Paper · 2016 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response of Two Durum Wheat Cultivars to Irrigation Levels and Nitrogen Fertilizer Splitting

E Teama; A Galal; E Ali; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted at Agronomy Department Experimental Farm, Agriculture Faculty, Assiut University during 2012 / 2013 and 2013/2014 seasons to study the response of two durum wheat cultivars to irrigation levels and nitrogen fertilizer splitting. Three experiments each season were done. Each experiment was subjected to one irrigation level (100, 75 and 50 % of irrigation requirement). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in split - plot arrangement with three replicates. Nitrogen fertilizer splitting (2 and 4 times) were arranged in main - plots and the wheat cultivars (Beni-suef 1 and Agaseed 3) were assigned in sub–plots. The obtained results showed that studied irrigation levels, nitrogen fertilizer splitting and cultivars had a significant effect on all studied traits in the two growing seasons. Here too, the first and second order interactions had a significant influence on the most studied traits in both seasons. Moreover, the highest mean values of grain yield (29.07 ardab fed-1) and NUE (58.13 kg grain/kg N) applied in both seasons were obtained from Beni-suef1 cultivar subjected to I1 irrigation level and received nitrogen fertilizer at four splits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation levels had a significant effect on all studied traits of durum wheat in both seasons.

Treatment
irrigation levelse0
Outcome
all studied traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“studied irrigation levels, nitrogen fertilizer splitting and cultivars had a significant effect on all studied traits in the two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer splitting had a significant effect on all studied traits of durum wheat in both seasons.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer splittinge0
Outcome
all studied traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“studied irrigation levels, nitrogen fertilizer splitting and cultivars had a significant effect on all studied traits in the two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–850 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar had a significant effect on all studied traits of durum wheat in both seasons.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
all studied traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“studied irrigation levels, nitrogen fertilizer splitting and cultivars had a significant effect on all studied traits in the two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First and second order interactions had a significant influence on most studied traits in both seasons.

Treatment
first and second order interactionse0
Outcome
most studied traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“the first and second order interactions had a significant influence on the most studied traits in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield, 29.07 ardab fed-1, came from cultivar Beni-suef1 under the I1 irrigation level with nitrogen applied in four splits.

Material
Beni-suef1e0
Treatment
I1 irrigation level and received nitrogen fertilizer at four splitse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
29.07 ardab fed-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest mean values of grain yield (29.07 ardab fed-1) and NUE (58.13 kg grain/kg N) applied in both seasons were obtained from Beni-suef1 cultivar subjected to I1 irrigation level and received nitrogen fertilizer at four splits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen use efficiency, 58.13 kg grain/kg N, came from cultivar Beni-suef1 under the I1 irrigation level with nitrogen applied in four splits.

Material
Beni-suef1e0
Treatment
I1 irrigation level and received nitrogen fertilizer at four splitse0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
58.13 kg grain/kg Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest mean values of grain yield (29.07 ardab fed-1) and NUE (58.13 kg grain/kg N) applied in both seasons were obtained from Beni-suef1 cultivar subjected to I1 irrigation level and received nitrogen fertilizer at four splits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1216 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 33 positive, 6 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.