Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Biotechnology

Effect of picloram and 2,4-D on plant regeneration from mature and immature embryos of moroccan durum wheat varieties

Khadija Ahansal; Hanane Aadel; Sripada Mahabala Udupa; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

An efficient genetic transformation protocol is a fundamental requirement for high regeneration capacity from cultivated durum wheat (Triticum durum) varieties. In this study, wereportedtheeffectsoftwoauxins,2,4-dichlorophenoxyaceticacid(2,4-D)and4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicoli nicacid(picloram), at a concentration of 2 mg/Laloneandincombination on the embryogenic callus and plantlet regeneration of four durum wheat varieties (Amria, Chaoui, Marouane, and Tomouh) using mature embryos (MEs) and immature embryos (ImEs). Significanteffectsofvariety,culturemedium(theauxinused),andvariety-mediuminteraction were observed on the callus weight and plantlet regeneration of both MR and ImE explants. The medium used for callus induction significantly affected plantlet regeneration (p < 0.001). Comparedto2,4-D, picloram led to a higher plantlet regeneration rate in both ME and ImE explants (19.8% and 40.86%, respectively). Plantlet regeneration also varied significantly depending on the variety and medium used. PicloramledtohighplantletregenerationofbothME and ImE explants in all varieties except Tomouh, which showed high plantlet regeneration of ME explants in 2,4-D. A comparison of ME and ImE responses indicated that ImEs are the best explants for high plantlet regeneration in durum wheat. Ourfindingssuggestthatpicloramisthebestauxin and should be used instead of 2,4-D due to its positive effect on increasing plant regeneration of durum wheat ME and ImE explants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety, culture medium (auxin used) and their interaction significantly affected callus weight and plantlet regeneration in both ME and ImE explants.

Treatment
culturemedium(theauxinused)e0
Outcome
callus weight and plantlet regeneratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significanteffectsofvariety,culturemedium(theauxinused),andvariety-mediuminteraction were observed on the callus weight and plantlet regeneration of both MR and ImE explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium used for callus induction significantly affected plantlet regeneration (p < 0.001).

Treatment
medium used for callus inductione0
Outcome
plantlet regeneratione0
Qualifier
p < 0.001e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The medium used for callus induction significantly affected plantlet regeneration (p < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with 2,4-D, picloram gave a higher plantlet regeneration rate in mature-embryo (ME) explants (19.8%).

Organ / stage
MEe0
Treatment
piclorame0
Outcome
plantlet regeneration ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.8%e0
Comparator
2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparedto2,4-D, picloram led to a higher plantlet regeneration rate in both ME and ImE explants (19.8% and 40.86%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with 2,4-D, picloram gave a higher plantlet regeneration rate in immature-embryo (ImE) explants (40.86%).

Organ / stage
ImE explantse0
Treatment
piclorame0
Outcome
plantlet regeneration ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
40.86%e0
Comparator
2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparedto2,4-D, picloram led to a higher plantlet regeneration rate in both ME and ImE explants (19.8% and 40.86%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picloram led to high plantlet regeneration of both ME and ImE explants in all varieties except Tomouh.

Organ / stage
ME and ImE explantse0
Treatment
Piclorame0
Outcome
plantletregeneratione0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
except Tomouhe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PicloramledtohighplantletregenerationofbothME and ImE explants in all varieties except Tomouh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety Tomouh showed high plantlet regeneration of ME explants in 2,4-D.

Material
Tomouhe0
Organ / stage
ME explantse0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
plantlet regeneratione0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except Tomouh, which showed high plantlet regeneration of ME explants in 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ImE explants are the best explants for high plantlet regeneration in durum wheat compared with ME explants.

Organ / stage
ImEse0
Outcome
high plantlet regeneratione0
Comparator
MEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A comparison of ME and ImE responses indicated that ImEs are the best explants for high plantlet regeneration in durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend picloram instead of 2,4-D as the best auxin for increasing plant regeneration of durum wheat ME and ImE explants.

Outcome
plant regeneratione0
Qualifier
should be used instead of 2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“picloramisthebestauxin and should be used instead of 2,4-D due to its positive effect on increasing plant regeneration of durum wheat ME and ImE explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1474 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.