Paper · 2004 · Crop Science

Sorghum and Salinity

Godfrey Wafula Netondo; John Collins Onyango; Erwin Beck

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
49
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crops grown in salt affected soils may suffer from drought stress, ion toxicity, and mineral deficiency leading to reduced growth and productivity. The present study was conducted to determine how salinity affects growth, water relations, and accumulation of cations of nutritional importance in various organs of grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Two Kenyan sorghum varieties, Serena and Seredo, were grown in a greenhouse in quartz sand supplied with a complete nutrient solution to which 0 (control), 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mM NaCl was added. The 250 mM NaCl treatment significantly reduced the relative shoot growth rates, measured 25 d after the start of salt application, by 75 and 73%, respectively, for Serena and Seredo, and stem dry weight by 75 and 53%. In a similar way, young leaves were affected, with leaf blades of both varieties being reduced by 67% while sheaths were reduced by 83 and 87% for Serena and Seredo, respectively. Leaf water potential, osmotic potential, leaf pressure potential, and relative water content significantly declined with increasing salt stress. Roots and stems accumulated substantial amounts of sodium, saturating at 150 mM external NaCl. Accumulation of K+ and Ca2+ in the roots, stems, and leaves was strongly inhibited by salinity. Magnesium concentration of the roots was minimally impaired but that of the stems and leaves was strongly affected. Leaves continuously accumulated sodium, which was preferentially deposited in the sheaths. Mature leaves contained more Ca2+ and Mg2+ than young ones. The two sorghum varieties appear to sequester Na+ predominantly in roots, stems, leaf sheaths, and older leaf blades sparing the growing tissues as a salt tolerance mechanism. Nevertheless, greatly reduced concentrations of Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+ in leaves under salinity could cause cation deficiency which reduces plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 mM NaCl, Serena relative shoot growth rate fell 75%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Material
Serenae0
Treatment
250 mM NaCle0
Outcome
relative shoot growth ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75e0
Qualifier
25 d after the start of salt applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 250 mM NaCl treatment significantly reduced the relative shoot growth rates, measured 25 d after the start of salt application, by 75 and 73%, respectively, for Serena and Seredo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 mM NaCl, Seredo relative shoot growth rate fell 73%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Material
Seredoe0
Treatment
250 mM NaCle0
Outcome
relative shoot growth ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 250 mM NaCl treatment significantly reduced the relative shoot growth rates, measured 25 d after the start of salt application, by 75 and 73%, respectively, for Serena and Seredo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serena stem dry weight declined 75% under 250 mM NaCl.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Value
75e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and stem dry weight by 75 and 53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seredo stem dry weight declined 53% under 250 mM NaCl.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Value
53%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and stem dry weight by 75 and 53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young leaf blades of both varieties were reduced by 67%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Organ / stage
leaf bladese0
Outcome
leaf bladese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf blades of both varieties being reduced by 67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serena young leaf sheaths were reduced 83%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Material
Serenae0
Outcome
sheathse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
83e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sheaths were reduced by 83 and 87% for Serena and Seredo, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seredo young leaf sheaths were reduced 87%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Material
Seredoe0
Outcome
sheathse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
87%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sheaths were reduced by 83 and 87% for Serena and Seredo, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water, osmotic and pressure potentials declined with increasing salt stress.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
increasing salt stresse0
Outcome
Leaf water potential, osmotic potential, leaf pressure potentiale0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf water potential, osmotic potential, leaf pressure potential, and relative water content significantly declined with increasing salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative leaf water content declined with increasing salt stress.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
increasing salt stresse0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf water potential, osmotic potential, leaf pressure potential, and relative water content significantly declined with increasing salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots and stems accumulated sodium up to saturation at 150 mM external NaCl.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
Roots and stems accumulated substantial amounts of sodiume0
Direction
saturatinge0
Value
150 mMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roots and stems accumulated substantial amounts of sodium, saturating at 150 mM external NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity strongly inhibited potassium and calcium accumulation in roots, stems and leaves.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
Accumulation of K+ and Ca2+ in the roots, stems, and leavese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulation of K+ and Ca2+ in the roots, stems, and leaves was strongly inhibited by salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root magnesium concentration was minimally impaired by salinity.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
Magnesium concentration of the rootse0
Direction
impairede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium concentration of the roots was minimally impaired”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium concentration in stems and leaves was strongly affected by salinity.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
stems and leavese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of the stems and leaves was strongly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves continuously accumulated sodium, preferentially in sheaths.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Organ / stage
sheathse0
Outcome
Leaves continuously accumulated sodiume0
Direction
accumulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves continuously accumulated sodium, which was preferentially deposited in the sheaths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1501 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature leaves had more calcium and magnesium than young leaves.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Organ / stage
Mature leavese0
Outcome
Ca2+ and Mg2+e0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
young onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mature leaves contained more Ca2+ and Mg2+ than young ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1561 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both sorghum varieties appear to sequester sodium in roots, stems, sheaths and older blades, sparing growing tissue.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Organ / stage
roots, stems, leaf sheaths, and older leaf bladese0
Outcome
sequester Na+e0
Qualifier
salt tolerance mechanisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two sorghum varieties appear to sequester Na+ predominantly in roots, stems, leaf sheaths, and older leaf blades sparing the growing tissues as a salt tolerance mechanism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1737 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced leaf calcium, potassium and magnesium under salinity could cause cation deficiency and reduced growth.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Qualifier
cation deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatly reduced concentrations of Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+ in leaves under salinity could cause cation deficiency which reduces plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1887 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · physiology: ion balance · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.