Paper · 2020 · Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo

COVER CROPS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION - NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS AND AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE GROWN IN SUCESSION

ROMANO ROBERTO VALICHESKI; JORDANO GILBERTO EGER; SIDINEI LEANDRO K. STÜRMER; et al.

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cover crops can contribute differently to the supply of nitrogen to crops. The objective was to evaluate the response of maize to nitrogen doses (0, 70, 140, 210 and 280 kg ha-1) when grown in succession to cover crops (vetch, forage turnip, black oat, ryegrass and fallow). The randomized block experimental design was used, with subdivided plots and four replications. Cover crops were allocated into plots, and N doses into sub-plots. As to cover crops, the aspects evaluated were phytomass production, N content and total accumulated; with regard to maize, the aspects evaluated were SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis evelopment) index, leaf N content, total grain protein, yield and agronomic efficiency of N. Black oat, ryegrass and forage turnip presented higher phytomass production. All species had similar results as to the total N accumulated in the aerial part (average value of 91.06 kg ha-1). In succession to black oat, ryegrass and fallow period, N doses up to 140 kg ha-1 applied in maize result in higher yield and better agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use. Without application of nitrogen (0.0 kg ha1), forage turnip and vetch provided higher total protein content in the grain, yield over 8,550 kg ha-1, and less agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black oat produced higher phytomass.

Taxon
Black oatAvena strigosae0
Outcome
phytomass productione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena strigosa
Avena strigosa · TaxonMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black oat, ryegrass and forage turnip presented higher phytomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–782 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass produced higher phytomass.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume0
Outcome
phytomass productione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black oat, ryegrass and forage turnip presented higher phytomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–782 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage turnip produced higher phytomass.

Taxon
forage turnipe0
Outcome
phytomass productione0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Black oat, ryegrass and forage turnip presented higher phytomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–782 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop species accumulated similar aerial-part nitrogen, averaging 91.06 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Cover cropst0
Outcome
total N accumulated in the aerial parte0
Direction
similare0
Value
91.06 kg ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“All species had similar results as to the total N accumulated in the aerial part (average value of 91.06 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cover crops”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With black oat preceding maize, N up to 140 kg ha-1 produced higher yield and better N-use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N doses up to 140 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
higher yield and better agronomic efficiency of nitrogen usee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
black oate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In succession to black oat, ryegrass and fallow period, N doses up to 140 kg ha-1 applied in maize result in higher yield and better agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With ryegrass preceding maize, N up to 140 kg ha-1 produced higher yield and better N-use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N doses up to 140 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
higher yield and better agronomic efficiency of nitrogen usee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
ryegrasse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In succession to black oat, ryegrass and fallow period, N doses up to 140 kg ha-1 applied in maize result in higher yield and better agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With fallow preceding maize, N up to 140 kg ha-1 produced higher yield and better N-use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N doses up to 140 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
higher yield and better agronomic efficiency of nitrogen usee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
fallow periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In succession to black oat, ryegrass and fallow period, N doses up to 140 kg ha-1 applied in maize result in higher yield and better agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without N application, preceding forage turnip gave higher maize grain protein.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
forage turnipe0
Outcome
total protein content in the graine0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Without application of nitrogen (0.0 kg ha1)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without application of nitrogen (0.0 kg ha1), forage turnip and vetch provided higher total protein content in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without N application, preceding vetch gave higher maize grain protein.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
vetche0
Outcome
total protein content in the graine0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without application of nitrogen (0.0 kg ha1), forage turnip and vetch provided higher total protein content in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without N application, forage turnip preceded maize yield above 8,550 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
forage turnipe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
overe0
Value
8,550 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without application of nitrogen (0.0 kg ha1), forage turnip and vetch provided higher total protein content in the grain, yield over 8,550 kg ha-1, and less agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without N application, vetch preceded maize yield above 8,550 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
vetche0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
overe0
Value
8,550 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without application of nitrogen (0.0 kg ha1), forage turnip and vetch provided higher total protein content in the grain, yield over 8,550 kg ha-1, and less agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without N application, forage turnip preceded lower maize N-use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
forage turnipe0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of nitrogen usee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“forage turnip and vetch provided higher total protein content in the grain, yield over 8,550 kg ha-1, and less agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without N application, vetch preceded lower maize N-use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
vetche0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of nitrogen usee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“forage turnip and vetch provided higher total protein content in the grain, yield over 8,550 kg ha-1, and less agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.