Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Bioresource Science

Improving Quantitative and Qualitative Properties of Cotton Through the Use of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers Under Water Deficit Stress Conditions

Amir Rahimi

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Water deficit stress and poor soil fertility in arid and semi-arid regions are the most important factors limiting the growth and yield of cotton plants. A factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design in a research farm in the Ardabil (Moghan), Iran, in the 2019-2020 crop year with three replications. Experimental treatments included moisture levels at three levels (40, 60, and 80% of field capacity) and fertilizer application at four levels (vermicompost, cattle manure, chemical fertilizers (urea and triple superphosphate), and control). The results showed that the content of photosynthetic pigments decreased significantly with delay in irrigation. At the same time, the highest amounts of proline, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide were observed in irrigation conditions of 40% moisture of field capacity. Application of organic and chemical fertilizers compared to the control showed a significant effect on increasing the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids. The relative water content, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and oil percentage increased by 32, 24, 23, and 26% in optimal irrigation conditions and 28, 21, 15, and 20% in moderate stress conditions and 23, 16, 14, and 19, respectively, in severe stress conditions due to vermicompost application compared to treatment without fertilizer. Due to vermicompost application in irrigation conditions, maximum grain yield (2558.33 kg ha - 1), fiber yield (1117.04 kg ha -1 ), oil yield (651.81 kg ha -1 ), and oil percentage (25.48%) were obtained, with 80% of field capacity obtained. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that in conditions of low irrigation, the application of organic fertilizers is more effective in improving the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of cotton. It is better to increase the yield of agricultural products from vermicompost and cattle manure instead of chemical fertilizers, to be used to reduce environmental pollution and their production costs to achieve a sustainable agricultural.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed irrigation significantly reduced cotton photosynthetic pigment content.

Treatment
delay in irrigatione0
Outcome
content of photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“the content of photosynthetic pigments decreased significantly with delay in irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

proline was highest at 40% field capacity.

Treatment
40% moisture of field capacitye0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest amounts of proline, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide were observed in irrigation conditions of 40% moisture of field capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

malondialdehyde was highest at 40% field capacity.

Treatment
40% moisture of field capacitye0
Outcome
malondialdehydee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest amounts of proline, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide were observed in irrigation conditions of 40% moisture of field capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

hydrogen peroxide was highest at 40% field capacity.

Treatment
40% moisture of field capacitye0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest amounts of proline, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide were observed in irrigation conditions of 40% moisture of field capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and chemical fertilizer application significantly increased chlorophyll a.

Treatment
organic and chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of organic and chemical fertilizers compared to the control showed a significant effect on increasing the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and chemical fertilizer application significantly increased chlorophyll b.

Treatment
organic and chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of organic and chemical fertilizers compared to the control showed a significant effect on increasing the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and chemical fertilizer application significantly increased total chlorophyll.

Treatment
organic and chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of organic and chemical fertilizers compared to the control showed a significant effect on increasing the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and chemical fertilizer application significantly increased carotenoids.

Treatment
organic and chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of organic and chemical fertilizers compared to the control showed a significant effect on increasing the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased relative water content, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and oil percentage across irrigation levels.

Treatment
vermicompost applicatione0
Outcome
relative water content, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and oil percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
optimal irrigation conditionse0
Comparator
treatment without fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The relative water content, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and oil percentage increased by 32, 24, 23, and 26% in optimal irrigation conditions and 28, 21, 15, and 20% in moderate stress conditions and 23, 16, 14, and 19, respectively, in severe stress conditions due to vermicompost application compared to treatment without fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80% field capacity with vermicompost, cotton grain yield reached 2558.33 kg ha - 1.

Treatment
vermicompost applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2558.33 kg ha - 1e0
Qualifier
80% of field capacitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Due to vermicompost application in irrigation conditions, maximum grain yield (2558.33 kg ha - 1), fiber yield (1117.04 kg ha -1 ), oil yield (651.81 kg ha -1 ), and oil percentage (25.48%) were obtained, with 80% of field capacity obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80% field capacity with vermicompost, cotton fiber yield reached 1117.04 kg ha -1.

Treatment
vermicompost applicatione0
Outcome
fiber yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1117.04 kg ha -1e0
Qualifier
80% of field capacitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Due to vermicompost application in irrigation conditions, maximum grain yield (2558.33 kg ha - 1), fiber yield (1117.04 kg ha -1 ), oil yield (651.81 kg ha -1 ), and oil percentage (25.48%) were obtained, with 80% of field capacity obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80% field capacity with vermicompost, cotton oil yield reached 651.81 kg ha -1.

Treatment
vermicompost applicatione0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
651.81 kg ha -1e0
Qualifier
80% of field capacitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Due to vermicompost application in irrigation conditions, maximum grain yield (2558.33 kg ha - 1), fiber yield (1117.04 kg ha -1 ), oil yield (651.81 kg ha -1 ), and oil percentage (25.48%) were obtained, with 80% of field capacity obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80% field capacity with vermicompost, cotton oil percentage reached 25.48%.

Treatment
vermicompost applicatione0
Outcome
oil percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
25.48%e0
Qualifier
80% of field capacitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Due to vermicompost application in irrigation conditions, maximum grain yield (2558.33 kg ha - 1), fiber yield (1117.04 kg ha -1 ), oil yield (651.81 kg ha -1 ), and oil percentage (25.48%) were obtained, with 80% of field capacity obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1614 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend organic fertilizers under low irrigation for cotton quality and quantity.

Outcome
application of organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“in conditions of low irrigation, the application of organic fertilizers is more effective in improving the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1838 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend vermicompost and cattle manure in place of chemical fertilizers to increase yield and reduce pollution and costs.

Outcome
vermicompost and cattle manure instead of chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“It is better to increase the yield of agricultural products from vermicompost and cattle manure instead of chemical fertilizers, to be used to reduce environmental pollution and their production costs to achieve a sustainable agricultural.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–2078 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 9 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.