Abstract
Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) improve plant nutrition by solubilizing insoluble phosphorus compounds in alkaline calcareous soils thus improve plant growth of both leguminous and non-leguminous crops. In the present study, two promising PSB strains Bacillus aryabhattai S10 and Bacillus subtilis ZM63 were evaluated for their potential to improve plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops. The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions following completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. The results revealed that co-inoculation with Bacillus aryabhattai S10 and Bacillus subtilis ZM63 exhibited an increased nodulation in mungbean which was measured in terms of nodules number, and nodules fresh and dry weight as compared to sole inoculation. This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops. It increased nitrogen (N) concentration up to 142 and 18%, phosphorus (P) concentration up to 90 and 43%, and potassium (K) concentration up to 71 and 44%, in shoots of mungbean and maize crops, respectively. It is concluded that the tested PSB strains Bacillus aryabhattai S10 and Bacillus subtilis ZM63 have the potential to be used as promising bio-inoculants to maximize plant growth and nutritional status of the crop for sustainable production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation with Bacillus aryabhattai S10 and Bacillus subtilis ZM63 increased nodulation of mungbean compared with sole inoculation.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- co-inoculation with Bacillus aryabhattai S10 and Bacillus subtilis ZM63e0
- Interactor
- Bacillus aryabhattai S10Priestia aryabhattaie0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Bacillus subtilis ZM63
Bacillus subtilise0symbiont - Outcome
- nodulatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- nodules number, and nodules fresh and dry weighte0
- Comparator
- sole inoculatione0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“co-inoculation with Bacillus aryabhattai S10 and Bacillus subtilis ZM63 exhibited an increased nodulation in mungbean which was measured in terms of nodules number, and nodules fresh and dry weight as compared to sole inoculation”
e1“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation of bacterial strains increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse0
- Outcome
- plant growth and nutritional statuse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e1“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation of bacterial strains increased plant growth and nutritional status of maize.
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse0
- Outcome
- plant growth and nutritional statuse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse1
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e1“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased nitrogen concentration in mungbean shoots by 142%.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse1
- Outcome
- nitrogen (N) concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 142e0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased nitrogen (N) concentration up to 142 and 18%, phosphorus (P) concentration up to 90 and 43%, and potassium (K) concentration up to 71 and 44%, in shoots of mungbean and maize crops, respectively”
e1“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e2“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased nitrogen concentration in maize shoots by 18%.
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse1
- Outcome
- nitrogen (N) concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18%e0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased nitrogen (N) concentration up to 142 and 18%, phosphorus (P) concentration up to 90 and 43%, and potassium (K) concentration up to 71 and 44%, in shoots of mungbean and maize crops, respectively”
e1“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e2“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased phosphorus concentration in mungbean shoots by 90%.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse1
- Outcome
- phosphorus (P) concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 90e0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased nitrogen (N) concentration up to 142 and 18%, phosphorus (P) concentration up to 90 and 43%, and potassium (K) concentration up to 71 and 44%, in shoots of mungbean and maize crops, respectively”
e1“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e2“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased phosphorus concentration in maize shoots by 43%.
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse1
- Outcome
- phosphorus (P) concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 43%e0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased nitrogen (N) concentration up to 142 and 18%, phosphorus (P) concentration up to 90 and 43%, and potassium (K) concentration up to 71 and 44%, in shoots of mungbean and maize crops, respectively”
e1“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e2“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased potassium concentration in mungbean shoots by 71%.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse1
- Outcome
- potassium (K) concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 71e0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased nitrogen (N) concentration up to 142 and 18%, phosphorus (P) concentration up to 90 and 43%, and potassium (K) concentration up to 71 and 44%, in shoots of mungbean and maize crops, respectively”
e1“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e2“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased potassium concentration in maize shoots by 44%.
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of bacterial strainse1
- Outcome
- potassium (K) concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 44%e0
- Setting
- wire house conditionse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased nitrogen (N) concentration up to 142 and 18%, phosphorus (P) concentration up to 90 and 43%, and potassium (K) concentration up to 71 and 44%, in shoots of mungbean and maize crops, respectively”
e1“This co-inoculation of bacterial strains also increased plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops”
e2“The experiment was conducted in pots under wire house conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
The tested PSB strains have potential for use as bio-inoculants to maximize plant growth and nutritional status of mungbean and maize crops.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEAN AND MAIZE CROPSt0
- Interactor
- Bacillus aryabhattai S10Priestia aryabhattaie0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Bacillus subtilis ZM63Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
- Outcome
- maximize plant growth and nutritional statuse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the tested PSB strains Bacillus aryabhattai S10 and Bacillus subtilis ZM63 have the potential to be used as promising bio-inoculants to maximize plant growth and nutritional status of the crop”
t0“MUNGBEAN AND MAIZE CROPS”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
125 papers more in this group
See all 129 papers →inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
695 papers more in this group
See all 699 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.