Paper · 2022 · Plant-Environment Interactions

Effects of superhydrophobic sand mulching on evapotranspiration and phenotypic responses in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants under normal and reduced irrigation

Kennedy Odokonyero; Adair Gallo; Vinicius Dos Santos; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Irrigated agriculture in arid and semi‐arid regions is a vital contributor to the global food supply. However, these regions endure massive evaporative losses that are compensated by exploiting limited freshwater resources. To increase water‐use efficiency in these giga‐scale operations, plastic mulches are utilized; however, their non‐biodegradability and eventual land‐filling renders them unsustainable. In response, we have developed superhydrophobic sand (SHS) mulching technology that is comprised of sand grains or sandy soils with a nanoscale coating of paraffin wax. Here, we investigate the effects of 1 cm‐thick SHS mulching on the evapotranspiration and phenotypic responses of tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) plants as a model system under normal and reduced irrigation inside controlled growth chambers. Experimental results reveal that under either irrigation scenario, SHS mulching suppresses evaporation and enhances transpiration by 78% and 17%, respectively relative to the unmulched soil. Comprehensive phenotyping revealed that SHS mulching enhanced root xylem vessel diameter, stomatal aperture, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll content index by 21%, 25%, 28%, and 23%, respectively, in comparison with the unmulched soil. Consequently, total fruit yields, total dry mass, and harvest index increased in SHS‐mulched plants by 33%, 20%, and 16%, respectively compared with the unmulched soil. We also provide mechanistic insights into the effects of SHS mulching on plant physiological processes. These results underscore the potential of SHS for realizing food–water security and greening initiatives in arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching suppresses evaporation by 78% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS mulchinge0
Outcome
evaporatione0
Direction
suppressese0
Value
78%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental results reveal that under either irrigation scenario, SHS mulching suppresses evaporation and enhances transpiration by 78% and 17%, respectively relative to the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching enhances transpiration by 17% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS mulchinge0
Outcome
transpiratione0
Direction
enhancese0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental results reveal that under either irrigation scenario, SHS mulching suppresses evaporation and enhances transpiration by 78% and 17%, respectively relative to the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching enhanced root xylem vessel diameter by 21% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS mulchinge0
Outcome
root xylem vessel diametere0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comprehensive phenotyping revealed that SHS mulching enhanced root xylem vessel diameter, stomatal aperture, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll content index by 21%, 25%, 28%, and 23%, respectively, in comparison with the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching enhanced stomatal aperture by 25% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS mulchinge0
Outcome
stomatal aperturee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comprehensive phenotyping revealed that SHS mulching enhanced root xylem vessel diameter, stomatal aperture, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll content index by 21%, 25%, 28%, and 23%, respectively, in comparison with the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching enhanced stomatal conductance by 28% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS mulchinge0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comprehensive phenotyping revealed that SHS mulching enhanced root xylem vessel diameter, stomatal aperture, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll content index by 21%, 25%, 28%, and 23%, respectively, in comparison with the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching enhanced chlorophyll content index by 23% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS mulchinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll content indexe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comprehensive phenotyping revealed that SHS mulching enhanced root xylem vessel diameter, stomatal aperture, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll content index by 21%, 25%, 28%, and 23%, respectively, in comparison with the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching increased total fruit yields by 33% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS‐mulched plantse0
Outcome
total fruit yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, total fruit yields, total dry mass, and harvest index increased in SHS‐mulched plants by 33%, 20%, and 16%, respectively compared with the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching increased total dry mass by 20% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS‐mulched plantse0
Outcome
total dry masse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, total fruit yields, total dry mass, and harvest index increased in SHS‐mulched plants by 33%, 20%, and 16%, respectively compared with the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHS mulching increased harvest index by 16% relative to unmulched soil.

Treatment
SHS‐mulched plantse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
unmulched soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, total fruit yields, total dry mass, and harvest index increased in SHS‐mulched plants by 33%, 20%, and 16%, respectively compared with the unmulched soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–128 · show in text ↑

mulching · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

growing medium · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

growing medium · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

mulching · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.