Paper · 2005 · Mycologia

The response of ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculum to long-term increases in nitrogen supply

Peter G. Avis; Iris Charvat

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The inoculum of ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi was examined in a 16 y long nitrogen fertilization experiment maintained in a temperate oak savanna. To measure EM fungal inoculum, bur oak seedlings were grown in three types of bioassays: (i) intact soil cores that measure inoculum such as spores, mycelia and mycorrhizal roots; (ii) resistant propagule bioassays that measure inoculum types resistant to soil drying; and (iii) previously mycorrhizal root bioassays that measure the ability of EM fungi to colonize new roots from mycorrhizal roots. Colonization of bur oak seedlings was characterized by morphotyping and where necessary by restriction analysis and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing. Fourteen morphotypes were found in intact soil core bioassays with species of Cortinarius, Cenococcum and Russula abundant. Five morphotypes were found in resistant propagule bioassays with Cenococcum, a thelephoroid morphotype and a Wilcoxina-like ascomycete abundant and frequent. In intact soil core bioassays total percent root colonization and number of morphotypes were not affected by N supply in 2000 and 2001. However the composition of EM fungi colonizing oak seedling roots was different with increased N supply such that Russula spp. (primarily Russula aff. amoenolens) were most abundant at the highest level of N supply. Dominant Russula spp. did not colonize any roots in resistant propagule bioassays but did colonize oak seedling roots from previously mycorrhizal roots. Results suggest that in this savanna N supply can influence the kinds of inoculum propagules present and thereby might affect the dynamics of ectomycorrhizal communities by differentially influencing reproductive and colonization strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen ectomycorrhizal morphotypes were found in intact soil core bioassays.

Interactor
Cortinarius, Cenococcum and RussulaRussulaCenococcumCortinariuse0symbiont
Outcome
Fourteen morphotypese0
Value
Fourteen morphotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus macrocarpa
Quercus macrocarpa · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Russula
Russula · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Debivort at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cenococcum
Cenococcum · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Cwfernandez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cortinarius
Cortinarius · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)JJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourteen morphotypes were found in intact soil core bioassays with species of Cortinarius, Cenococcum and Russula abundant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“To measure EM fungal inoculum, bur oak seedlings were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five ectomycorrhizal morphotypes were found in resistant propagule bioassays.

Outcome
Five morphotypese0
Value
Five morphotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus macrocarpa
Quercus macrocarpa · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five morphotypes were found in resistant propagule bioassays with Cenococcum, a thelephoroid morphotype and a Wilcoxina-like ascomycete abundant and frequent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“To measure EM fungal inoculum, bur oak seedlings were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root colonization percentage and morphotype number were unaffected by nitrogen supply in intact soil cores in 2000 and 2001.

Treatment
N supplye0
Outcome
total percent root colonization and number of morphotypese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus macrocarpa
Quercus macrocarpa · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In intact soil core bioassays total percent root colonization and number of morphotypes were not affected by N supply in 2000 and 2001.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“To measure EM fungal inoculum, bur oak seedlings were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen supply changed the composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi colonizing oak roots, with Russula most abundant at the highest supply.

Taxon
oakQuercuse0
Treatment
increased N supplye0
Interactor
Russula spp.Russulae0symbiont
Outcome
composition of EM fungi colonizing oak seedling rootse0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Russula
Russula · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Debivort at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the composition of EM fungi colonizing oak seedling roots was different with increased N supply such that Russula spp. (primarily Russula aff. amoenolens) were most abundant at the highest level of N supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant Russula did not colonize roots in resistant propagule bioassays.

Interactor
Russula spp.Russulae0symbiont
Outcome
did not colonize any rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus macrocarpa
Quercus macrocarpa · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Russula
Russula · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Debivort at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dominant Russula spp. did not colonize any roots in resistant propagule bioassays but did colonize oak seedling roots from previously mycorrhizal roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“To measure EM fungal inoculum, bur oak seedlings were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant Russula colonized oak seedling roots from previously mycorrhizal roots.

Taxon
oakQuercuse0
Interactor
Russula spp.Russulae0symbiont
Outcome
did colonize oak seedling roots from previously mycorrhizal rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Russula
Russula · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Debivort at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dominant Russula spp. did not colonize any roots in resistant propagule bioassays but did colonize oak seedling roots from previously mycorrhizal roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1493 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · disease · Quercus macrocarpa (bur oak)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.