Paper · 2022 · Horticulture Research

Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of self- and hetero-grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in grapevine

Haixia Zhong; Zhongjie Liu; Fuchun Zhang; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
42
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Grafting, which joins a scion from a cultivar with the stem of a rootstock from a grapevine wild relative, is commonly used in viticulture. Grafting has crucial effects on various phenotypes of the cultivar, including its phenology, biotic and abiotic resistance, berry metabolome, and coloration, but the underlying genetics and regulatory mechanisms are largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated the phenotypic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic profiles at three developmental stages (45, 75, and 105 days after flowering) of the Crimson Seedless cultivar (Vitis vinifera) grafted onto four rootstocks (three heterografts, CS/101-14, CS/SO4, and CS/110R and one self-graft, CS/CS) with own-rooted graft-free Crimson Seedless (CS) as the control. All the heterografts had a significant effect on berry reddening as early as ~45 days after flowering. The grafting of rootstocks promoted anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulation in grape berries. The metabolomic features showed that cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside, malvidin 3-O-glucoside, peonidin 3-O-glucoside, and petunidin 3-O-glucoside were the pigments responsible for the purplish-red peel color. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes, from upstream (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase) to downstream (anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase and anthocyanidin synthase), were upregulated with the accumulation of anthocyanins in the heterografted plants. At the same time, all these genes were also highly expressed and more anthocyanin was accumulated in self-grafted CS/CS samples compared with own-rooted graft-free CS samples, suggesting that self-grafting may also have promoted berry reddening in grapevine. Our results reveal global transcriptomic and metabolomic features in berry color regulation under different grafting conditions that may be useful for improving berry quality in viticulture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterografts significantly affected berry reddening at about 45 days after flowering.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
heterograftse0
Outcome
berry reddeninge0
Value
~45 days after floweringe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the heterografts had a significant effect on berry reddening as early as ~45 days after flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock grafting promoted grape berry anthocyanin accumulation.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
berriese0
Treatment
grafting of rootstockse0
Outcome
anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The grafting of rootstocks promoted anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulation in grape berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–963 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five named anthocyanins were identified as pigments responsible for purplish-red peel color.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
peele0
Outcome
pigments responsible for the purplish-red peel colore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside, malvidin 3-O-glucoside, peonidin 3-O-glucoside, and petunidin 3-O-glucoside were the pigments responsible for the purplish-red peel color.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin biosynthesis genes were upregulated with anthocyanin accumulation in heterografts.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
heterograftede0
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia-lyasee0
Outcome
anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genese0
Direction
upregulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes, from upstream (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase) to downstream (anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase and anthocyanidin synthase), were upregulated with the accumulation of anthocyanins in the heterografted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same genes were more highly expressed in self-grafts than own-rooted plants.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
self-grafted CS/CSe0
Outcome
all these genese0
Direction
highly expressede0
Comparator
own-rooted graft-free CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all these genes were also highly expressed and more anthocyanin was accumulated in self-grafted CS/CS samples compared with own-rooted graft-free CS samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-grafts accumulated more anthocyanin than own-rooted plants.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
self-grafted CS/CSe0
Outcome
anthocyanine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
own-rooted graft-free CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more anthocyanin was accumulated in self-grafted CS/CS samples compared with own-rooted graft-free CS samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.