Paper · 2022 · The 2nd International Laayoune Forum on Biosaline Agriculture

Enhanced Salinity Tolerance of Medicago sativa, Roots AM Colonization and Soil Enzyme Activities by PGPR

Nabil Tirry; Mohamed Ferioun; Aziza Kouchou; et al.

6
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abiotic stresses such as salt are typical negative factors that have a considerable impact on agricultural output around the world. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of halotolerant plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on plant growth and soil function under salinity stress. The consortium of four PGPR (Pseudomonas putida, Alcaligenes sp., Klebsiella sp., and Pseudomonas cedrina) was tested for its effect on growth, chlorophyll content, oxidative stress, and root arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization of Medicago sativa in pots experiment under salt stress. The bacteria’s impact on soil enzyme activity was also investigated. Overall, in comparison to the non-inoculated control, inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content. It also reduced the levels of oxidative damage indicators such as malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and proline. Furthermore, the consortium had a beneficial effect on the activities of soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase, and arylamidase. The bacterial consortium has the potential to be employed as bio-inoculants for plants growing under salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation enhanced Medicago sativa growth under salt stress.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortiume0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae2symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
NaCl stresse0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–713 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas putida, Alcaligenes sp., Klebsiella sp., and Pseudomonas cedrina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation enhanced root AM colonization.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortiume0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
root AM colonizatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation enhanced leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortiume0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium reduced malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and proline levels.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
bacterial consortiume2
Outcome
levels of oxidative damage indicators such as malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and prolinee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also reduced the levels of oxidative damage indicators such as malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–713 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium beneficially affected soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase and arylamidase activities.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
consortiume0
Outcome
activities of soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase, and arylamidasee0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the consortium had a beneficial effect on the activities of soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase, and arylamidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial consortium has potential as a bio-inoculant under salt stress.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
employed as bio-inoculants for plants growing under salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial consortium has the potential to be employed as bio-inoculants for plants growing under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 22 positive, 14 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · Pseudomonas putida · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.