Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Fertilizer Potential of Organic-Based Soil Amendments on cv. Sangiovese (V. vinifera L.) Vines: Preliminary Results

Elena Baldi; Greta Polidori; Margherita Germani; et al.

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The intensification of highly specialized viticulture has led to a dramatic decrease of soil fertility that can be restored by increasing soil organic matter using organic fertilizers. The aim of the present experiment was to evaluate the effect of different organic amendments on vine vegetative growth and nutritional status, soil N availability and microbial biomass, as well as on yield and grape quality. The experiment was carried out in 2020 and 2021, on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris) planted in February 2019. Plants were fertilized yearly in spring with (1) mineral fertilization (MIN), (2) municipal organic waste compost (MOW), and (3) sewage sludge compost (SS). The application of SS increased nitrate availability in both years, while the supply of organic matter (no matter the source) enhanced soil microbial biomass content. Plant nutritional status was in the optimal range for all treatments, with an increase of N in SS and K in MOW. Fruit yield in 2020 was not influenced by treatments, while in 2021 it was enhanced by MIN and MOW, which also induced a higher berry quality. Plant vegetative growth was stimulated by the application of SS. In conclusion, from these preliminary results we observed a higher N availability as a consequence of SS supply that resulted in a higher plant biomass, but reduced yield and berry quality, supporting the theory that for vineyards, N should be carefully managed to reach an equilibrium between vegetative and reproductive activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application of SS increased nitrate availability in both years.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Material
cv. Sangiovesee0
Treatment
application of SSe2
Outcome
nitrate availabilitye2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of SS increased nitrate availability in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The supply of organic matter from any source enhanced soil microbial biomass content.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
supply of organic matter (no matter the source)e3
Outcome
soil microbial biomass contente3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e3

“the supply of organic matter (no matter the source) enhanced soil microbial biomass content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge compost increased plant N.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
sewage sludge compost (SS)e1
Outcome
Ne4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were fertilized yearly in spring with (1) mineral fertilization (MIN), (2) municipal organic waste compost (MOW), and (3) sewage sludge compost (SS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–739 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plant nutritional status was in the optimal range for all treatments, with an increase of N in SS and K in MOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Municipal organic waste compost increased plant K.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
municipal organic waste compost (MOW)e1
Outcome
Ke4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were fertilized yearly in spring with (1) mineral fertilization (MIN), (2) municipal organic waste compost (MOW), and (3) sewage sludge compost (SS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–739 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plant nutritional status was in the optimal range for all treatments, with an increase of N in SS and K in MOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1018 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nutritional status was in the optimal range for all treatments.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
all treatmentse4
Outcome
Plant nutritional statuse4
Qualifier
in the optimal rangee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plant nutritional status was in the optimal range for all treatments, with an increase of N in SS and K in MOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield in 2020 was not influenced by the treatments.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
treatmentse5
Outcome
Fruit yield in 2020e5
Direction
not influencede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit yield in 2020 was not influenced by treatments, while in 2021 it was enhanced by MIN and MOW, which also induced a higher berry quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2021, MIN and MOW enhanced fruit yield.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
MIN and MOWe5
Outcome
Fruit yielde5
Direction
enhancede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were fertilized yearly in spring with (1) mineral fertilization (MIN), (2) municipal organic waste compost (MOW), and (3) sewage sludge compost (SS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–739 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit yield in 2020 was not influenced by treatments, while in 2021 it was enhanced by MIN and MOW, which also induced a higher berry quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MIN and MOW induced higher berry quality.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
MIN and MOWe5
Outcome
berry qualitye5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were fertilized yearly in spring with (1) mineral fertilization (MIN), (2) municipal organic waste compost (MOW), and (3) sewage sludge compost (SS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–739 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit yield in 2020 was not influenced by treatments, while in 2021 it was enhanced by MIN and MOW, which also induced a higher berry quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application of SS stimulated plant vegetative growth.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
application of SSe6
Outcome
Plant vegetative growthe6
Direction
stimulatede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plant vegetative growth was stimulated by the application of SS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SS supply resulted in a higher plant biomass.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
SS supplye7
Outcome
plant biomasse7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e7

“we observed a higher N availability as a consequence of SS supply that resulted in a higher plant biomass, but reduced yield and berry quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SS supply reduced yield and berry quality.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
SS supplye7
Outcome
yield and berry qualitye7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e7

“we observed a higher N availability as a consequence of SS supply that resulted in a higher plant biomass, but reduced yield and berry quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1416 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Vineyard nitrogen should be managed carefully to reach an equilibrium between vegetative and reproductive activity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
equilibrium between vegetative and reproductive activitye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on 110 Richter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–525 · show in text ↑
e5

“N should be carefully managed to reach an equilibrium between vegetative and reproductive activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1558 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.