Paper · 2022 · Foods

Co-Application of 1-MCP and Laser Microporous Plastic Bag Packaging Maintains Postharvest Quality and Extends the Shelf-Life of Honey Peach Fruit

Xuerui Li; Sijia Peng; Renying Yu; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
27
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Honey peach (Prunus persica L.) is highly nutritious; it is an excellent source of sugars, proteins, amino acids, vitamins, and mineral elements. However, it is a perishable climacteric fruit that is difficult to preserve. In this study, “Feicheng” honey peach fruit was used as a test material to investigate the synergistic preservation effect of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and laser microporous film (LMF). The peach fruits were fumigated for 24 h with 2 μL L−1 1-MCP, then packed in LMF. In comparison with the control treatment, 1-MCP + LMF treatment markedly decreased the respiration rate, weight loss, and rot rate of peach fruits. Moreover, the combination of 1-MCP and LMF suppressed the increase in soluble solids (SS) and reducing sugars (RS), as well as the decrease in titratable acid (TA) and ascorbic acid (AsA). The combined application also maintained a high protopectin content and low soluble pectin content; it reduced the accumulation of superoxide anions (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Except in a few samples, the catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities were higher when treated by 1-MCP + LMF. Conversely, the phenylalanine deaminase (PAL), peroxidase (POD), lipase, lipoxygenase (LOX), polygalacturonase (PG), β-glucosidase, and cellulase (Cx) activities were lower than in the control. Furthermore, 1-MCP + LMF treatment reduced the relative abundances of dominant pathogenic fungi (e.g., Streptomyces, Stachybotrys, and Issa sp.). The combined treatment improved the relative abundances of antagonistic fungi (e.g., Aureobasidium and Holtermanniella). The results indicated that the co-application of 1-MCP and LMF markedly reduced weight loss and spoilage, delayed the decline of nutritional quality, and inhibited the physiological and biochemical metabolic activities of peach during storage. These changes extended its shelf-life to 28 days at 5 °C. The results provide a reference for the commercial application of this technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment decreased peach respiration rate, weight loss and rot rate relative to control.

Treatment
1-MCP + LMF treatmente0
Outcome
respiration rate, weight loss, and rot ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with the control treatment, 1-MCP + LMF treatment markedly decreased the respiration rate, weight loss, and rot rate of peach fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment suppressed increases in soluble solids and reducing sugars.

Treatment
combination of 1-MCP and LMFe0
Outcome
soluble solids (SS) and reducing sugars (RS)e0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of 1-MCP and LMF suppressed the increase in soluble solids (SS) and reducing sugars (RS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment suppressed declines in titratable and ascorbic acids.

Outcome
titratable acid (TA) and ascorbic acid (AsA)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“as well as the decrease in titratable acid (TA) and ascorbic acid (AsA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment maintained high protopectin content.

Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
protopectin contente0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application also maintained a high protopectin content and low soluble pectin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment maintained low soluble pectin content.

Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
soluble pectin contente0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application also maintained a high protopectin content and low soluble pectin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced accumulation of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide.

Outcome
accumulation of superoxide anions (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it reduced the accumulation of superoxide anions (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT and APX activities were usually higher under combined treatment.

Treatment
1-MCP + LMFe0
Outcome
catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Except in a few samplese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Except in a few samples, the catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities were higher when treated by 1-MCP + LMF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL, POD and lipase activities were lower under combined treatment than control.

Outcome
phenylalanine deaminase (PAL), peroxidase (POD), lipasee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“the phenylalanine deaminase (PAL), peroxidase (POD), lipase, lipoxygenase (LOX), polygalacturonase (PG), β-glucosidase, and cellulase (Cx) activities were lower than in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LOX, PG and β-glucosidase activities were lower under combined treatment than control.

Outcome
lipoxygenase (LOX), polygalacturonase (PG), β-glucosidasee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“lipoxygenase (LOX), polygalacturonase (PG), β-glucosidase, and cellulase (Cx) activities were lower than in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cellulase activity was lower under combined treatment than control.

Outcome
cellulase (Cx) activitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“cellulase (Cx) activities were lower than in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced dominant pathogenic fungal relative abundances.

Treatment
1-MCP + LMF treatmente0
Interactor
StreptomycesStreptomycese0pathogen
Outcome
relative abundances of dominant pathogenic fungie0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Streptomyces
Streptomyces · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP + LMF treatment reduced the relative abundances of dominant pathogenic fungi (e.g., Streptomyces, Stachybotrys, and Issa sp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased relative abundances of antagonistic fungi.

Treatment
combined treatmente0
Interactor
AureobasidiumAureobasidiume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
relative abundances of antagonistic fungie0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aureobasidium
Aureobasidium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)This image was created by user Tom Volk (TomVolk) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment improved the relative abundances of antagonistic fungi (e.g., Aureobasidium and Holtermanniella).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment extended peach shelf life to 28 days at 5 °C.

Outcome
shelf-lifee0
Direction
extendede0
Value
28 dayse0
Qualifier
5 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“These changes extended its shelf-life to 28 days at 5 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1905 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.