Claim · model-written summary
The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment gave lower firmness in peach fruit.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatmente0
- Outcome
- firmnesse1
- Direction
- lowere1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment can keep”
e1“lower firmness”
t0“peach”
Title
Yanping Guo; Ma Huiling; Guixi Wang; et al. Journal of Northwest A&F University 2009
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment kept the fine quality of peach fruit until the middle stage of MA storage.
- Intervention effect The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment kept normal respiration and ethylene release of peach fruit.
- Intervention effect The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment gave higher soluble solid and Vc content in peach fruit.
- Intervention effect The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment gave higher membrane permeability in peach fruit.
- Intervention effect The 10-20 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment had a higher rot velocity rate than the 5-10 μL/L treatment.
- Intervention effect The 1-MCP treatment had a later and lower ethylene release peak than other treatments during MA storage and 3-day shelf life.
- Intervention effect The 1-MCP treatment gave a lower respiration velocity in peach fruit.
- Intervention effect The 1-MCP treatment gave lower membrane permeability in peach fruit.
- Intervention effect The 1-MCP treatment gave a higher soluble solid and Vc content in peach fruit.
- Intervention effect The 1-MCP treatment lost the ability of normal softening even at 20 degrees C at the late period of storage.
- Intervention effect The airtight PE treatment had a lower rot velocity than CK.
- Intervention effect The airtight PE treatment had lower respiration intensity and ethylene release than CK.
- Intervention effect The airtight PE treatment had low Vc and SSc content.
- Intervention effect The airtight PE treatment had worse quality during late MA storage.
- Intervention effect The comparison CS had the highest rot velocity.
- Intervention effect The comparison CS had the lowest respiration intensity and ethylene release.
- Intervention effect The comparison CS had low Vc and SSC content.
- Intervention effect The comparison CS had the worst quality during late MA storage.
- Recommendation The 5-10 μL/L exogenous ethylene treatment was the best and kept peach fruit in excellent quality during the front and middle storage.