↑

shade · physiology: water · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

shade · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.