Paper · 1960 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The intensive production of herbage for crop-drying VII. The effect of further continued massive applications of nitrogen with and without phosphate and potash on the yield of grassland herbage

M. E. Castle; W. Holmes

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. A small-scale plot experiment which had been conducted from 1947 to 1952 to study the effect of massive dressings of fertilizer nitrogen, with and without phosphate and potash, on the yield and quality of a rye-grass dominant sward was continued from 1953 to 1958 with two changes in the mineral treatments in 1953. A 4 × 4 Graeco-Latin square was used. The nitrogen treatments applied each year were: (1) no nitrogenous fertilizer, (2) 260 lb. nitrogen, (3) 520 lb. nitrogen and (4) 416 lb. nitrogen per acre per year. The mineral treatments were: (A) no mineral fertilizer, (B) 336–504 lb. K 2 O per acre per year depending on nitrogen treatment, (C) 101–202 lb. K 2 O and 81–101 lb. P 2 O 5 per acre per year depending on nitrogen treatment, and (D) no mineral fertilizer after 1953, although K 2 O and P 2 O 5 had been applied during the previous 6-year period. All the fertilizers were applied in four or five equal dressings each year, one for each cut. Treatments 1 and 4 were cut four times and treatments 2 and 3 five times per year. 2. Applications of phosphate did not affect the yields of herbage dry matter or crude protein, but yields were severely depressed in the absence of potash. With adequate potash the yields under all nitrogen treatments were maintained for the 6-year period and were at the same level as in the previous 6-year period. The mean yields of dry matter for the 6-year period when potash was applied were 5200, 8420, 10,180 and 9700 lb. per acre per year for treatments, 1, 2, 3 and 4. Without potash the corresponding mean yields were 5460, 6410, 6210 and 6880 lb. Average crude protein yields were 760, 1360, 1940 and 1660 lb. per acre per year with potash and 780, 1100, 1220 and 13201b. without potash. 3. The weighted mean contents of crude protein for the 6-year period averaged over all the mineral treatments were 14·4, 16·7, 19·4 and 18·2% for nitrogen treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4. The mean crudeprotein contents of treatments with and without potash were 16·7 and 17·6%, respectively. 4. The average response to nitrogen was 15·0, 10·9 and 12·4 lb. dry matter per 1 lb. of nitrogen applied on treatments 2, 3 and 4, respectively, compared with a no-clover sward, and 7·8, 7·3 and 7·9 lb. compared with a grass + clover sward. The recovery of nitrogen in terms of crude protein was 45, 40 and 40% for treatments 2, 3 and 4, respectively, when compared with a no-clover sward. 5. The botanical composition of the plots continued to be determined by the nitrogen and potash treatments. On plots receiving ‘Nitro-Chalk’ clover was virtually non-existent, whereas on plots which received potash and no nitrogen, clover was present. With a combination of potash and nitrogen vigorous swards of timothy were found but if only nitrogen and no potash was applied, poorer grasses, such as Festuca rubra , were dominant. 6. Soil analyses showed increased pH values and decreased contents of Mg with increasing applications of ‘Nitro-Chalk’. P 2 O 5 values were low except where phosphate was being applied. The most marked change was in the K 2 O values which varied from 4 units on treatments A and D which received no minerals to 40 units on treatment B which received the heavy dressings of potash. 7. Mineral analyses of the herbage for 1953 and 1958 are given. High K contents were found on treatments where potash was applied and this was associated with decreased Mg and Na contents. 8. Some details are given of a field-scale trial on the Institute farm where high levels of nitrogen and potash have been applied for 11 and 12 years with successful results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate did not affect herbage dry matter or crude protein yields.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
phosphatee1
Outcome
yields of herbage dry matter or crude proteine1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applications of phosphate did not affect the yields of herbage dry matter or crude protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absence of potash severely depressed herbage yields.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
absence of potashe1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
severely depressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields were severely depressed in the absence of potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate potash maintained yields under all nitrogen treatments for six years at the prior six-year level.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
adequate potashe1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
maintainede1
Comparator
previous 6-year periode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“With adequate potash the yields under all nitrogen treatments were maintained for the 6-year period and were at the same level as in the previous 6-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatments differed in herbage crude protein contents.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Outcome
contents of crude proteine1
Value
14·4, 16·7, 19·4 and 18·2%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“The weighted mean contents of crude protein for the 6-year period averaged over all the mineral treatments were 14·4, 16·7, 19·4 and 18·2% for nitrogen treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen responses in dry matter were reported relative to a no-clover sward.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Outcome
