Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

In vitro and in vivo Evaluation of Fungicides against False Smut Disease of Rice in Hilly Zone of Karnataka, India

Manjunath Banasode; G. N. Hosagoudar

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The efficacy of six different systemic fungicides and two combi-products were evaluated for inhibition of growth of pathogen at three different concentrations. Among systemic and combi-products fungicides were evaluated, the cent per cent inhibition was observed in Propiconazole 25 % EC, Tebuconazole 250 EC, Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconazole 11.4 % SC and Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WG at all the concentrations. Azoxystrobin 25 % SC resulted in 82.49, 100 and 100 per cent inhibition whereas difenconazole 25 EC recorded 75.08, 80.58, and 100 per cent inhibition of mycelia growth at 100, 200 and 500 ppm concentrations respectively. A field experiment was conducted at AHRS, Ponnampet during Kharif 2017 to find out the effective fungicide for the management of false smut of rice. It was inferred that the treatment with the fungicide Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WP gave the lowest false smut disease severity of 2.80 per cent, which was followed by the Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SC with 6.17 per cent, Propiconazole 25% EC with 10.50 per cent and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC with 15.87 per cent. On comparison with the grain yield obtained from each plot it was found that the treatment with Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WP gave the highest grain yield of 55.42 q/ha which was followed by the Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SC(53.72 q/ha), Propiconazole 25% EC(49.47 q/ha) and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC (48.36q/ha) as against grain yield of 38.68 q/ha in untreated control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole produced complete pathogen growth inhibition at all concentrations.

Treatment
Propiconazole 25 % ECe0
Outcome
cent per cent inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cent per cent inhibition was observed in Propiconazole 25 % EC, Tebuconazole 250 EC, Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconazole 11.4 % SC and Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WG at all the concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole produced complete inhibition at all concentrations.

Treatment
Tebuconazole 250 ECe0
Outcome
cent per cent inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cent per cent inhibition was observed in Propiconazole 25 % EC, Tebuconazole 250 EC, Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconazole 11.4 % SC and Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WG at all the concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin plus Difenconazole produced complete inhibition at all concentrations.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconazole 11.4 % SCe0
Outcome
cent per cent inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cent per cent inhibition was observed in Propiconazole 25 % EC, Tebuconazole 250 EC, Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconazole 11.4 % SC and Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WG at all the concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole plus Trifloxystrobin produced complete inhibition at all concentrations.

Treatment
Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WGe0
Outcome
cent per cent inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cent per cent inhibition was observed in Propiconazole 25 % EC, Tebuconazole 250 EC, Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconazole 11.4 % SC and Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WG at all the concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin inhibited mycelial growth by 82.49, 100 and 100 percent at the respective concentrations.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin 25 % SCe0
Outcome
inhibition of mycelia growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
82.49, 100 and 100 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azoxystrobin 25 % SC resulted in 82.49, 100 and 100 per cent inhibition whereas difenconazole 25 EC recorded 75.08, 80.58, and 100 per cent inhibition of mycelia growth at 100, 200 and 500 ppm concentrations respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenconazole inhibited mycelial growth by 75.08, 80.58 and 100 percent at the respective concentrations.

Treatment
difenconazole 25 ECe0
Outcome
inhibition of mycelia growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
75.08, 80.58, and 100 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“difenconazole 25 EC recorded 75.08, 80.58, and 100 per cent inhibition of mycelia growth at 100, 200 and 500 ppm concentrations respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole plus Trifloxystrobin WP gave the lowest field disease severity, 2.80 percent.

Treatment
Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WPe0
Outcome
false smut disease severitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.80 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WP gave the lowest false smut disease severity of 2.80 per cent, which was followed by the Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SC with 6.17 per cent, Propiconazole 25% EC with 10.50 per cent and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC with 15.87 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin plus Difenconozole had field disease severity of 6.17 percent.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SCe0
Outcome
false smut disease severitye1
Value
6.17 per cente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SC with 6.17 per cent, Propiconazole 25% EC with 10.50 per cent and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC with 15.87 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“false smut disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole had field disease severity of 10.50 percent.

Treatment
Propiconazole 25% ECe0
Outcome
false smut disease severitye1
Value
10.50 per cente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propiconazole 25% EC with 10.50 per cent and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC with 15.87 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“false smut disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin had field disease severity of 15.87 percent.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin 25 % SCe0
Outcome
false smut disease severitye1
Value
15.87 per cente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azoxystrobin 25 % SC with 15.87 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“false smut disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole plus Trifloxystrobin WP produced the highest grain yield, 55.42 q/ha.

Treatment
Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
55.42 q/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25 % WP gave the highest grain yield of 55.42 q/ha which was followed by the Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SC(53.72 q/ha), Propiconazole 25% EC(49.47 q/ha) and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC (48.36q/ha) as against grain yield of 38.68 q/ha in untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin plus Difenconozole produced 53.72 q/ha grain yield.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SCe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
53.72 q/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azoxystrobin 18.2 % + Difenconozole 11.4 % SC(53.72 q/ha), Propiconazole 25% EC(49.47 q/ha) and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC (48.36q/ha) as against grain yield of 38.68 q/ha in untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole produced 49.47 q/ha grain yield.

Treatment
Propiconazole 25% ECe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
49.47 q/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propiconazole 25% EC(49.47 q/ha) and Azoxystrobin 25 % SC (48.36q/ha) as against grain yield of 38.68 q/ha in untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin produced 48.36 q/ha grain yield.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin 25 % SCe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
48.36q/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azoxystrobin 25 % SC (48.36q/ha) as against grain yield of 38.68 q/ha in untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

trifloxystrobin · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

trifloxystrobin · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

tebuconazole · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.