Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

No Effect of Biostimulants on the Growth, Yield and Nutritional Value of Shallots Grown for Bunch Harvest

Anna Francke; Joanna Majkowska-Gadomska; Zdzisław Kaliniewicz; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas, mostly to harvest mature bulbs with dry scales. Due to their exceptional taste and nutritional value, and a short growing season, they can also be grown for early bunch harvest. New shallot cultivation strategies are being sought to meet consumers’ growing expectations regarding the quality of vegetables, and their increasing awareness of global food safety. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of selected biostimulants on the biometric parameters, yield and nutritional value of shallot bulbs and leaves. The experimental factors were as follows: two biostimulant types—Effective Microorganisms (EM) and Goëmar Goteo (GG), two shallot cultivars—Bonilla F1 and Matador F1, grown for bunch harvest, and year of the study. Shallot leaves had a higher content of L-ascorbic acid, reducing sugars and nitrates than bulbs. Young bulbs had a higher content of DM and total sugars than leaves. The leaves and bulbs of shallot plants treated with EM accumulated the highest amounts of minerals. Macronutrient ratios were closer to optimal in shallot leaves than bulbs. The nitrate content of bulbs was inversely proportional to the nitrate content of leaves. Therefore, an increase in the nitrate content of leaves by around 330% led to an approximately 40% decrease in the nitrate content of bulbs. The correlations between the parameters of the chemical composition of shallots and shallot leaves show that the increase in the dry matter content of the bulbs (by approx. 60%) was accompanied by an increase in the L-ascorbic acid content in the leaves (by approx. 240%). The use of biostimulants in the cultivation of A. cepa L. Aggregatum group contributed to the reduction of L-ascorbic acid content in bulbs and had no positive effect on the leaves. Moreover, no positive effect of biostimulants on the reduction of nitrate content in shallot leaves and bulbs was observed, which is undesirable from the consumer’s point of view. After the use of biopreparations, the yield of shallots was lower than that of the control—by approx. 14% (EM) and approx. 4% (GG). Therefore, the measurable benefits of biostimulants in the cultivation of shallots grown for early bunch harvest do not balance the costs of their purchase and use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallot leaves had higher L-ascorbic acid, reducing sugar and nitrate content than bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
L-ascorbic acid, reducing sugars and nitratese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
bulbse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shallot leaves had a higher content of L-ascorbic acid, reducing sugars and nitrates than bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–917 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young bulbs had higher dry matter and total sugar content than leaves.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
Young bulbse3
Outcome
DM and total sugarse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
leavese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“Young bulbs had a higher content of DM and total sugars than leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM treatment led to the highest mineral amounts in shallot leaves and bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
leaves and bulbse4
Treatment
EMe4
Outcome
mineralse4
Direction
highest amountse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“The leaves and bulbs of shallot plants treated with EM accumulated the highest amounts of minerals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1086 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macronutrient ratios were closer to optimal in shallot leaves than in bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
leavese5
Outcome
Macronutrient ratiose5
Direction
closer to optimale5
Comparator
bulbse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“Macronutrient ratios were closer to optimal in shallot leaves than bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb nitrate content was inversely proportional to leaf nitrate content.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Compound
nitratee6
Outcome
nitrate content of bulbse6
Direction
inversely proportionale6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“The nitrate content of bulbs was inversely proportional to the nitrate content of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A rise of about 330% in leaf nitrate was associated with about a 40% decrease in bulb nitrate content.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Compound
nitratee7
Outcome
nitrate content of bulbse7
Direction
decreasee7
Value
40%e7
Qualifier
an increase in the nitrate content of leaves by around 330%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“Therefore, an increase in the nitrate content of leaves by around 330% led to an approximately 40% decrease in the nitrate content of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1391 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased dry matter of bulbs (about 60%) was accompanied by a rise of about 240% in leaf L-ascorbic acid.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Compound
L-ascorbic acide1
Outcome
L-ascorbic acid content in the leavese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
240%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the increase in the dry matter content of the bulbs (by approx. 60%) was accompanied by an increase in the L-ascorbic acid content in the leaves (by approx. 240%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1664 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased dry matter content of bulbs (about 60%) was accompanied by a leaf L-ascorbic acid rise.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
bulbse1
Outcome
dry matter content of the bulbse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
60%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the increase in the dry matter content of the bulbs (by approx. 60%) was accompanied by an increase in the L-ascorbic acid content in the leaves (by approx. 240%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants reduced L-ascorbic acid content in bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
bulbse2
Treatment
biostimulantse2
Compound
L-ascorbic acide2
Outcome
L-ascorbic acid content in bulbse2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“The use of biostimulants in the cultivation of A. cepa L. Aggregatum group contributed to the reduction of L-ascorbic acid content in bulbs and had no positive effect on the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants had no positive effect on the leaves.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
biostimulantse2
Outcome
effect on the leavese2
Direction
no positive effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“The use of biostimulants in the cultivation of A. cepa L. Aggregatum group contributed to the reduction of L-ascorbic acid content in bulbs and had no positive effect on the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants had no positive effect on reducing nitrate content in shallot leaves and bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
shallot leaves and bulbse3
Treatment
biostimulantse3
Outcome
reduction of nitrate contente3
Direction
no positive effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moreover, no positive effect of biostimulants on the reduction of nitrate content in shallot leaves and bulbs was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM reduced shallot yield by about 14% compared with the control.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Treatment
EMe4
Outcome
yield of shallotse4
Direction
lowere4
Value
approx. 14%e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“After the use of biopreparations, the yield of shallots was lower than that of the control—by approx. 14% (EM) and approx. 4% (GG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goëmar Goteo reduced shallot yield by about 4% compared with the control.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Treatment
GGe4
Outcome
yield of shallotse4
Direction
lowere4
Value
approx. 4%e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“After the use of biopreparations, the yield of shallots was lower than that of the control—by approx. 14% (EM) and approx. 4% (GG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The measurable benefits of biostimulants do not balance their purchase and use costs in shallots grown for early bunch harvest.

Taxon
Allium cepa L. Aggregatum groupAllium cepae0
Outcome
measurable benefits of biostimulantse5
Direction
do not balancee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallots (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum group) are cultivated on small areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“Therefore, the measurable benefits of biostimulants in the cultivation of shallots grown for early bunch harvest do not balance the costs of their purchase and use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2323 · show in text ↑

other · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 82 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.