Abstract
【Objective】 The study was to research the relationship between the ethylene and the chilling injury.【Method】 'Okubo'peach fruit was used as our materials.Four different treatments(polyethylene packaging without ethylene treatment;5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment;10-20 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment;1-methylcyclopropene treatment and polyethylene packaging with ten holes) were devised in low temperature MA(modified atmosphere) storage stage and 20 ℃ shelf life stage.We evaluated the effects of these treatments on the rot velocity,firmness,soluble solid content,Vc content,conductance,ethylene production and respiration intensity change.【Result】 The results showed that 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment can keep the fine quality of peach fruit until the middle stage of the MA storage,keep its normal respiration and ethylene release,higher soluble solid and Vc content,higher membrane permeability,and lower firmness;10-20 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment was similar to the 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment,but its rot velocity rate was higher than the 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment;1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatment had a later lower ethylene release fastigium than other treatments during the MA storage and 3-day shelf life,and it had a lower respiration velocity,lower membrane permeability,a higher soluble solid and Vc content.1-MCP treatment lost the ability of normal softening even at 20 ℃ at the late period of storage.The airtight PE treatment was better than CK,its rot velocity was lower,its respiration intensity and ethylene release were lower,and its Vc and SSc content were low,its quality was worse during the MA late storage.The impact of the comparison CS was the worst,its rot velocity was the highest,its respiration intensity and ethylene release were the lowest,and its Vc and SSC content were low,so its quality was the worst during the late MA storage.【Conclusion】 In a word,5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment was the best,and it can keep the peach fruit excellent quality during the front and middle storage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment kept the fine quality of peach fruit until the middle stage of MA storage.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- fine qualitye0
- Direction
- keepe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment can keep the fine quality of peach fruit until the middle stage of the MA storage”
Claim · model-written summary
The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment kept normal respiration and ethylene release of peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- normal respiration and ethylene releasee1
- Direction
- keepe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment can keep”
e1“keep its normal respiration and ethylene release”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment gave higher soluble solid and Vc content in peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- soluble solid and Vc contente1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment can keep”
e1“ethylene release,higher soluble solid and Vc content”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment gave higher membrane permeability in peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- membrane permeabilitye1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment can keep”
e1“higher membrane permeability”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment gave lower firmness in peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- firmnesse1
- Direction
- lowere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment can keep”
e1“lower firmness”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 10-20 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment had a higher rot velocity rate than the 5-10 μL/L treatment.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 10-20 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- rot velocity ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“10-20 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment was similar to the 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment,but its rot velocity rate was higher than the 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1-MCP treatment had a later and lower ethylene release peak than other treatments during MA storage and 3-day shelf life.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatmente0
- Outcome
- ethylene release fastigiume1
- Direction
- later lowere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatment had”
e1“a later lower ethylene release fastigium than other treatments”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1-MCP treatment gave a lower respiration velocity in peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatmente0
- Outcome
- respiration velocitye1
- Direction
- lowere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatment had”
e1“a lower respiration velocity”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1-MCP treatment gave lower membrane permeability in peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatmente0
- Outcome
- membrane permeabilitye1
- Direction
- lowere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatment had”
e1“lower membrane permeability”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1-MCP treatment gave a higher soluble solid and Vc content in peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatmente0
- Outcome
- soluble solid and Vc contente1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1-MCP(1-methylcyclopropene)treatment had”
e1“a higher soluble solid and Vc content”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1-MCP treatment lost the ability of normal softening even at 20 degrees C at the late period of storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- normal softeninge0
- Direction
- loste0
- Setting
- 20 ℃e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1-MCP treatment lost the ability of normal softening even at 20 ℃ at the late period of storage”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The airtight PE treatment had a lower rot velocity than CK.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- airtight PE treatmente0
- Outcome
- rot velocitye1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The airtight PE treatment was better than CK”
e1“its rot velocity was lower”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The airtight PE treatment had lower respiration intensity and ethylene release than CK.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- airtight PE treatmente0
- Outcome
- respiration intensity and ethylene releasee1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The airtight PE treatment was better than CK”
e1“its respiration intensity and ethylene release were lower”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The airtight PE treatment had low Vc and SSc content.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- airtight PE treatmente0
- Outcome
- Vc and SSc contente1
- Direction
- lowe1
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The airtight PE treatment was better than CK”
e1“its Vc and SSc content were low”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The airtight PE treatment had worse quality during late MA storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- airtight PE treatmente0
- Outcome
- qualitye1
- Direction
- worsee1
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The airtight PE treatment was better than CK”
e1“its quality was worse during the MA late storage”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The comparison CS had the highest rot velocity.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- comparison CSe0
- Outcome
- rot velocitye1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The impact of the comparison CS was the worst”
e1“its rot velocity was the highest”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The comparison CS had the lowest respiration intensity and ethylene release.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- comparison CSe0
- Outcome
- respiration intensity and ethylene releasee1
- Direction
- loweste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The impact of the comparison CS was the worst”
e1“its respiration intensity and ethylene release were the lowest”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The comparison CS had low Vc and SSC content.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- comparison CSe0
- Outcome
- Vc and SSC contente1
- Direction
- lowe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The impact of the comparison CS was the worst”
e1“its Vc and SSC content were low”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The comparison CS had the worst quality during late MA storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- comparison CSe0
- Outcome
- qualitye1
- Direction
- worste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The impact of the comparison CS was the worst”
e1“its quality was the worst during the late MA storage”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment was the best and kept peach fruit in excellent quality during the front and middle storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- excellent qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment was the best,and it can keep the peach fruit excellent quality during the front and middle storage”
The same questions in other papers
1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →ethene · physiology: oxidative · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
ethene · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
ethene · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →ethene · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
ethene · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.