response to nitrogene1
Value
15·0, 10·9 and 12·4 lb. dry matter per 1 lb. of nitrogene1
Comparator
no-clover swarde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average response to nitrogen was 15·0, 10·9 and 12·4 lb. dry matter per 1 lb. of nitrogen applied on treatments 2, 3 and 4, respectively, compared with a no-clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2034–2207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen responses were smaller relative to a grass and clover sward.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Outcome
7·8, 7·3 and 7·9 lb.e1
Comparator
grass + clover swarde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“7·8, 7·3 and 7·9 lb. compared with a grass + clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2213–2270 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen recovery as crude protein was 45, 40 and 40% for treatments 2, 3 and 4.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Outcome
recovery of nitrogen in terms of crude proteine1
Value
45, 40 and 40%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“The recovery of nitrogen in terms of crude protein was 45, 40 and 40% for treatments 2, 3 and 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2272–2367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitro-Chalk plots had virtually no clover.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
‘Nitro-Chalk’e1
Outcome
clover was virtually non-existente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“On plots receiving ‘Nitro-Chalk’ clover was virtually non-existent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2529–2595 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash without nitrogen was associated with clover presence.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
potash and no nitrogene1
Outcome
clover was presente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“on plots which received potash and no nitrogen, clover was present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2605–2671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash and nitrogen produced vigorous timothy swards.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
combination of potash and nitrogene1
Outcome
vigorous swards of timothye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“With a combination of potash and nitrogen vigorous swards of timothy were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2673–2752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen without potash favored poorer grasses such as Festuca rubra.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
nitrogen and no potashe1
Outcome
poorer grasses, such as Festuca rubra , were dominante1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“if only nitrogen and no potash was applied, poorer grasses, such as Festuca rubra , were dominant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2757–2854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Nitro-Chalk raised soil pH.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
increasing applications of ‘Nitro-Chalk’e1
Outcome
pH valuese1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased pH values and decreased contents of Mg with increasing applications of ‘Nitro-Chalk’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2880–2974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Nitro-Chalk decreased soil Mg.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
increasing applications of ‘Nitro-Chalk’e1
Outcome
contents of Mge1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased pH values and decreased contents of Mg with increasing applications of ‘Nitro-Chalk’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2880–2974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil phosphate values were low except where phosphate was applied.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Outcome
P 2 O 5 values were lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“P 2 O 5 values were low except where phosphate was being applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2976–3040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K2O ranged from 4 without minerals to 40 under heavy potash.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Outcome
K 2 O valuese1
Value
4 unitse1
Qualifier
40 unitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“K 2 O values which varied from 4 units on treatments A and D which received no minerals to 40 units on treatment B which received the heavy dressings of potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3076–3235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash treatments had high herbage K content.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Treatment
potashe1
Outcome
K contentse1
Direction
Highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“High K contents were found on treatments where potash was applied and this was associated with decreased Mg and Na contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3301–3424 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High herbage K was associated with decreased Mg and Na contents.

Taxon
rye-grassLoliume0
Compound
Ke1
Outcome
Mg and Na contentse1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye-grass dominant sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“High K contents were found on treatments where potash was applied and this was associated with decreased Mg and Na contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3301–3424 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: protein · LoliumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · yield · LoliumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.