Abstract
Abiotic stresses such as salt are typical negative factors that have a considerable impact on agricultural output around the world. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of halotolerant plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on plant growth and soil function under salinity stress. The consortium of four PGPR (Pseudomonas putida, Alcaligenes sp., Klebsiella sp., and Pseudomonas cedrina) was tested for its effect on growth, chlorophyll content, oxidative stress, and root arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization of Medicago sativa in pots experiment under salt stress. The bacteria’s impact on soil enzyme activity was also investigated. Overall, in comparison to the non-inoculated control, inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content. It also reduced the levels of oxidative damage indicators such as malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and proline. Furthermore, the consortium had a beneficial effect on the activities of soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase, and arylamidase. The bacterial consortium has the potential to be employed as bio-inoculants for plants growing under salt stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR inoculation enhanced Medicago sativa growth under salt stress.
- Taxon
- Medicago sativa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortiume0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putidae2symbiont - Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Qualifier
- NaCl stresse0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content”
e1“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”
e2“Pseudomonas putida, Alcaligenes sp., Klebsiella sp., and Pseudomonas cedrina”
t0“Medicago sativa”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR inoculation enhanced root AM colonization.
- Taxon
- Medicago sativa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortiume0
- Interactor
- AMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- root AM colonizatione0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content”
e1“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”
t0“Medicago sativa”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR inoculation enhanced leaf chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- Medicago sativa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortiume0
- Outcome
- leaf chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium allowed us to overcome the unfavorable effects of NaCl stress and enhanced plant growth, root AM colonization, and leaf chlorophyll content”
e1“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”
t0“Medicago sativa”
Claim · model-written summary
The consortium reduced malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and proline levels.
- Taxon
- Medicago sativa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- bacterial consortiume2
- Outcome
- levels of oxidative damage indicators such as malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and prolinee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It also reduced the levels of oxidative damage indicators such as malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and proline”
e1“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”
e2“inoculating M. sativa plants with the bacterial consortium”
t0“Medicago sativa”
Claim · model-written summary
The consortium beneficially affected soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase and arylamidase activities.
- Taxon
- Medicago sativa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- consortiume0
- Outcome
- activities of soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase, and arylamidasee0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated controle1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the consortium had a beneficial effect on the activities of soil phosphatase, β-galactosidase, and arylamidase”
e1“in comparison to the non-inoculated control”
t0“Medicago sativa”
Claim · model-written summary
The bacterial consortium has potential as a bio-inoculant under salt stress.
- Taxon
- Medicago sativa
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- employed as bio-inoculants for plants growing under salt stresse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The bacterial consortium has the potential to be employed as bio-inoculants for plants growing under salt stress”
t0“Medicago sativa”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →inoculation · Pseudomonas putida · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.