Paper · 1963 · Annals of Botany

Metabolism of Barley Leaves Inoculated with Erysiphe graminis Mérat

F. T. LAST

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Inoculating Proctor barley leaves with Erysiphe graminis decreased rates of photosynthesis, after an initial lag period, and increased respiration. Increasing the area inoculated progressively decreased rates of photosynthesis, but the effects cannot be attributed to a simple loss of leaf area. When less than 30 per cent of a leaf was inoculated, decreases were equivalent to area losses greater than those inoculated; when more than 30 per cent was inoculated the photo-synthetic losses were equivalent to area losses less than those inoculated. Although the relative effects of E. graminis on photosynthesis and respiration were of the same order, the absolute effects on photosynthesis were greater than those on respiration. Inoculating 30 per cent of a leaf decreased photosynthesis by 5–6 mg CO2/dm2/hr from 12.9 in the uninoculated controls to 7.3. Respiration increased by 0.6 mg CO2/dm/hr, from 1.7 to 2.3-

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation decreased photosynthesis after a lag.

Material
Proctore0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Inoculating Proctor barley leaves with Erysiphe graminise0
Interactor
Erysiphe graminisBlumeria graminise0pathogen
Outcome
rates of photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
after an initial lag periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating Proctor barley leaves with Erysiphe graminis decreased rates of photosynthesis, after an initial lag period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased respiration.

Material
Proctore0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Inoculating Proctor barley leaves with Erysiphe graminise0
Interactor
Erysiphe graminisBlumeria graminise0pathogen
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating Proctor barley leaves with Erysiphe graminis decreased rates of photosynthesis, after an initial lag period, and increased respiration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger inoculated area progressively decreased photosynthesis.

Treatment
Increasing the area inoculatede0
Outcome
rates of photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the area inoculated progressively decreased rates of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below 30 per cent inoculated area, photosynthetic loss exceeded the area inoculated.

Outcome
decreasese0
Direction
greater thane0
Qualifier
less than 30 per cent of a leafe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When less than 30 per cent of a leaf was inoculated, decreases were equivalent to area losses greater than those inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 30 per cent inoculated area, photosynthetic loss was less than the area inoculated.

Outcome
photo-synthetic lossese0
Direction
less thane0
Qualifier
more than 30 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when more than 30 per cent was inoculated the photo-synthetic losses were equivalent to area losses less than those inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absolute effects on photosynthesis exceeded those on respiration.

Outcome
absolute effects on photosynthesise0
Direction
greater thane0
Comparator
respiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the absolute effects on photosynthesis were greater than those on respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculating 30 per cent of a leaf decreased photosynthesis by 5–6 mg CO2/dm2/hr.

Treatment
Inoculating 30 per cent of a leafe0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5–6 mg CO2/dm2/hre0
Qualifier
from 12.9 in the uninoculated controls to 7.3e0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating 30 per cent of a leaf decreased photosynthesis by 5–6 mg CO2/dm2/hr from 12.9 in the uninoculated controls to 7.3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Respiration increased by 0.6 mg CO2/dm/hr.

Outcome
Respiratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.6 mg CO2/dm/hre0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration increased by 0.6 mg CO2/dm/hr, from 1.7 to 2.3-”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: respiration · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.