Paper · 2018 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effects of Intercropping with Post-Grafting Generation of Impatiens balsamina on Nitrogen Uptake of Grape Seedlings under Cadmium Stress

Hongqiang Chen; Lijin Lin; Dan Xia; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of intercropping with post-grafting generation of Impatiens balsamina on nitrogen content in each part of grape seedlings and the alkaline nitrogen content in soil. Results showed that under cadmium stress, intercropping with post-grafting generation of I. balsamina (intercropping with I. balsamina of non-grafting, intercropping with post-grafting generation of self-rooted grafting by the same one seedlings of I. balsamina intercropping with post-grafting generation of self-rooted grafting by the two same sizes seedlings of I. balsamina intercropping with post-grafting generation of self-rooted grafting by the two different sizes seedlings of I. balsamina) reduced the nitrogen content in each part of the grape seedlings compared with monoculture. But all the intercropping treatment increased the soil alkaline nitrogen content compared with monoculture. In conclusion, intercropping with post-grafting generation of I. balsamina reduced the nitrogen content of grape seedlings and increasing the soil alkaline nitrogen content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with Impatiens reduced nitrogen content in grape seedling parts relative to monoculture under cadmium stress.

Taxon
grape seedlingse0
Treatment
intercropping with post-grafting generation of I. balsaminae0
Interactor
I. balsaminaImpatiens balsaminae0weed
Outcome
nitrogen content in each part of the grape seedlingse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
under cadmium stresse0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Impatiens balsamina
Impatiens balsamina · InteractorFlorantsika · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under cadmium stress, intercropping with post-grafting generation of I. balsamina (intercropping with I. balsamina of non-grafting, intercropping with post-grafting generation of self-rooted grafting by the same one seedlings of I. balsamina intercropping with post-grafting generation of self-rooted grafting by the two same sizes seedlings of I. balsamina intercropping with post-grafting generation of self-rooted grafting by the two different sizes seedlings of I. balsamina) reduced the nitrogen content in each part of the grape seedlings compared with monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping treatments increased soil alkaline nitrogen versus monoculture.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
intercropping treatmente0
Interactor
Impatiens balsaminaImpatiens balsaminat0weed
Outcome
soil alkaline nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Impatiens balsamina
Impatiens balsamina · InteractorFlorantsika · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the intercropping treatment increased the soil alkaline nitrogen content compared with monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impatiens balsamina on Nitrogen Uptake of Grape Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–115 · show in text ↑

Impatiens balsamina · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.